@miguelitosdiy: estoy enamorado de esta tienda 😍🥰 #QuéHaríaHarley #foryou #DIY #dollartreehacks #fivebelow #fiveandbelow

Miguel Bastidas
Miguel Bastidas
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Friday 11 September 2020 20:41:03 GMT
9463
223
11
17

Music

Download

Comments

miguelyedric
miguelyedric :
😁
2020-09-12 04:37:23
2
rutyminervacruz
Minerva Cruz🇵🇷💙 :
Me toooooo I love that store
2020-09-17 21:54:09
1
ot844
maria :
😂😂😂 me too😅😅😅
2020-09-17 23:08:47
1
blnanas
bl.nana :
on dirait Action
2020-10-20 05:42:38
1
yennymendoza09
Yenny Mendoza :
en los angeles hay de esas
2020-10-01 05:37:04
0
mumix28
user8718750552598 :
por Dios quede enamorada d todo lo lindo q venden🥰
2020-10-07 02:44:51
0
bellaalfaro3
🌺 :
Me encanta que tú ere como yo no vamos con los baratito 🥰🥰🥰🥰😅
2021-03-30 00:46:28
0
To see more videos from user @miguelitosdiy, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Romans 1 is a complex chapter and admittedly poses the biggest challenge to the affirming position. For the purpose of this short video, the simple point is that just because same sex relations are said to be “contrary to nature” doesn’t rule them out of God’s plan, or else the salvation of the Gentiles would be ruled out as well!  This argument comes from the theologian Eugene Rogers, in his book “Sexuality and the Christian Body.” His argument is based on “God’s acting ‘contrary to’ or ‘beyond’ nature in incorporating the Gentiles into the Jewish olive tree (Rom. 11:24) [and] God’s predilection for irregular sexuality in salvation history, as in the cases of the women named in the genealogy of Jesus.” A lot more can be said about Romans 1, but what is clear from Romans 2 and the argument of the rest of the book is that Romans 1 is *not* primarily a diatribe against homosexuality, it’s a “rhetorical sting operation” where Paul “let his readers regard same-sex sexual activity as a characteristically Gentile sin of excess, one that [Jewish Christians] could temporarily pride themselves on avoiding, until chapter 2 comes in… [and] Jews turn out also to be without excuse.”  Finally, we should also read this chapter keeping in mind that Paul had no understanding of homosexual orientation, so the relationships he would have had in mind were seen as excessive because he would have been picturing what we know as heterosexual people engaging in homosexual sex. . . . . . . . . . . . #f#faithb#beliefc#christianityc#churchB#Bible#christianity#evangelicalismd#deconstructiont#theology#s#sexualitys#sexe#ethics#p#purityculturequeertheology #gaychristian
Romans 1 is a complex chapter and admittedly poses the biggest challenge to the affirming position. For the purpose of this short video, the simple point is that just because same sex relations are said to be “contrary to nature” doesn’t rule them out of God’s plan, or else the salvation of the Gentiles would be ruled out as well! This argument comes from the theologian Eugene Rogers, in his book “Sexuality and the Christian Body.” His argument is based on “God’s acting ‘contrary to’ or ‘beyond’ nature in incorporating the Gentiles into the Jewish olive tree (Rom. 11:24) [and] God’s predilection for irregular sexuality in salvation history, as in the cases of the women named in the genealogy of Jesus.” A lot more can be said about Romans 1, but what is clear from Romans 2 and the argument of the rest of the book is that Romans 1 is *not* primarily a diatribe against homosexuality, it’s a “rhetorical sting operation” where Paul “let his readers regard same-sex sexual activity as a characteristically Gentile sin of excess, one that [Jewish Christians] could temporarily pride themselves on avoiding, until chapter 2 comes in… [and] Jews turn out also to be without excuse.” Finally, we should also read this chapter keeping in mind that Paul had no understanding of homosexual orientation, so the relationships he would have had in mind were seen as excessive because he would have been picturing what we know as heterosexual people engaging in homosexual sex. . . . . . . . . . . . #f#faithb#beliefc#christianityc#churchB#Bible#christianity#evangelicalismd#deconstructiont#theology#s#sexualitys#sexe#ethics#p#purityculturequeertheology #gaychristian

About