@racunbyserra: [ Hanya Rindu - Andmesh ] #4u #fyp #fypage #foryoupage #lyricsvideo #esekeli #xyzbca #fypシ

your tulips
your tulips
Open In TikTok:
Region: MY
Tuesday 11 October 2022 10:37:22 GMT
285265
14240
156
4972

Music

Download

Comments

alvindraaaaaaaa
alviiii :
thank
2024-11-06 09:01:08
0
ketot073
Boa Maiza😘 :
up
2022-10-11 15:06:49
4
amalina03_
mekna ♥️ :
rindunya kat arwah datuk 😭😭
2022-10-11 11:01:34
58
shaa0_5
eyshaaa. :
sye pandai mop pantai.
2022-10-11 11:49:19
11
a_jhah
a :
kuatkan hati ini yallah
2022-10-11 11:21:17
42
user.jane03
🎀 :
beratnya tanggung rindu dkt orang yg sudah tiada..rindu ibu😞💔
2022-10-11 13:47:16
31
muhammadnazim38gmil.com
ناظم :
t Saya rindu nya arwah ibu😭😭😭 tempatkanlah ibuku ke syurga
2022-10-11 11:24:29
14
hzim_03
hzim_03 :
rindu kenangan dulu 🥲
2022-10-11 13:59:37
10
To see more videos from user @racunbyserra, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

The phrase “We have to keep them hungry so they’ll come back to work” reveals a stark and exploitative ideology that underpins many economic systems, especially those rooted in maximizing profits at the expense of workers. This mindset reflects a deliberate strategy by certain employers, corporations, or even entire systems to maintain control over labor by ensuring workers remain economically dependent, effectively trapping them in cycles of poverty or financial insecurity. Understanding the Mindset The idea behind this statement is simple but cruel: if workers achieve financial security or autonomy, they might no longer be willing to perform low-wage, undesirable, or high-effort jobs under poor conditions. By keeping wages low and opportunities scarce, employers ensure that workers have little choice but to return, driven by necessity rather than genuine opportunity or ambition. This form of control is not just about ensuring a steady labor force—it’s about reinforcing a hierarchical system where power and wealth remain concentrated at the top. Practical Implementation This ideology manifests in various ways across industries and systems: 	1.	Stagnant Wages: Despite rising productivity and profits, wages for many workers remain stagnant, forcing them to live paycheck to paycheck. When workers are unable to save or invest in their future, they are more likely to stay in jobs they dislike simply to survive. 	2.	Unstable Employment Models: Many companies shift to gig work, part-time positions, or temporary contracts, offering little to no benefits or job security. This keeps workers in a precarious state, constantly in need of more hours or additional jobs to make ends meet. 	3.	Minimal Social Safety Nets: Inadequate healthcare, childcare, housing support, or unemployment benefits often leave workers with no viable alternatives but to return to work under exploitative conditions, reinforcing dependency. 	4.	Debt as a Tool: Employers and financial systems often capitalize on debt as a form of control. Low wages paired with easy access to credit create a cycle where workers must constantly work to pay off their obligations, with no end in sight. Psychological and Social Impacts The impact of such a system goes far beyond economics. It dehumanizes workers, reducing their value to how much profit they can generate while disregarding their well-being. This constant pressure to work under financial strain fosters stress, mental health issues, and family instability. Socially, it perpetuates inequality, as those born into poverty face limited opportunities to escape, while wealth and power remain concentrated among those who benefit from these exploitative practices. The Broader Implications At its core, this philosophy reveals the priorities of certain economic systems that prioritize profits over people. It underscores a broader narrative that poverty and financial insecurity are not accidental but are designed outcomes of policies and decisions that ensure labor remains cheap and plentiful. The statement “We have to keep them hungry” is not just about literal hunger—it represents a broader metaphor for keeping people in a state of need, ensuring that the status quo remains unchallenged. This ideology creates a society where the majority are trapped in survival mode, unable to focus on growth, education, or innovation. Meanwhile, those at the top benefit from a cheap, compliant labor force, allowing them to accumulate more wealth and power without accountability. Why This Matters The persistence of this ideology raises critical ethical and practical questions. Should the success of an economic system hinge on the deliberate suppression of the many for the benefit of the few? And at what cost to humanity, society, and progress? Recognizing and addressing this mindset is crucial to creating systems that value equity, dignity, and opportunity for all, rather than perpetuating cycles of dependence and exploitation.
The phrase “We have to keep them hungry so they’ll come back to work” reveals a stark and exploitative ideology that underpins many economic systems, especially those rooted in maximizing profits at the expense of workers. This mindset reflects a deliberate strategy by certain employers, corporations, or even entire systems to maintain control over labor by ensuring workers remain economically dependent, effectively trapping them in cycles of poverty or financial insecurity. Understanding the Mindset The idea behind this statement is simple but cruel: if workers achieve financial security or autonomy, they might no longer be willing to perform low-wage, undesirable, or high-effort jobs under poor conditions. By keeping wages low and opportunities scarce, employers ensure that workers have little choice but to return, driven by necessity rather than genuine opportunity or ambition. This form of control is not just about ensuring a steady labor force—it’s about reinforcing a hierarchical system where power and wealth remain concentrated at the top. Practical Implementation This ideology manifests in various ways across industries and systems: 1. Stagnant Wages: Despite rising productivity and profits, wages for many workers remain stagnant, forcing them to live paycheck to paycheck. When workers are unable to save or invest in their future, they are more likely to stay in jobs they dislike simply to survive. 2. Unstable Employment Models: Many companies shift to gig work, part-time positions, or temporary contracts, offering little to no benefits or job security. This keeps workers in a precarious state, constantly in need of more hours or additional jobs to make ends meet. 3. Minimal Social Safety Nets: Inadequate healthcare, childcare, housing support, or unemployment benefits often leave workers with no viable alternatives but to return to work under exploitative conditions, reinforcing dependency. 4. Debt as a Tool: Employers and financial systems often capitalize on debt as a form of control. Low wages paired with easy access to credit create a cycle where workers must constantly work to pay off their obligations, with no end in sight. Psychological and Social Impacts The impact of such a system goes far beyond economics. It dehumanizes workers, reducing their value to how much profit they can generate while disregarding their well-being. This constant pressure to work under financial strain fosters stress, mental health issues, and family instability. Socially, it perpetuates inequality, as those born into poverty face limited opportunities to escape, while wealth and power remain concentrated among those who benefit from these exploitative practices. The Broader Implications At its core, this philosophy reveals the priorities of certain economic systems that prioritize profits over people. It underscores a broader narrative that poverty and financial insecurity are not accidental but are designed outcomes of policies and decisions that ensure labor remains cheap and plentiful. The statement “We have to keep them hungry” is not just about literal hunger—it represents a broader metaphor for keeping people in a state of need, ensuring that the status quo remains unchallenged. This ideology creates a society where the majority are trapped in survival mode, unable to focus on growth, education, or innovation. Meanwhile, those at the top benefit from a cheap, compliant labor force, allowing them to accumulate more wealth and power without accountability. Why This Matters The persistence of this ideology raises critical ethical and practical questions. Should the success of an economic system hinge on the deliberate suppression of the many for the benefit of the few? And at what cost to humanity, society, and progress? Recognizing and addressing this mindset is crucial to creating systems that value equity, dignity, and opportunity for all, rather than perpetuating cycles of dependence and exploitation.

About