Jack Lawrence
Region: GB
Sunday 11 July 2021 16:01:17 GMT
264348
41748
572
1371
Music
Download
Comments
Will Worth :
This is a great explanation. Anyone wanting to learn more should look up bayesian probability.
2021-07-11 16:06:36
971
HamSandwich :
People generally get tests if there’s a specific sign they may have the disease, rather than being randomly selected
2021-07-11 20:46:31
327
Sagar Shrestha :
love the explanation
2021-07-11 21:12:00
0
Jorge Navarro :
Ok but what if everyone takes the test twice?
2021-07-11 16:32:17
13
amanda :
These vids give me goosebumps, keep it up! Such interesting topics
2021-07-11 17:59:31
64
Jack Lawrence :
Hey team, redid this video as in the first version I used the word 'accurately' slightly inaccurately in a stats context. The irony was not lost on me
2021-07-11 16:02:28
278
Adina :
off topic, I think i m falling in love with you!
2021-07-11 17:35:00
19
Longy.89 :
Thanks for this. Had something rare (all good now, 👍NHS) but didn’t know this. I do recall that they kept repeating the blood tests though!
2021-07-11 16:34:51
4
RickyMocho601 :
So covid?
2021-07-11 16:30:56
1
your mother :
hold on tho if its verified to have 99% accuracy that means that any other stat doesnt affect that isnt this a gamblers fallacy
2021-07-11 19:08:04
7
lolo martin :
Hear me out take the test 5 times
2021-07-11 19:09:27
73
user0972794787 :
Fantastic content as always. Love your stuff man
2021-07-11 16:39:31
39
Kevin Hitchings :
Except there would be flags to prompt the test so it’s wouldn’t be given to an even distribution of people.
2021-07-11 19:59:51
23
Uber_Uber :
Your a genius jack
2021-07-11 16:03:36
3
TM Crystal :
Yes, bayesian probability, but you only test for the disease because you show symtomps, lets say 100 out of 10000 shows systoms but dont have it, then
2021-07-11 19:30:43
0
basil katakuzinos :
50%
2021-07-11 20:03:16
0
Morg :
actually 50/50, you have it or you dont
2021-07-11 22:14:40
0
Mangalisa Dlamini :
I don’t how you did it but you u made stats interesting
2021-07-11 17:11:21
24
FrankeeFrankly :
Yet they are likely not testing the 990,000 people.
2021-07-11 19:13:49
11
Eleth Eclypse :
Well, Why take 1M as a sample not ill ? Your "stats" would change based on what you chose the numbers to be right ?
2021-07-11 18:44:44
12
Jak :
nice way of showing types 1 and 2 errors
2021-07-11 16:31:35
2
user1394766425251 :
Bayes Statistics 😅 YouTube Veritassium on Bayes Statistics
2021-07-11 17:49:48
2
To see more videos from user @jack.lawro, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![Giác Hơi - [ Hoả Trị Liệu ] thời tiết đang giao mùa , dễ cảm ốm lắm các Bác ạ #trilieuhaiphong #trilieuvaigay #xuhuong #Giachoi #massage #Master2023byTikTok](/video/cover/7287906362829344001.webp)