@bigbodyhottiee: Don’t want to be here any longer

Sabrina ❤️
Sabrina ❤️
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Saturday 11 March 2023 13:40:24 GMT
62289
1251
301
41

Music

Download

Comments

jmr2923
jmr2923 :
Because if you’re using an ambulance to get home you can’t always expect them to be able to get you within 4 minutes of discharge…
2023-03-11 15:22:46
103
dizzy.dizz
Dizzy :
hospital staff are extremely judgmental, so I think they feel like it's "teaching you lesson" by making you wait so long.
2023-03-11 17:51:38
38
mindianawild
MELINDA :
But....brought your own pillow from home?
2023-03-17 13:38:59
46
themessyacre
The Messy Acre :
After an hour I took my IV out and left
2023-03-17 13:55:24
12
becca_oh
Becca50 :
Cause there are emergencies that take precedence 🤦🏻‍♀️
2023-03-11 20:57:59
96
thebrodl
Anna :
wait but I'm genuinely confused. you can't leave by yourself after being discharged? what am i missing?
2023-03-18 04:27:55
14
lesleyfisher4
les :
Awe honey They have to do emergencies first. Hang in there
2023-03-16 00:25:59
20
colin_macdonald
Colin MacDonald :
but… you’re on you’re phone
2023-03-17 16:12:19
21
pretty_in_ink48
Pretty In Ink 48 :
Can they give u something for the discomfort
2023-03-12 14:30:49
2
blakefabian80
Blake Fabian :
Been a Pmed for 14 years. Calls are answered in order of priority. Nonemergent return to home trip is on the bottom of the list.
2023-03-18 09:10:14
30
brynnrn232
BrynnRN :
Because you are not the only patient
2023-03-18 05:41:24
22
peaceful1072
Catwoman :
Why are you there?
2023-03-12 00:51:50
1
jonathanjohnglase
Jonathan Glase :
Uber
2023-03-17 13:59:55
4
keribrooks97
꧁❤︎Keri Ann❤︎꧂ :
Prayers Sister!! ❤️
2023-03-12 00:17:49
2
kainenroxsahbasti
kainenroxsahbasti :
what would be different at home..?
2023-03-21 02:50:29
16
chronicallyscary
Allie Tran :
I’m so sorry babe I hope you can go home very soon:( I know it’s traumatic being in the ER when you’re bedbound, sending strength
2023-03-11 22:35:01
4
teamshadowcathy42
Gardenchickengalcathy42 :
prayers sweetie I hope pray you get to go home
2023-03-11 18:15:45
3
pretty_in_ink48
Pretty In Ink 48 :
What did the doctors say are u ok?
2023-03-11 17:52:16
2
debbielee408
Debbielee408 :
Because you’re not the only one & you need ambulance to get home
2023-03-18 05:41:46
5
scottish_fisherman_4083
Scottish_Fisherman_4083 :
Big hugs 🫂 xxx
2023-03-17 16:13:05
2
tonieharrington316
TonieHarrington@316 :
I'm sorry, are you home and feeling better now?
2023-03-12 02:19:47
2
theunforgettablewoman
🌹 :
I’m so sorry beautiful
2023-03-11 16:34:25
2
danielleholykay
Kholyfield :
Are you home? Been thinking about you
2023-03-11 23:41:11
2
user5247985377
User5247985377 :
I’m sorry sweetie here’s to new beginnings, please make positive changes and feel the results physically and mentally
2023-03-18 08:19:58
3
ziggy_stardust1
ziggy_stardust👽🛸 :
I am so sorry ! ! ! I’ll be thinking about you !!
2023-03-11 16:22:41
3
To see more videos from user @bigbodyhottiee, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

A live TV interview turns into a tense argument over pronouns, biological sex and whether a presenter should be required to use language she believes is factually incorrect. The guest asks to be addressed with specific pronouns, while the host pushes back and says that using those terms would conflict with how she understands the guest’s sex. What starts as a polite introduction quickly becomes the entire focus of the interview. The host argues that people are free to describe themselves however they choose, but says that freedom does not automatically create an obligation for everyone else to use the same words. She repeatedly separates personal identity from what she considers biological reality and says she should also be free to use language consistent with her own beliefs. The guest responds that using requested pronouns is a matter of basic respect and says the host is choosing language that feels dismissive. That disagreement captures a much larger cultural debate. Supporters of preferred-pronoun policies generally argue that using someone’s requested terms is a simple way to show respect and reduce unnecessary hostility. Critics argue that compelled language can cross into forced agreement, especially when a person believes the requested terminology conflicts with sex-based definitions. Those are different principles: one emphasizes social recognition, while the other emphasizes freedom of speech and factual language. What makes this exchange so striking is that neither side is really confused about the other’s position. They understand the disagreement and simply reject the rule the other person wants applied. The guest wants the host to use the requested pronouns; the host insists that she will not say something she considers untrue on her own show. That leaves the core question for viewers: when identity, courtesy and free expression collide, should respect require using another person’s preferred language, or should each person retain the right to choose the words they believe are accurate? #Pronouns #GenderDebate #FreeSpeech #LiveTV #PublicDebate
A live TV interview turns into a tense argument over pronouns, biological sex and whether a presenter should be required to use language she believes is factually incorrect. The guest asks to be addressed with specific pronouns, while the host pushes back and says that using those terms would conflict with how she understands the guest’s sex. What starts as a polite introduction quickly becomes the entire focus of the interview. The host argues that people are free to describe themselves however they choose, but says that freedom does not automatically create an obligation for everyone else to use the same words. She repeatedly separates personal identity from what she considers biological reality and says she should also be free to use language consistent with her own beliefs. The guest responds that using requested pronouns is a matter of basic respect and says the host is choosing language that feels dismissive. That disagreement captures a much larger cultural debate. Supporters of preferred-pronoun policies generally argue that using someone’s requested terms is a simple way to show respect and reduce unnecessary hostility. Critics argue that compelled language can cross into forced agreement, especially when a person believes the requested terminology conflicts with sex-based definitions. Those are different principles: one emphasizes social recognition, while the other emphasizes freedom of speech and factual language. What makes this exchange so striking is that neither side is really confused about the other’s position. They understand the disagreement and simply reject the rule the other person wants applied. The guest wants the host to use the requested pronouns; the host insists that she will not say something she considers untrue on her own show. That leaves the core question for viewers: when identity, courtesy and free expression collide, should respect require using another person’s preferred language, or should each person retain the right to choose the words they believe are accurate? #Pronouns #GenderDebate #FreeSpeech #LiveTV #PublicDebate

About