@kuseri_:

MJ_tech_
MJ_tech_
Open In TikTok:
Region: ID
Friday 12 May 2023 12:41:36 GMT
1634284
375673
7323
16282

Music

Download

Comments

subagjarahmatditya
Obito•Ngabress :
dan heran nya sampe sekarng hubungan nya masih awet anj🗿
2023-05-12 20:25:20
7234
pppppppsjjj
rawwwww :
temen yang pacaran gua yg pusing🗿
2023-05-12 22:25:33
3132
ultraman_inah
アニメ男の妻 :
dh la aku nya single pastu masing masing tak nk chat antara satu sama lain aku yg kena sampai kan apa yg diorang nk 😭
2025-05-17 14:14:04
0
vycamiii._
🧞 :
Yang cari solusi pun tkde awek🗿
2023-05-15 13:30:12
4
hihihihhahahaha0
In Sky 🌷 :
Dia yg pacaran gwe yg di suruh nyri solusi nya biar mereka gk brntm lgi 🙊
2023-05-12 20:16:57
2790
igsyiifanurainni
syifa :
udh di kasih saran sampe pusing besoknya balikan lagi☺️
2023-05-13 15:04:59
3
reygagaul
𝙍T🚩 :
Dia yang pacaran , gua yang puyeng sndiri
2023-05-12 18:33:12
3
galihpahlevi1
Galih pahlevi :
apalagi temen yang asmara kacau, yang dibawa speeding ya gua🗿
2023-05-12 16:18:45
2
rr.firnanda
r.firnanda :
Krna nma gue ikut dalam drama percintaan mreka
2023-06-28 20:48:29
0
ilvisans0
ArumMediana :
Yang tengkar siapa yang nyari solusi siapa 😌
2023-05-13 03:11:51
3
hanakorapat_
C'hanna𖥔 ࣪ :
+gw yg selalu jadi bahan pencobaan cwo nya setia apa nggak😭
2023-05-13 03:31:58
2
acenk03097
acenk :
rill
2024-01-16 09:59:15
0
fad9466
fad :
Adhhhh
2025-04-12 09:22:59
0
zaimi.05
ZAIMI-VVIP :
mem aku yg gaduh dgn awek dia aku yg stress😌
2023-05-16 06:23:05
2
fhryzll28_
nopall :
Pas balikan malah gw jadi musuh nya🗿
2023-05-16 07:29:55
2
bya4aa
arrawrrr :
@ika anak baik🗿: temen yang pacaran gua yg pusing🗿
2023-05-13 03:18:48
3
kamuuuuuu999
ariess :
tengah malam curhat² eh paginya ngomong ide loh bagus juga yah 🫠
2023-05-12 22:20:57
3
bint.fulann_
syifa|ش :
ortu yg berantem, gw yg berjuang nyari solusii dan pada akhir nya damaaaii
2023-05-12 22:46:46
4
user886746706
♡ :
kata"temn gua*tolong lah kek mna ini*
2023-06-10 13:35:59
2
fawannabe25
𝐙𝐲𝐨🗣 :
Karna Mereka Emak Bapak Gw, Jgn putus Ya Nanti Gw Jadi broken Home🥰
2023-05-14 14:25:34
2
diandraputra280908
arya :
temen yg pacaran gw yg pusinng
2023-05-13 01:48:41
2
onlyaqilla
kill :
pas udah putus gw nya di lupain
2023-05-14 13:37:52
3
sisilakisaa
Sisi :
giliran gue ga tau caranya ngatasin msalah sendiri 🤦🏼‍♀️
2023-06-10 11:26:01
2
chocohazelnut_21
⋆˚࿔ chocomint 𝜗𝜚˚⋆ :
gpp kok santai
2023-05-12 16:54:03
2
flix_ka
nfldaaa. :
@Uchiha•Obito: dan heran nya sampe sekarng hubungan nya masih awet anj🗿
2023-05-13 05:54:04
3
To see more videos from user @kuseri_, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

🚨 Federal Control of Washington D.C. Policing – A Precedent With Teeth The recent move by former President Donald Trump to place Washington D.C.’s police department under direct federal command—backed by the deployment of 800 National Guard troops—has ignited constitutional, legal, and ethical debates that go far beyond the District’s borders. While social media headlines frame this as “military control,” the legal mechanism used was Section 740 of the D.C. Home Rule Act, paired with a declared public safety emergency. This isn’t martial law—but it is an unprecedented override of local authority that will run for at least 30 days. Key Legal Questions: 1. Constitutional Boundaries – Where does federal oversight end and state (or in this case, district) autonomy begin? 2. Precedent Risk – If accepted as lawful, does this open the door for future federal takeovers of local law enforcement without congressional approval? 3. Public Safety Justification – With violent crime reportedly declining in D.C., is the “public safety emergency” standard being stretched to fit political objectives? 4. National Guard’s Role – Deployed in a policing capacity rather than disaster relief or riot control—does this push the envelope of the Posse Comitatus Act’s spirit? #FederalCommand #DCPublicSafety #NationalGuard #LawAndOrder #EmergencyPowers #ConstitutionalLaw #PoliceAuthority #PublicSafety #LegalDebate #TLSJLaw TLSJ Position: This move represents a gray zone in federal authority—one that demands immediate judicial scrutiny. Whether you view it as decisive leadership or dangerous overreach, it underscores the urgent need to clarify the limits of emergency powers before they become the new normal. Sentient Justice Principle: The law should act as a safeguard against impulsive centralization of power, ensuring that public safety measures cannot be weaponized for political theater or partisan gain. 📌 If unchecked, the precedent set in Washington D.C. could fundamentally shift the balance between federal authority and local governance in the United States. — TLSJ Technology Law & Sentient Justice “Interpreting the Law in the Age of Power and Technology.”
🚨 Federal Control of Washington D.C. Policing – A Precedent With Teeth The recent move by former President Donald Trump to place Washington D.C.’s police department under direct federal command—backed by the deployment of 800 National Guard troops—has ignited constitutional, legal, and ethical debates that go far beyond the District’s borders. While social media headlines frame this as “military control,” the legal mechanism used was Section 740 of the D.C. Home Rule Act, paired with a declared public safety emergency. This isn’t martial law—but it is an unprecedented override of local authority that will run for at least 30 days. Key Legal Questions: 1. Constitutional Boundaries – Where does federal oversight end and state (or in this case, district) autonomy begin? 2. Precedent Risk – If accepted as lawful, does this open the door for future federal takeovers of local law enforcement without congressional approval? 3. Public Safety Justification – With violent crime reportedly declining in D.C., is the “public safety emergency” standard being stretched to fit political objectives? 4. National Guard’s Role – Deployed in a policing capacity rather than disaster relief or riot control—does this push the envelope of the Posse Comitatus Act’s spirit? #FederalCommand #DCPublicSafety #NationalGuard #LawAndOrder #EmergencyPowers #ConstitutionalLaw #PoliceAuthority #PublicSafety #LegalDebate #TLSJLaw TLSJ Position: This move represents a gray zone in federal authority—one that demands immediate judicial scrutiny. Whether you view it as decisive leadership or dangerous overreach, it underscores the urgent need to clarify the limits of emergency powers before they become the new normal. Sentient Justice Principle: The law should act as a safeguard against impulsive centralization of power, ensuring that public safety measures cannot be weaponized for political theater or partisan gain. 📌 If unchecked, the precedent set in Washington D.C. could fundamentally shift the balance between federal authority and local governance in the United States. — TLSJ Technology Law & Sentient Justice “Interpreting the Law in the Age of Power and Technology.”

About