@northvalleygrp: It’s fine, i’m fine…🫠 #nostress #noworries #fyp

North Valley Group
North Valley Group
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Thursday 23 March 2023 00:54:44 GMT
98758
5653
32
333

Music

Download

Comments

macariamacariah
Mariah :
All the worries every which way!
2023-03-23 01:42:50
14
jessssier
Jessie 📚 🍄 ✨ :
Always worries😫
2023-03-23 01:02:30
35
inexplicableangel
Azrael Santiago :
According to my maths class they cancel out😁
2023-03-23 04:04:54
7
drkathleenfamilydoctor
Dr. Kathleen :
Gonna overthink that for a week 😢😅😢😅
2023-03-23 02:15:52
4
kinich8
Jennifer Samuels :
I’ve thought long and hard about this and I’ve decided. I’ll take the red head!🥰
2023-04-09 11:59:18
4
caseybear007
caseybear007 :
Plus a secret third and fourth way 🙈😂
2023-04-08 22:25:59
3
naturallyjulia
Julia :
I told someone yesterday that it’s fine either way, when in fact there is one clear right choice and it is not fine either way
2023-03-23 01:27:19
3
psychic.sandy
Psychic Sandy Spiritual Healer :
I really laughed from this one 😂 because it’s true
2023-04-13 21:31:30
2
goober394
Goober :
and secretly a third way
2023-03-23 02:04:02
2
rachaelmulvey108
RaeRaeFam :
that's me. I worry harder when I've got to say no worries either way.
2023-04-13 10:19:56
2
z_menagerie
z_menagerie :
worries ALL the ways
2023-04-10 22:17:37
2
joshedwards532
Josh Edwards :
No worries because I’m canceling regardless ✌🏻
2023-03-25 20:13:12
1
montserrat.delahoya
Montserrat.delaHoya :
ME
2023-04-08 21:21:00
1
alicialong62
Alicia Long :
福。 吃饭噶手板 吧
2023-04-08 17:43:27
1
k.eloriah
K.Eloriah :
😂😂😂
2023-04-08 22:36:02
1
shomou11
ShoMOSho :
😂😂😂😂
2023-04-09 00:19:51
1
loucharchar
LouChar :
Worry both ways lol
2023-04-09 02:00:18
1
bklynmari1108
BklynMari1108 :
LOL! know this feeling all too well
2023-04-09 11:05:02
1
naomicantora116
Naomi :
😂😂
2023-04-08 15:56:39
1
theislandlagos
theislandlagos :
😂😂
2023-04-10 19:09:43
1
kelliechristopher1
kelliechristopher1 :
I so relate to this!
2023-03-28 21:53:38
1
vanessa_m_jd
Vanessa JD :
All the worries either way. I can’t handle the uncertainty!
2023-03-27 20:08:35
1
kluvs31
Kluvs31 :
😂😂😂😂
2023-04-13 15:03:15
1
erikadanyale
Erika Danyale 🤍 :
*Silently cries to self*
2023-03-23 01:37:18
1
tammybenson473
tammybenson473 :
😂😂
2023-04-14 02:02:38
1
user3357568430507
Chirp :
🎯
2023-04-15 22:24:23
1
shannonking1970
Shannon King469 :
😂😂😂
2023-04-22 13:00:08
0
somedenverbroad
Licia :
lol That's how I feel whenever a guy from the internet asks me out. like "damn why am I here?"
2023-04-26 13:11:46
0
keepingconfidenti
marketingismylife43 :
RED, marry me
2023-04-30 02:29:58
0
nikki.b.nikki
nikkibowers :
What is the name of this song? I can’t think of it. 😊
2023-07-23 22:35:57
0
To see more videos from user @northvalleygrp, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

The Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared sympathetic to the Biden administration’s efforts to regulate so-called ghost guns, which are mail-order kits that allow people to build untraceable weapons at home.   The Gun Control Act of 1968 requires gun manufacturers and dealers to run background checks, keep sales records and include serial numbers on firearms.   The ATF determined in 2022 that the law also covers ghost guns and that they should be subject to the same requirements.   Advocacy groups and companies that manufacture the kits sued the ATF, saying they weren’t weapons, but rather parts, and therefore shouldn’t fall under the law.   Justices largely focused their questions on the distinction between a collection of parts and a finished product, using examples such as build-it-yourself Ikea furniture and food ingredients.   Justice Samuel Alito appeared skeptical that a collection of parts could be considered a gun. “I put out on a counter some eggs, some chopped up ham, some chopped up pepper and onions, is that a western omelet?” he asked.   U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing on behalf of the administration, replied that the ingredients could be used for other dishes, not just omelets.   “The key difference here is that the weapon parts kits are designed and intended to be used as instruments of combat, and they have no other conceivable use,” she said.   Justice Amy Coney Barrett then asked if her answer would change in the case of a HelloFresh kit that gave you all the ingredients to make a particular dish.   “We are not suggesting that scattered components that might have some entirely separate and distinct function could be aggregated and called a weapon,” Ms. Prelogar said.   “But if you bought from Trader Joe’s some omelet-making kit that had all of the ingredients to make the omelet … we would recognize that for what it is.”   The Supreme Court has through June to issue a ruling.   #scotus #supremecourt #cspan
The Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared sympathetic to the Biden administration’s efforts to regulate so-called ghost guns, which are mail-order kits that allow people to build untraceable weapons at home.   The Gun Control Act of 1968 requires gun manufacturers and dealers to run background checks, keep sales records and include serial numbers on firearms.   The ATF determined in 2022 that the law also covers ghost guns and that they should be subject to the same requirements.   Advocacy groups and companies that manufacture the kits sued the ATF, saying they weren’t weapons, but rather parts, and therefore shouldn’t fall under the law.   Justices largely focused their questions on the distinction between a collection of parts and a finished product, using examples such as build-it-yourself Ikea furniture and food ingredients.   Justice Samuel Alito appeared skeptical that a collection of parts could be considered a gun. “I put out on a counter some eggs, some chopped up ham, some chopped up pepper and onions, is that a western omelet?” he asked.   U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing on behalf of the administration, replied that the ingredients could be used for other dishes, not just omelets.   “The key difference here is that the weapon parts kits are designed and intended to be used as instruments of combat, and they have no other conceivable use,” she said.   Justice Amy Coney Barrett then asked if her answer would change in the case of a HelloFresh kit that gave you all the ingredients to make a particular dish.   “We are not suggesting that scattered components that might have some entirely separate and distinct function could be aggregated and called a weapon,” Ms. Prelogar said.   “But if you bought from Trader Joe’s some omelet-making kit that had all of the ingredients to make the omelet … we would recognize that for what it is.”   The Supreme Court has through June to issue a ruling.   #scotus #supremecourt #cspan

About