@samiahurstmajno: Replying to @Doctor_Yuliya #autonomy and #selfdetermination matter, but they do not guve us a right of life snd death over our #children #ethicstiktok #medtok
Samia Hurst - doctor ethicist
Region: CH
Saturday 26 August 2023 09:49:23 GMT
Music
Download
Comments
Larry :
In many cases the parents are actually relieved that courts force the treatment bc it creates a loophole for them where they don't get shunned
2023-08-26 11:57:47
20
Thundertwonk :
In sweden, no. Parents temporarily loose custody and The child is treated. Ofc vaccinations etc they r free to decline.
2023-08-26 09:59:58
9
🦇🖤🥀saraswati81🥀🖤🦇 :
Not me being furious, again - since the concept of belonging to myself was arrogantly disrespected at UPK. 🤬🤬🤬
2023-08-26 13:34:47
8
rebeccanewell196 :
Children are a responsibility, not a possession. Love your content.
2023-08-26 21:37:28
4
PuttPuttBike :
the conflation of something being legal with something being ethical/moral is very difficult
2023-08-26 19:41:07
3
Jozo03 :
From a UNCRC standpoint, the answer is no. USA is the only country who has not ratified it.
2023-08-26 11:13:43
3
Motnaty :
there's a documentary called "no greater law" about a community that fights for the religious exemption to neglect law, in favour of faith healing
2023-08-26 20:23:43
2
VeganElaine :
clear ethical violation to deny treatment when things are clear cut & treatment is nearly guaranteed lifesaving. Much harder when things are murkier
2023-08-26 18:14:58
2
Lyds🇨🇦 :
my parents were JW. my brother was 4 had 3 large tumors on his spine. my parents got a court order stating he could not receive blood. 1/2
2023-08-27 11:34:51
1
Lydia Picklejar :
In the UK a 16yr girl was made ward of court to receive a life saving blood transfusion. She said that she felt violated (JW). Right decision but…
2023-08-26 12:51:45
1
kaprifolium5 :
What about situations with anorexia, dementia, psycosis and similar?
2023-08-26 10:29:54
1
queenvsbarton :
child and doctor want treatment, legal guardian refuses. what’s the solution?
2023-09-05 15:11:44
0
Larica Sims :
Do the ethical implication extend to terminal illness where treatment may prolong life but parents feel treatment would cause undue suffering?
2023-09-01 19:02:28
0
fundimensional :
What ethical school or framework are you applying here? Thanks
2023-08-30 16:24:34
0
Hexonebula :
also religion is fiction. so go with science, my child
2023-08-28 14:10:41
0
Kmobz :
"I am no bird;
and no net ensnares me.
I am a free
human being with an independent will."
Jane Eyre
2023-08-28 04:49:05
0
The Buurvrouw /The Neighbour♀️ :
I knew this.when I asked what would happen if I would take my baby home(I did not see how life threatening it was).docs informed us well and we stayed
2023-08-27 21:38:43
0
Misha Sweet :
In Canada, a child of Jehovah's Witnesses will get a blood transfusion if needed, regardless of their parents religion forbidding such treatment!
2023-08-27 04:44:31
0
Sad panda girl :
Right wing is willing to ignore rights of women to grow a fetus, but if you’re xtian u can block life saving care that causes a kids death 😡
2023-08-27 00:31:13
0
🚫✨🫣🍉🏳️⚧️⚧️ :
‘Merica def thinks it’s ok. You can still faith heal your kids to death with no consequences in some states. 😒
2023-08-26 23:15:23
0
Doctor_Yuliya :
thank you so much for answering this
2023-08-26 21:50:28
0
raymiew :
This one has me thinking a lot. Glad you covered it.
2023-08-26 20:22:33
0
ace93084 :
It always gets murkier when there is an inverse in the roles. For example - if the child had a low quality of life and low chance of survival but
2023-08-26 18:25:40
0
To see more videos from user @samiahurstmajno, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
© 2021-2025 TikWM. All rights reserved.