Roger O' Shea
Region: IE
Wednesday 21 February 2024 21:14:36 GMT
20564
705
182
42
Music
Download
Comments
DarrenDownUnder :
Iona Institute says Vote No… so I’m voting Yes. Easy.
2024-02-21 23:35:20
29
User 13853 :
I think if a mother decides to stay at home to look after her children, she should be supported by the state. So I vote no. Am I missing the point?
2024-02-21 21:34:39
16
Lorraine Mckenna :
it's a no on both for me
2024-02-22 10:43:06
14
Gingerknickers❤️ :
This is the best explanation of it
2024-02-21 21:47:43
8
ispin_tuirseach :
As a disabled person, I'm a YesNo. The disabled community and the carers are begging ye PLEASE don't vote Yes on 42B. Please.
2024-02-23 17:48:37
6
zaccasey2908 :
yes is supposed to help guardians who aren't just parents.. I look after my sibling s so would be good for me but I need to find more info
2024-02-23 13:16:03
6
him :
No
2024-02-21 23:08:43
6
dobbymarbles :
The fact they can’t define the term woman nor durable relationship makes me decided on a no vote .
2024-02-22 11:34:31
6
big poppa :
I really think these refs will just be used as a flag the government can wave around during the election to claim liberalism. Just like they took credit for Repeal and Marraige refs
2024-02-22 13:16:49
5
Joe Kerrigan :
Just a legal point: on the marriage/relationship vote, its replacing a quantifiable claim with a non quantifiable claim. Very bad. Vote No!
2024-02-22 02:27:14
5
Zyzya 💨👁👁💨 :
Why can’t they add things why are they taking away from the constitution
2024-02-23 12:20:54
4
🇮🇪Molly02☘️76🚂🚃🚃💚 :
There's a landmark case being held up til march 21st Supreme court. A carer & her disabled child. If it passes her case will never be heard. I'm a Carer too. Pls vote No
2024-03-06 03:33:18
4
dublinbay1971 :
NO NO 100% I don’t know one single person is voting yes
2024-02-23 20:55:06
3
user4657540095254 :
Up the ra 😎
2024-02-21 21:23:38
3
Andrew O'Donnell :
Wouldnt the replacement of "mother" to caregiver open it up for MORE people to receive benefits. I.e single fathers and grandparents
2024-02-22 11:40:05
2
Réal_mara :
My reading of both changes is that they make them less inclusive and overall worse. Getting rid of the Care article would be more honest.
2024-02-23 08:04:29
2
joe :
the new language The State recognises that the provision of care gives to Society a support without which the common good cannot be achieved
2024-02-22 07:27:15
2
Fionn :
Great to see such a nuanced take on the issue
2024-02-22 02:05:53
2
cymrucat2 :
the amount of excuses they could come up with to criticism that still won't answer your questions😳 who can say just like enya said only time🤔
2024-02-22 04:28:55
2
woomanbean :
What do you make of Family Carers Ireland’s statement responding to the FLAC take on it?
2024-02-21 23:12:46
1
Jack Keogh :
For me it's a no, no. 1. The family one seems decent but the amendment to 41.3.1 only allows marriage and not how the family is founded
2024-02-23 13:29:52
1
Kylian Mbappuccino :
Can’t stand him or Gript, but is there any basis of fact in Michael McDowell’s comments to Gript about a potential legal loophole in the referendum ?
2024-02-21 22:25:57
1
Feardorcha :
pity I cannot vote from outside the country 😳
2024-02-21 22:14:52
1
mikez :
Good god why do they have to phrase the changes in such an obtuse way so as to make it nigh impossible to understand wtf they're actually changing l?
2024-03-05 22:34:03
1
To see more videos from user @roger_o_shea, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
