1. Home
  2. Detail

@goldenmonkey125: monyet #monkey#singe#maymun#abe#tximinoa#simio#beždžionė#enwe#monyet#बंदर#mono#বানর#singe#małpa#обезьяна#ลิง#원숭이#fyp #tiktok #fypシ #singe #maymun

monkey
monkey
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Thursday 22 June 2023 07:59:07 GMT
2312
157
0
10

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (3.24MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (3.24MB) Watermark .mp4 (3.36MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @goldenmonkey125, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Replying to @macrosarreal my cat’s cover of Yeah by Usher 😹 #catsoftiktok #TokbokiNFriends #cats #britishshorthair #Kimchisaurus
Replying to @macrosarreal my cat’s cover of Yeah by Usher 😹 #catsoftiktok #TokbokiNFriends #cats #britishshorthair #Kimchisaurus
Judge Florence Pan of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit on Tuesday pressed D. John Sauer, an attorney for former President Trump, about his argument that a president is immune from criminal liability for acts during their tenure in the White House unless they had first been found guilty in an impeachment proceeding. Responding to a series of hypothetical questions, Mr. Sauer argued that absent a Senate conviction in an impeachment trial, a president could not face criminal prosecution even if they ordered an assassination of a political rival or sold pardons or military secrets to a foreign government. James Pearce, an attorney representing Special Counsel Jack Smith, called it “extraordinarily frightening” that a president could be given such immunity. “I mean, what kind of world are we living in?” Mr. Pearce said. “If, as I understood my friend on the other side to say here, a president orders a SEAL team to assassinate a political rival and resigned, for example, before an impeachment, it’s not a criminal act. I think that is an extraordinarily frightening future.” The three-judge panel, composed of two Democratic appointees and one Republican appointee, is hearing the appeal after a U.S. district court ruled against the former president’s claims of immunity. The case is expected to eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court. Its decision and timing will determine when, or even if, the former president will stand trial in the federal election interference case taking place in federal district court in Washington, DC. #potus #donaldtrump #trump #immunity #jan6 #january6th #cspan
Judge Florence Pan of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit on Tuesday pressed D. John Sauer, an attorney for former President Trump, about his argument that a president is immune from criminal liability for acts during their tenure in the White House unless they had first been found guilty in an impeachment proceeding. Responding to a series of hypothetical questions, Mr. Sauer argued that absent a Senate conviction in an impeachment trial, a president could not face criminal prosecution even if they ordered an assassination of a political rival or sold pardons or military secrets to a foreign government. James Pearce, an attorney representing Special Counsel Jack Smith, called it “extraordinarily frightening” that a president could be given such immunity. “I mean, what kind of world are we living in?” Mr. Pearce said. “If, as I understood my friend on the other side to say here, a president orders a SEAL team to assassinate a political rival and resigned, for example, before an impeachment, it’s not a criminal act. I think that is an extraordinarily frightening future.” The three-judge panel, composed of two Democratic appointees and one Republican appointee, is hearing the appeal after a U.S. district court ruled against the former president’s claims of immunity. The case is expected to eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court. Its decision and timing will determine when, or even if, the former president will stand trial in the federal election interference case taking place in federal district court in Washington, DC. #potus #donaldtrump #trump #immunity #jan6 #january6th #cspan
❣️🎧 #viral_video #foryouu #makkah #madina #allah❤️ #muhammad #ramazan #islamic
❣️🎧 #viral_video #foryouu #makkah #madina #allah❤️ #muhammad #ramazan #islamic
A man in Texas purchased a guitar signed by Taylor Swift for $3,200 just so he could smash it to bits with a hammer... what did Taylor ever do to him? 🤷🏻‍♂️ 🎥JoeDCobb/Storyful  #taylorswift #taylorsversion #taylornation #singer #writer #musician #celebrity #texas #USA
A man in Texas purchased a guitar signed by Taylor Swift for $3,200 just so he could smash it to bits with a hammer... what did Taylor ever do to him? 🤷🏻‍♂️ 🎥JoeDCobb/Storyful  #taylorswift #taylorsversion #taylornation #singer #writer #musician #celebrity #texas #USA
スキンアクアの新発売のはかなげブルーは黄み肌の私にピッタリだわ🤭☀️ ⁡ #PR #トーンアップUV #日焼け止め #osina #推品買い #ロートUV #スキンケア #下地
スキンアクアの新発売のはかなげブルーは黄み肌の私にピッタリだわ🤭☀️ ⁡ #PR #トーンアップUV #日焼け止め #osina #推品買い #ロートUV #スキンケア #下地
The House is at a standstill once again after a group of hardline conservatives banded with Democrats on Wednesday to defeat a rule on the floor, 203–216, in protest of the topline spending agreement Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) recently struck with Senate Democrats. Twelve Republicans voted against adopting a rule that would govern debate on a trio of bills unrelated to the spending agreement: Reps. Andy Biggs (AZ), Eric Burlison (MO), Eli Crane (AZ), Marjorie Taylor Greene (GA), Bob Good (VA), Paul Gosar (AZ), Anna Paulina Luna (FL), Ralph Norman (OK), Andy Ogles (TN), Scott Perry (PA), Matt Rosendale (MT) and Chip Roy (TX). Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT) also voted against, but only so he could offer a motion to reconsider the vote. Last year, four rules failed on the House floor amid Republican protests of their leadership. Before last year, it had been more than two decades since a rule failed, illustrating the disfunction gripping the Republican conference this Congress. Without adopting the rule, the House is unable to consider the three bills that they had planned for this week. #houseofrepresentatives #congress #speakerofthehouse #mikejohnson #cspan
The House is at a standstill once again after a group of hardline conservatives banded with Democrats on Wednesday to defeat a rule on the floor, 203–216, in protest of the topline spending agreement Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) recently struck with Senate Democrats. Twelve Republicans voted against adopting a rule that would govern debate on a trio of bills unrelated to the spending agreement: Reps. Andy Biggs (AZ), Eric Burlison (MO), Eli Crane (AZ), Marjorie Taylor Greene (GA), Bob Good (VA), Paul Gosar (AZ), Anna Paulina Luna (FL), Ralph Norman (OK), Andy Ogles (TN), Scott Perry (PA), Matt Rosendale (MT) and Chip Roy (TX). Rep. Blake Moore (R-UT) also voted against, but only so he could offer a motion to reconsider the vote. Last year, four rules failed on the House floor amid Republican protests of their leadership. Before last year, it had been more than two decades since a rule failed, illustrating the disfunction gripping the Republican conference this Congress. Without adopting the rule, the House is unable to consider the three bills that they had planned for this week. #houseofrepresentatives #congress #speakerofthehouse #mikejohnson #cspan

About

Legal