@alejachavez02: Y entonces #badbunny #tueresbichote #viralvideo #yquetueres

Aleja Chávez
Aleja Chávez
Open In TikTok:
Region: CO
Sunday 26 November 2023 15:11:43 GMT
5281
173
5
1

Music

Download

Comments

julian38186
julian38 :
🥰🥰🥰
2023-12-16 21:07:49
1
paisayorkino
Paisayorkino :
Beautiful 😍
2023-11-27 19:47:52
1
fredy.tiktok
Fredy :
Preciosa ❤❤❤
2023-11-26 18:24:57
1
edgar.serrano22
Edgar Serrano :
hermosa 🥰💕💕💕
2023-11-26 17:43:37
1
dynhzw0qiuhm
@guerrerofabian😎 :
linda❤
2023-11-26 16:45:21
1
To see more videos from user @alejachavez02, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

#Plato really didn't like #democracy because he thought that it would always, inevitably, lead to mob rule. He thought that eventually, anyone who could actually govern well would have to bow to the unreasonable whims of the mass.  Plato compared a democracy to a ship. Imagine that there is a ship run by a captain who's ‘deaf and short sighted.’ He's not very good. And so, the crew start to think they can do better. They say things like, ‘Navigation is easy! Anyone can run a ship!’ They jostle to take over. They fight and scheme to become captain. But of course, navigation isn't easy. And not everybody can be a captain. And so, the ship is destroyed.  The ancient Greeks believed that all types of #government have their faults.  A #monarchy will create a cruel tyrant, which will give rise to an aristocracy which will turn corrupt and self-serving. This will create a democracy which will lead to a mob rule, which creates #anarchy . And we go back to a monarchy.  But for the ancient Greek historian Polybius, a perfect government has to combine elements of each. You have to have a monarchy, like a consul or a president; an aristocracy, like a #senate ; and a democracy like a parliament or #Congress . A long time later, the #FoundingFathers of #America agreed with Polybius and modelled their constitution on ideas like it.  Plato and Aristotle argued that all parts of government should agree, but #Polybius and the Founding Fathers argued that a kind of creative disagreement was hugely important. We need rival voices in rival parts of government offering rival ideas if democracy is to stay relevant. #politics #civic #philosophy
#Plato really didn't like #democracy because he thought that it would always, inevitably, lead to mob rule. He thought that eventually, anyone who could actually govern well would have to bow to the unreasonable whims of the mass. Plato compared a democracy to a ship. Imagine that there is a ship run by a captain who's ‘deaf and short sighted.’ He's not very good. And so, the crew start to think they can do better. They say things like, ‘Navigation is easy! Anyone can run a ship!’ They jostle to take over. They fight and scheme to become captain. But of course, navigation isn't easy. And not everybody can be a captain. And so, the ship is destroyed. The ancient Greeks believed that all types of #government have their faults. A #monarchy will create a cruel tyrant, which will give rise to an aristocracy which will turn corrupt and self-serving. This will create a democracy which will lead to a mob rule, which creates #anarchy . And we go back to a monarchy. But for the ancient Greek historian Polybius, a perfect government has to combine elements of each. You have to have a monarchy, like a consul or a president; an aristocracy, like a #senate ; and a democracy like a parliament or #Congress . A long time later, the #FoundingFathers of #America agreed with Polybius and modelled their constitution on ideas like it. Plato and Aristotle argued that all parts of government should agree, but #Polybius and the Founding Fathers argued that a kind of creative disagreement was hugely important. We need rival voices in rival parts of government offering rival ideas if democracy is to stay relevant. #politics #civic #philosophy
When we asked our followers to send us their TikTok viewing histories, we found distinct differences in political news shown to men and women. A significant gender gap has emerged in this year’s presidential campaign, with women voters breaking for Vice President Kamala Harris and men for former president Donald Trump. For participants in a unique Washington Post experiment, that gap has also shown up in their TikTok feeds. This fall, more than 800 American adults shared their TikTok viewing histories with The Post, opening a rare window on how the increasingly popular app presents political news. The Post found that female users received roughly 11 percent more content about Harris than men did, while men — even liberal ones — were more likely to be shown videos about Trump than women were. The 800 users who responded to The Post overwhelmingly identified as liberal. But the gender gap also showed up in a Post analysis of 300 TikTok users whose histories were collected in a parallel effort by researchers at Cybersecurity for Democracy, a nonpartisan multi-university project that studies algorithms. In that dataset — where liberals, conservatives and moderates were evenly divided — men were 12.5 percent more likely than women to see videos about Trump. The upcoming presidential election was by far the dominant political topic in users’ feeds. But men and women saw different topics: Men appeared to be following the war in Ukraine more closely than women; they also saw far more content than women about taxes and inflation. Women were more likely to see videos about reproductive rights and health care. They also were almost twice as likely as men to see a 2016 video of Trump running mate JD Vance saying “I’m a Never-Trump guy, I never liked him” — remixed by TikTok user @casadimusic to the 2003 hip-hop hit “Freek-a-Leek.” Caption from article by Jeremy B. Merrill, Cristiano Lima-Strong and Caitlin Gilbert
When we asked our followers to send us their TikTok viewing histories, we found distinct differences in political news shown to men and women. A significant gender gap has emerged in this year’s presidential campaign, with women voters breaking for Vice President Kamala Harris and men for former president Donald Trump. For participants in a unique Washington Post experiment, that gap has also shown up in their TikTok feeds. This fall, more than 800 American adults shared their TikTok viewing histories with The Post, opening a rare window on how the increasingly popular app presents political news. The Post found that female users received roughly 11 percent more content about Harris than men did, while men — even liberal ones — were more likely to be shown videos about Trump than women were. The 800 users who responded to The Post overwhelmingly identified as liberal. But the gender gap also showed up in a Post analysis of 300 TikTok users whose histories were collected in a parallel effort by researchers at Cybersecurity for Democracy, a nonpartisan multi-university project that studies algorithms. In that dataset — where liberals, conservatives and moderates were evenly divided — men were 12.5 percent more likely than women to see videos about Trump. The upcoming presidential election was by far the dominant political topic in users’ feeds. But men and women saw different topics: Men appeared to be following the war in Ukraine more closely than women; they also saw far more content than women about taxes and inflation. Women were more likely to see videos about reproductive rights and health care. They also were almost twice as likely as men to see a 2016 video of Trump running mate JD Vance saying “I’m a Never-Trump guy, I never liked him” — remixed by TikTok user @casadimusic to the 2003 hip-hop hit “Freek-a-Leek.” Caption from article by Jeremy B. Merrill, Cristiano Lima-Strong and Caitlin Gilbert

About