@samiahurstmajno: Replying to @Temperance979 #vaccination is in the interest of children, so can parents refuse it? Yes they can, because the danger is not imminent #ethicstiktok #medtok #medicaldecisionmaking
Samia Hurst - doctor ethicist
Region: CH
Saturday 03 June 2023 11:05:19 GMT
Music
Download
Comments
snwrightnotwrong :
In cases where 2 parents disagree about whether to vaccinate, the courts in Australia have generally said vaccinate
2023-06-03 13:09:22
4
anitalikesthistoo :
You have such interesting content. I am learning so much!
2023-06-03 12:06:26
3
electroecler :
I assume this does not apply also if a child was bitten by a rabid animal? Or does it?
2023-06-03 11:28:01
1
⛔️🚫Lidia.mnt 🍉🇵🇸 :
there's a vacine obligation in the constitution of Geneva against diphtheria, not sending proof to the "médecin cantonal" can lead to a fine
2023-06-03 11:39:27
1
Temperance979 :
I'm now wondering if refusal to vaccinate a child is ever used as an incriminating argument in custody battles?
2023-06-03 16:41:20
1
bokmalin :
The non urgency is still often a privileged position to be in. And we are waiting for the malaria vaccine to get a good collective effort.
2023-06-04 18:31:13
0
bokmalin :
Immune compromised child? Could see court saying eminent danger, unnecessaryfurther restrictions on already limited child
2023-06-04 18:35:09
0
delirium811 :
Tetanus is a notable exception. There’s always a risk of puncture wounds.
2023-06-07 02:53:55
0
To see more videos from user @samiahurstmajno, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
© 2021-2025 TikWM. All rights reserved.