Sarah
Region: US
Wednesday 20 December 2023 14:08:25 GMT
1340781
38490
209
111
Music
Download
Comments
mushmooony :
I’ve always had a strong smell. I’m still super self conscious about it. I also sweat so much in that area and it makes it even worse
2023-12-23 00:52:23
4245
bitch :
why can't we have at home tests for this kind of stuff or even for like STIs and such I feel like that might help a lot of people.
2023-12-24 05:29:38
1065
Laurenaa2020 :
I notice my smell changes with different clothing.. like Cotten vs spandex vs polyester vs jeans.. could that cause it too?
2023-12-24 03:57:08
1349
DontBeASaltyB :
I basically have BV all the time.When i was younger I would have it “treated” always came right back.stopped mentioning it to my doctor and basicallt
2023-12-23 03:25:47
280
Kiana Gorla :
I’ve been taking a daily probiotic and it has done WONDERS & many benefits
2023-12-26 07:03:51
157
Savannah :
i only get that smell at the end of my period, not any other time. is that normal?
2023-12-20 16:06:00
224
VivieThePooh📚 :
Honeypot boric acid suppositories are TOP TIER
2024-02-12 02:10:22
104
Raenel Rodriguez :
Boric acid helped me so much! I use it for a few days every couple of weeks.
2023-12-23 22:52:18
306
nicholemarie223 :
I never know if it’s really something to worry about or if I’m being way too self conscious 😅 it’s never “fishy” but sometimes it gets strong.
2023-12-26 07:25:04
93
Sarah :
Smell is honestly one of the most common concerns my patients have - it’s always ok to get checked out if you’re worried something is off.
2023-12-20 14:23:17
238
Kirstey 🤩 :
What if I never had a smell until getting an IUD?
2023-12-20 17:29:44
68
Aang :
I think I'm jsut more sweaty than normal so it's like a sweaty BO type smell rather than fishy?? and it's actually worse with light thin flowy clothin
2023-12-26 06:56:51
80
DELANEY :
Can you have chronic BV? I’ve always had a strong smell, so for me it’s “normal” but others are saying it’s not normal.
2023-12-25 05:50:10
5
Megg0_my_Eggo :
Ah yes, I paid my dr $500 for them to tell me I "need to eat more yogurt"
2024-02-13 04:13:03
18
Jenn :
I just got a test and got treated for a yeast infection bc bv came back negative. But there’s still some scent 😭
2023-12-23 22:54:48
24
Abys :
So what does it mean when I have that smell constantly? Like for the last nine years?
2023-12-25 10:47:59
14
leara aliza 💋 :
is it weird if I say I wish so bad you were my gyno lmao 😭 I’m terrified of going I get the worst panic attacks
2023-12-24 05:07:15
35
Sawyer :
I seem to have an odor after drinking soda or very sugary drinks.
2024-02-13 05:28:57
12
Rosa Mandela :
What if you’re pregnant what to do?
2023-12-23 22:58:56
10
Lynnlee_Kayyyy✝️✨ :
I just wash with baking soda and take baking soda baths….
2023-12-23 04:43:04
6
Brittany Wood :
Hystericomy- so I’m all closed up, but sometimes there’s a smell. Why?
2023-12-24 13:21:19
3
TemuBarbie :
Can you give tips for people who have recurrent BV?
2024-02-13 01:45:57
1
gemma :): :
i just don’t understand when i should be concerned about the smell or not!? descriptions do not help
2024-02-14 04:33:49
3
mariah❤️ :
Can I use the gel that was prescribed if my doctor said I didn’t have BV but I still have the odor after a couple weeks?
2024-04-06 02:35:34
2
Megan :
what about the smell after a hysterectomy? my whole sweat has changed
2023-12-26 08:48:51
3
To see more videos from user @teenclinicnp, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![I'm probably shadow banned Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #tjd #tcd #humanity #269 #rampage](/video/cover/7653456298373041440.webp)
