@raemboga: Yeah these extensions verified FR 💕

Raemboga
Raemboga
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Sunday 22 October 2023 18:11:34 GMT
11700
509
7
0

Music

Download

Comments

lajoyupliftingu
lajoyupliftingu :
🥰🥰🥰
2023-12-02 17:33:51
1
toosmoove92
Charlie :
😍😍😍
2023-10-23 13:29:25
1
zoesqoq
ZOESQOQ :
perioddd😍😍😍😍
2023-10-22 19:17:09
1
user815436615
Kay :
Which ones did you get
2023-10-28 21:03:22
0
callmeelex__
L E X 🤍 :
Your hair though😍
2023-10-27 17:36:56
0
To see more videos from user @raemboga, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

MSNBC’s recent coverage of Pete Hegseth, including their decision to label him a white supremacist, represents a concerning departure from journalistic integrity. Serious accusations like this demand clear evidence and responsible reporting, but instead, MSNBC relies on opinion-driven editorializing that crosses the line into baseless character attacks. Accusations of racism and white supremacy are serious and should not be wielded lightly or without substantiation. In Hegseth’s case, no credible evidence has been provided to support this claim. His critiques of DEI policies, women in combat roles, and other cultural shifts in the military are rooted in his belief in traditional meritocratic values. Whether one agrees or disagrees with his positions, framing these stances as evidence of white supremacy is a gross mischaracterization and diminishes the gravity of such terms. This pattern of blending opinion with reporting undermines MSNBC’s credibility. Rather than engaging with Hegseth’s views or qualifications in good faith, they resort to inflammatory rhetoric, suggesting a politically motivated attempt to discredit him. This not only fails to inform the public but also erodes trust in media as a whole. Objective journalism requires holding figures accountable with factual reporting, not leaning on unfounded labels to stoke outrage. If MSNBC wants to challenge Hegseth’s nomination, they should focus on his qualifications, policy positions, and record, not resort to sensationalism. Serious issues deserve serious journalism—not political smears masquerading as news.
MSNBC’s recent coverage of Pete Hegseth, including their decision to label him a white supremacist, represents a concerning departure from journalistic integrity. Serious accusations like this demand clear evidence and responsible reporting, but instead, MSNBC relies on opinion-driven editorializing that crosses the line into baseless character attacks. Accusations of racism and white supremacy are serious and should not be wielded lightly or without substantiation. In Hegseth’s case, no credible evidence has been provided to support this claim. His critiques of DEI policies, women in combat roles, and other cultural shifts in the military are rooted in his belief in traditional meritocratic values. Whether one agrees or disagrees with his positions, framing these stances as evidence of white supremacy is a gross mischaracterization and diminishes the gravity of such terms. This pattern of blending opinion with reporting undermines MSNBC’s credibility. Rather than engaging with Hegseth’s views or qualifications in good faith, they resort to inflammatory rhetoric, suggesting a politically motivated attempt to discredit him. This not only fails to inform the public but also erodes trust in media as a whole. Objective journalism requires holding figures accountable with factual reporting, not leaning on unfounded labels to stoke outrage. If MSNBC wants to challenge Hegseth’s nomination, they should focus on his qualifications, policy positions, and record, not resort to sensationalism. Serious issues deserve serious journalism—not political smears masquerading as news.

About