@lawnmower10: #しくじり先生 #若林正恭 #澤部佑 #吉村崇 #fyp #fypシ

Royal review
Royal review
Open In TikTok:
Region: JP
Saturday 28 October 2023 00:21:29 GMT
119800
1139
13
7

Music

Download

Comments

user25796920601
いなかのたまちゃん :
ほとばしるセガ愛!私もマーク3から全ての機種を持っています!
2023-10-28 05:19:27
4
nyanzou2012
にゃんぞう :
メガドライブだったような?違ったら申し訳ない。
2023-10-28 06:32:37
2
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa456
あまとう☀️◢͟│⁴⁶ :
おすしかわいい
2023-10-28 19:40:02
1
hironosuke2361
ひろのすけ🐼🚀🌏 :
PlayStationブームの中ドリームキャスト発売しましたね
2023-10-28 12:19:11
0
hironosuke2361
ひろのすけ🐼🚀🌏 :
ドリームキャストでシェンムー遊んでたわ
2023-10-28 12:19:40
0
hanninhayasu
コウセイ :
フォルムでわかるから独特なんだなぁ
2023-10-28 15:50:14
0
izudante110
イズダンテ@ISFPだお( ᐛ ) :
ボクはPS初期とか 1、2はあった 今は2と4とVitaだけ 1とか初期にやりたい ソフトが沢山有るから ハードまた欲しいんだよね...
2023-10-31 12:05:38
0
_taku_t
たくてぃー :
😂
2025-02-24 12:03:14
0
_taku_t
たくてぃー :
🥰
2025-02-24 12:03:15
0
_taku_t
たくてぃー :
😂
2025-02-24 12:03:18
0
_taku_t
たくてぃー :
🥰
2025-02-24 12:03:19
0
_taku_t
たくてぃー :
😂
2025-02-24 12:03:33
0
To see more videos from user @lawnmower10, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

No, we haven’t suddenly “solved fluid dynamics”. “Navier–Stokes solved” is a great headline but it needs context. And a lot of it.  OpenAI claims to have solved the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem. This is a specific mathematical question about whether smooth fluid motion can develop a singularity in finite time.  That’s VERY different from finding a universal way to calculate how fluids move which is what saying “we solved the Navier-Stokes equations” infers.  Interestingly, the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem allows more than one route to a solution.  Route 1: Prove that every flow meeting the specified conditions stays smooth for all time without an external force. Route 2: Find an example meeting the specified conditions where smoothness breaks down. In this route, a smooth external force is allowed. OpenAI claims the second route: a fluid starts at rest, an external force sets it moving, and its velocity eventually becomes unbounded in finite time, even though the force itself stays smooth. If confirmed, then yes, this would be an incredible mathematical achievement. But engineers have been computing approximate solutions for decades. And yes, that includes the airflow around a cow. 🐄 We can actually even solve the Navier-Stokes equations for some very specific, simplified examples too, such as idealised steady flow through a straight pipe. I learnt about these at university and they’re so elegant!  I wanted to make a video on this with all of the misinformation online around it.  AI news can often be hype, and through this series, I’m here to tell you the facts. I just released my deep dive on the Riemann Hypothesis on my YouTube which you should go check out. I poured a lot of love and research into that video 🥹 Make sure to follow along for the full series! A clarification on the equations shown: ∇·u = 0 means I’m showing the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. This is the version relevant to the Millennium Prize Problem. Navier–Stokes also has a compressible form. Air is compressible, but the incompressible version is a useful approximation for many low-speed airflows where density changes are small.
No, we haven’t suddenly “solved fluid dynamics”. “Navier–Stokes solved” is a great headline but it needs context. And a lot of it. OpenAI claims to have solved the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem. This is a specific mathematical question about whether smooth fluid motion can develop a singularity in finite time. That’s VERY different from finding a universal way to calculate how fluids move which is what saying “we solved the Navier-Stokes equations” infers. Interestingly, the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem allows more than one route to a solution. Route 1: Prove that every flow meeting the specified conditions stays smooth for all time without an external force. Route 2: Find an example meeting the specified conditions where smoothness breaks down. In this route, a smooth external force is allowed. OpenAI claims the second route: a fluid starts at rest, an external force sets it moving, and its velocity eventually becomes unbounded in finite time, even though the force itself stays smooth. If confirmed, then yes, this would be an incredible mathematical achievement. But engineers have been computing approximate solutions for decades. And yes, that includes the airflow around a cow. 🐄 We can actually even solve the Navier-Stokes equations for some very specific, simplified examples too, such as idealised steady flow through a straight pipe. I learnt about these at university and they’re so elegant! I wanted to make a video on this with all of the misinformation online around it. AI news can often be hype, and through this series, I’m here to tell you the facts. I just released my deep dive on the Riemann Hypothesis on my YouTube which you should go check out. I poured a lot of love and research into that video 🥹 Make sure to follow along for the full series! A clarification on the equations shown: ∇·u = 0 means I’m showing the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. This is the version relevant to the Millennium Prize Problem. Navier–Stokes also has a compressible form. Air is compressible, but the incompressible version is a useful approximation for many low-speed airflows where density changes are small.

About