1. Home
  2. Detail

@lovely_shayron: Uhhhh😩

9jakidShayron
9jakidShayron
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Friday 28 July 2023 02:35:24 GMT
317
14
0
0

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (2.5MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (2.5MB) Watermark .mp4 (3.64MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @lovely_shayron, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

بيع الدراجة النارية بالتقسيط الشهري 🇩🇿 مرحبا بالجميع ❤️ اطلب تواصلو معنا عبر مواقع التواصل واتساب ✌️ 0563489113 #vms #driver #motodz #cuxi #التقسيط
بيع الدراجة النارية بالتقسيط الشهري 🇩🇿 مرحبا بالجميع ❤️ اطلب تواصلو معنا عبر مواقع التواصل واتساب ✌️ 0563489113 #vms #driver #motodz #cuxi #التقسيط
Pam Bondi just stirred up a massive debate after Charlie Kirk’s assassination, drawing a hard line between free speech and hate speech. At first, she said the DOJ would be “targeting hate speech,” which sparked backlash since U.S. law doesn’t actually outlaw hate speech as a category. Free speech in America protects even the ugliest, most offensive words—something Kirk himself once emphasized. After the uproar, Bondi clarified that her real focus was on threats of violence, doxing, and swatting—things that are already crimes and not protected under the First Amendment. This has people split. Some say she blurred the line too much and risked chilling free expression. Others argue that the rise of political violence shows why society needs stronger accountability. Either way, the conversation hits at the core of what America is built on: you can say almost anything—but the second speech turns into threats, calls for violence, or direct harm, the Constitution no longer protects it. Where’s the line between free debate and dangerous rhetoric? That’s what we’re all being forced to ask right now. #FreeSpeech #FirstAmendment #Politics #Viral #FYP
Pam Bondi just stirred up a massive debate after Charlie Kirk’s assassination, drawing a hard line between free speech and hate speech. At first, she said the DOJ would be “targeting hate speech,” which sparked backlash since U.S. law doesn’t actually outlaw hate speech as a category. Free speech in America protects even the ugliest, most offensive words—something Kirk himself once emphasized. After the uproar, Bondi clarified that her real focus was on threats of violence, doxing, and swatting—things that are already crimes and not protected under the First Amendment. This has people split. Some say she blurred the line too much and risked chilling free expression. Others argue that the rise of political violence shows why society needs stronger accountability. Either way, the conversation hits at the core of what America is built on: you can say almost anything—but the second speech turns into threats, calls for violence, or direct harm, the Constitution no longer protects it. Where’s the line between free debate and dangerous rhetoric? That’s what we’re all being forced to ask right now. #FreeSpeech #FirstAmendment #Politics #Viral #FYP
Spread the news Maryville has staff‼️
Spread the news Maryville has staff‼️
انواع الدرجات بالتقسيط محل سطيف مرحبا بالجميع ❤️#التقسيط #vms #driver #vmax #cuxi
انواع الدرجات بالتقسيط محل سطيف مرحبا بالجميع ❤️#التقسيط #vms #driver #vmax #cuxi
Membalas @Dela Agustin962 main suling kak🗿
Membalas @Dela Agustin962 main suling kak🗿
i dont leave my bathroom apparently
i dont leave my bathroom apparently

About

Legal