@posmanufacturer: #cash register #all in one#manufacturersall

cash register manufacturer
cash register manufacturer
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Tuesday 21 March 2023 06:41:21 GMT
917
33
0
1

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @posmanufacturer, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

A 66-year-old grandmother's pork shop in a Chongqing village was fined $7,000, not for poisoning anyone, but for a missing sticker. Mao Lanying makes bean paste by a method from her grandparents, in a village workshop up a concrete slope past a fish pond. Her daughter-in-law, Wang Yaqiong, runs the business. In July 2021 they shipped 150 bowls of steamed pork for 4,500 yuan, about $630. Nobody argued the pork was dangerous. The family vacuum-sealed each bowl so it would survive the mail, and the bags had no label: no date, no producer, no shelf life. Article 148 of the Food Safety Law pays a buyer ten times the price for that, so $640 of pork became $6,400 of damages. Wang posted a video of her mother-in-law in tears, saying the family, earning what she called
A 66-year-old grandmother's pork shop in a Chongqing village was fined $7,000, not for poisoning anyone, but for a missing sticker. Mao Lanying makes bean paste by a method from her grandparents, in a village workshop up a concrete slope past a fish pond. Her daughter-in-law, Wang Yaqiong, runs the business. In July 2021 they shipped 150 bowls of steamed pork for 4,500 yuan, about $630. Nobody argued the pork was dangerous. The family vacuum-sealed each bowl so it would survive the mail, and the bags had no label: no date, no producer, no shelf life. Article 148 of the Food Safety Law pays a buyer ten times the price for that, so $640 of pork became $6,400 of damages. Wang posted a video of her mother-in-law in tears, saying the family, earning what she called "hard money," had been "extorted" out of 50,000 yuan. Maybe you're thinking "good, labels protect people." Fair point. But this buyer was not a customer who got sick. He was hunting. Shao Baichun had ordered from her four times before, in small amounts, and saw exactly how the food was packed. Then he placed a 150-bowl order from 2,000 miles away. She held two licenses, and inspectors had signed off on her kitchen. He was a professional. He knew the ten-times rule, so he knew the more he spent, the more he could claim. The 150-bowl order turned $630 of pork into a $6,400 claim against this one family. Wang's video spread, and topics about the case passed 100 million reads. With the whole country watching, Shao settled privately and dropped the suit in January 2024, and the High Court wiped both verdicts off the books. Then, in August 2024, China's Supreme Court capped these payouts at what a normal household would reasonably buy, which killed the 150-bowl trick. But it left the rest of the law standing, so hunters still sue over small purchases, where even a cheap item with a missing date triggers a 1,000 yuan claim. So that's still who gets sued now: small shops like Wang's, on purpose. Big food companies print proper labels and hire lawyers. A village grandmother has neither, so when a hunter sues her, she loses, and the money comes out of her pocket.

About