@filmeikerfranckorojas777: Arequipa #arequipa #cinematic #fotografia #cinematicarequipa #streetarequipa

filmeikerfranckorojas777
filmeikerfranckorojas777
Open In TikTok:
Region: PE
Thursday 02 November 2023 02:16:02 GMT
346206
25638
155
2023

Music

Download

Comments

cabtours.travelagency
Cabtours / Agencia :
🥰🥰🥰
2023-11-15 01:43:02
0
filmeikerfranckorojas777
filmeikerfranckorojas777 :
Sunset
2023-11-02 02:16:26
0
naye_a_r
𝑵𝑨𝒀𝑬 🤍 :
GOALS♥️
2023-11-14 22:30:28
0
anyhelaherreraman
Anyhela Herrera Manrique :
ayyy 😍😍😍😍😍😍!
2023-11-09 17:38:05
0
antonellaulloamedina
Antonella Ulloa Medi :
🥰🥰🥰
2023-11-17 04:56:59
0
carlalfadri2410
Carla 🦂 :
Pero xfavorrrrr aclaranos que cámara es 😳
2023-11-09 00:29:50
27
17zarai
~zarai♡miranda~ :
con tan solo ver...ahhh paz🤍
2023-11-02 05:05:12
11
abso.blood
bao :
qué cámara utilizas?🥺
2023-11-05 04:12:44
8
elsa.rupay
Hey.rupay :
@Luis Pérez 🇵🇪 el algoritmo me conoce muy bien 🙈🫶🏼
2023-11-10 03:30:07
2
vilucl
Vilu 💜 :
@DAIMON si no grabamos esto, no sé para qué vamos.
2023-11-16 15:48:30
0
karmenroza
Karmen Roza :
que buen fotógrafo!! Arequipa tan linda ,
2023-11-10 04:52:43
18
minntt_182
𝐌𝐢𝐧tt :
@🦋 mucha paz
2024-01-26 01:42:37
0
gianellahipolito
GianellaHipolito :
@Manuel Sánchez metas para viajar juntos hermano 🥰
2024-01-12 07:26:44
1
alvaclau9595
Claudia Alva :
@fer 💋 arequipa 🫶🏼🫶🏼
2023-11-28 06:56:34
1
shirley.ingaa
Shirley.Ingaa :
@Angie RB @analeska espinoza nos fuimos 🥹🫶🏻
2023-11-28 03:31:26
1
arletteat8
Arlette AT735 :
Por que tan bonita? 🥰
2023-11-25 19:11:38
1
alexisjgalvez
AlexisGalvez :
pura belleza 🥰
2023-11-14 20:39:47
2
thv_leeraving
thv Gwen 🕸️ :
necesito videos así de Cusco ✨
2023-11-09 20:23:27
2
scrsss
Scrsss :
@Sora tengo que conocer cpp
2023-11-17 17:38:30
0
ly30_30
Lugyyy♡ :
Y que fotógrafo es? xd🥺
2023-11-09 14:48:55
10
dyr83rs12855
Lucerito Luján :
Yo siento que me enamore de Arequipa 🥰Aun no conozco pero se que ya llegará el momento,espero ese día con ansias 😚☺️🥰
2023-11-11 06:29:36
7
stefi9606
Jhos SMC :
pronto estaré ahí 😊
2024-06-03 20:16:56
1
yesscordovaroman
Yesleni 🇵🇪😺 :
Arequipa bonita 😊
2024-06-03 03:43:23
1
To see more videos from user @filmeikerfranckorojas777, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

The House on Thursday rejected a resolution to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in
The House on Thursday rejected a resolution to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in "inherent contempt" for refusing to turn over the audio tapes of President Biden's interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur. The vote failed 204–210, with four Republicans — Reps. John Duarte (CA), David Joyce (OH), Tom McClintock (CA) and Mike Turner (OH) — joining all voting Democrats against the measure. Twelve Republicans and seven Democrats did not vote. The "privileged" resolution, introduced by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), would have fined the attorney general $10,000 per day until he complied with the subpoena for the recordings. It's not clear how the fines would have been enforced and likely would have ended up in court. The resolution did not direct the sergeant at arms to take the attorney general into custody as an earlier version of her resolution called for. Congress has not invoked its "inherent contempt" power since 1934, when it resulted in a lawyer getting a 10-day jail sentence for failing to comply with a Senate subpoena. The vote on passage came after two failed votes on Wednesday called by Democrats to table the resolution and then refer it to the Rules Committee. Many Republicans, including Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA), did not want Rep. Luna to force a vote on the resolution, citing concerns with enforcement but also out of a desire to keep the focus on President Biden's debate performance. Former President Trump, however, came out in favor of the resolution, increasing pressure on Republicans to vote for it. Rep. Luna said she intends to call the resolution up for another vote when attendance is better. "Republican bills went down today. We will bring the vote back to the Floor with legislative appropriations when Members are here," she said on social media. Separately, Republicans voted last month to hold Attorney General Garland in contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with a subpoena to turn over the recordings, which President Biden asserted executive privilege over. The Justice Department subsequently announced it would not pursue charges against the attorney general. #houseofrepresentatives #congress #merrickgarland #cspan
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that former President Trump has some immunity from prosecution on charges of attempting to overturn the 2020 election.   In a 6–3 decision that broke along ideological lines, the court said former presidents have “absolute immunity” from criminal prosecution for clearly “official acts,” but “no immunity” for “unofficial acts.”   The decision sends the case back to the trial court where U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan must decide which acts in the allegations constitute “official acts” and which are private ones taken in his capacity as a presidential candidate.   The move all but ensures the federal criminal case against Mr. Trump will not go to trial before the November election.   Special Counsel Jack Smith last August indicted Mr. Trump on three counts of conspiracy and one count of obstructing an official proceeding related to his efforts to remain in power after his 2020 election loss, which culminated in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.   Mr. Trump argued he was entitled to absolute immunity from the charges, relying on a broad understanding of the separation of powers.   Two lower courts rejected that argument, and Mr. Trump appealed all the way to the Supreme Court, which heard arguments in the case in April.   Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, said the president “is not above the law” but that Congress may not criminalize the president’s conduct in carrying out the responsibilities of the executive branch.   “The president therefore may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled, at a minimum, to a presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts,” he wrote.   Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a dissenting opinion, called the majority’s decision “utterly indefensible” and predicted it would have “disastrous consequences” for the presidency and American democracy.   “It makes a mockery of the principle, foundational to our Constitution and system of Government, that no man is above the law,” she wrote, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. #supremecourt #scotus #trump #cspan
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that former President Trump has some immunity from prosecution on charges of attempting to overturn the 2020 election. In a 6–3 decision that broke along ideological lines, the court said former presidents have “absolute immunity” from criminal prosecution for clearly “official acts,” but “no immunity” for “unofficial acts.” The decision sends the case back to the trial court where U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan must decide which acts in the allegations constitute “official acts” and which are private ones taken in his capacity as a presidential candidate. The move all but ensures the federal criminal case against Mr. Trump will not go to trial before the November election. Special Counsel Jack Smith last August indicted Mr. Trump on three counts of conspiracy and one count of obstructing an official proceeding related to his efforts to remain in power after his 2020 election loss, which culminated in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. Mr. Trump argued he was entitled to absolute immunity from the charges, relying on a broad understanding of the separation of powers. Two lower courts rejected that argument, and Mr. Trump appealed all the way to the Supreme Court, which heard arguments in the case in April. Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, said the president “is not above the law” but that Congress may not criminalize the president’s conduct in carrying out the responsibilities of the executive branch. “The president therefore may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled, at a minimum, to a presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts,” he wrote. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a dissenting opinion, called the majority’s decision “utterly indefensible” and predicted it would have “disastrous consequences” for the presidency and American democracy. “It makes a mockery of the principle, foundational to our Constitution and system of Government, that no man is above the law,” she wrote, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. #supremecourt #scotus #trump #cspan

About