@ibrahim.iq: #الحشدالشعبي #ابومهدي_المهندس #سبايكر

ابراهيم ناصر قاسم
ابراهيم ناصر قاسم
Open In TikTok:
Region: IQ
Saturday 12 June 2021 17:11:58 GMT
215649
25645
664
1131

Music

Download

Comments

ayranyh
حيدر عماد :
ويكولون كباب. طبعا الي يكول كباب ضايج لأن جانت اخته مرتاحه وي الشيشاني 😏
2021-06-12 20:13:55
182
nod3eee
𝐍 𝐎 𝐃 :
😂😂 اول مره اشوف كباب يحجي سبحان الله
2021-06-13 19:08:17
6
kado1994k
محمد قدو :
🤣🤣🤣هوا انته اتعرف الله
2021-06-13 11:21:00
4
77ein
الكوافير :
حيا الله ولد الشايب
2021-06-12 17:45:21
47
mlml372
Ml Ml :
الله يرحمك يا شيبة العراق
2021-06-12 20:22:29
50
rr.m0
رضا محمد :
يعني تتوقعون تكتلون شبابنا ومنگدر نوصلكم ..الف رحمة على روحك متحسف على الأيام الچنت ما اعرف ابو مهدي ع حقيقته قبل ليستشهد
2021-06-13 23:24:04
1
iq_bt99
iq_bt99 :
يكول اني صلاة ماعرف اُصًلًيےّ• وجاي يجاهد ؏ اهل لٱ اله الا •اللّـہ̣̥
2021-06-13 12:56:27
2
3__________1________3
🇮🇶 :
يحارب ابدولة الأسلام علمود الأسلام اوهو مايعرف يصلي😂
2021-06-12 19:26:10
1
userrv1mxvpzys
وائل علي :
عمت عيني عليك يا الغالي. ربي يرحمه برحمته الواسعة وأسكنها فسيح جناته
2021-06-12 19:08:58
25
s7rns
طلوب :
لعد انتَالله ميحاسبك من تأمر جماعتك بالصك😂
2021-06-12 22:53:08
1
rafedhamed
رافد حميد :
ألف رحمه ونور على روحك الشهيد القائد أبو مهدي المهندس والشهيد القائد قاسم سليماني وجميع الشهداء
2021-06-12 18:49:09
71
dy5568
Diyaa :
وهسا سجن الحوت مليان دو١عش اكل ونوم ومصروف يوميا ١٥دولار شكو مخلينهم طكهم واخذ ثار الشباب
2021-06-13 14:54:27
0
haideralialgharani
حيدر علي الغراني :
ألف رحمه ونور على روحك الشهيد القائد أبو مهدي المهندس والشهيد القائد قاسم سليماني وجميع الشهداء
2021-06-12 20:09:12
8
abod_cs
ْ :
والله بطل ابو مهدي اني سني وافتخر بي . جماعة الي يكولون كباب ذول بعثية
2021-06-12 22:01:56
3
qho45
الحزين :
عمت عيني عليك حجي الف رحمه ونور على روحك
2021-06-12 19:50:59
9
user700446297
زينب :
@rafedhamed:ألف رحمه ونور على روحك الشهيد القائد أبو مهدي المهندس والشهيد القائد قاسم سليماني وجميع الشهداء
2021-06-12 19:46:31
6
dybipzmlar43
ام زينب :
رحمك الله وجعل مثواك الجنه ابو مهدي المهندس تاج راسي
2021-11-12 07:52:29
1
y6_j11
🦋أيلول 🌸 :
دوله اسلاميه وجنوده مايعرف يصلي •اللّـہ̣̥ يرحمك ابو مهدي 💔💔
2021-06-12 19:12:06
1
user494460859
حسام الربيعي :
الف رحمه ونور على روحه الطاهره في جنات النعيم ان شاء الله الملتقى عنده الحسين ان شاء الله
2021-06-19 21:52:23
0
user264527845
Mr Mr2091 :
الله يرحمك .خساره والله
2021-06-19 18:15:38
0
dy8gojcl1ncx
dy8gojcl1ncx :
الله يرحمه ويسكنه فسيح جناته
2021-06-20 06:16:21
0
dyq6e6xy9cdm
عماد المياحي ابو شمس :
الله يرحمه برحمته الى جنة الخلد انشالله مع ركب الامام الحسين عليه الصلاة والسلام
2021-06-19 22:53:44
0
hussam9977
حسام البصراوي :
الله يرحمك ابو مهدي المهندس
2021-06-20 07:26:58
0
user8397358751260
الحزين :
الف رحمه ونور ع ارواحهم الطاهره
2021-06-20 06:23:03
0
1zi.j
🖤🥀 :
اشهد ان لااله الا الله واشهد ان ابو مهدي في جنه الله
2021-06-14 14:03:26
0
To see more videos from user @ibrahim.iq, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

my brother ate 10 chocolate ate tops, Buffalo!  Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form  a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is  g 64 Graham's number is an incomprehensibly large finite number that once held the record for the largest number ever used in a serious mathematical proof. Named after mathematician Ronald Graham, it serves as an upper bound to a specific problem in Ramsey theory regarding lines in multidimensional hypercubes.Because it is so large, the observable universe is far too small to contain its full digital representation—even if you turned every subatomic particle in the universe into a digit. #larp  #tcc  #truecringecomunnity
my brother ate 10 chocolate ate tops, Buffalo! Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 Graham's number is an incomprehensibly large finite number that once held the record for the largest number ever used in a serious mathematical proof. Named after mathematician Ronald Graham, it serves as an upper bound to a specific problem in Ramsey theory regarding lines in multidimensional hypercubes.Because it is so large, the observable universe is far too small to contain its full digital representation—even if you turned every subatomic particle in the universe into a digit. #larp #tcc #truecringecomunnity

About