@.rileywitte:

ryyy
ryyy
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Saturday 09 March 2024 23:15:56 GMT
2198
138
2
4

Music

Download

Comments

brigsecretshh
👸🏼 :
so prettyy
2024-03-09 23:29:23
1
savemefortomorrow
SaveMeForTomorrow :
so many hours 🙃
2024-03-10 02:28:21
0
To see more videos from user @.rileywitte, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

The United States is pursuing a military capability that could change the economics of a future conflict with China: hypersonic missiles designed not only to fly at extreme speeds, but also to be produced in quantities large enough to give American forces more weapons to launch. The weapon is Blackbeard, developed by California-based defense startup Castelion. Designed to travel faster than Mach 5, it is intended to strike maritime and land targets. The US Navy is working to integrate it with F/A-18 carrier-based fighter aircraft, potentially extending the reach of naval aviation against heavily defended targets. Reuters reported in April that the Navy awarded Castelion a $105 million contract for integration, flight testing, and certification work. The economics of military power The Pentagon's interest in Blackbeard reflects a broader challenge facing modern militaries: sophisticated weapons can be expensive, and a conflict involving large numbers of targets can rapidly consume available stockpiles. According to Reuters reporting in May, the Pentagon's plans contemplated acquiring more than 12,000 Blackbeard missiles over five years, with procurement dependent on testing and further implementation. Earlier projections put the average unit cost for a planned air-launched version at roughly $384,000. That figure is a projected cost, not proof that every missile can be manufactured and delivered at that price. The distinction matters. A weapon that is advanced but scarce presents different military options from one that can be manufactured and replenished at scale. If Blackbeard meets its cost and production goals, US forces could have more opportunities to threaten targets without relying exclusively on fewer, more expensive weapons. That is the strategic calculation behind the program: make advanced strike capability more affordable, then expand the number of weapons available. China is the strategic reference point The implications extend beyond the missile itself. Reuters has connected Blackbeard's intended targets to Chinese missile sites and warships, including the broader strategic competition surrounding Taiwan. In a potential conflict, China would not simply face the question of whether it could intercept an individual missile. Its defenses could also be challenged by the number, timing, and variety of weapons directed toward them. However, that does not establish that Blackbeard will overwhelm Chinese defenses. Actual results would depend on operational performance, targeting, launch conditions, electronic warfare, defensive systems, and the ability of both sides to adapt. Publicly available procurement plans cannot settle those questions. Production is part of the weapon The Navy's move toward production suggests the program is progressing beyond research alone. In September, Castelion announced a Navy production delivery order valued at up to $200 million to manufacture, test, and deliver an initial lot of Blackbeard weapons. The order followed an earlier purchase of 50 early operational capability weapons. Still, moving into production is not the same as proving performance at scale. Manufacturing capacity, testing, certification, delivery schedules, and sustained affordability will determine whether the program achieves its ambitions. The larger story is that military competition increasingly involves industrial capacity as well as technological breakthroughs. A country may develop a formidable weapon, but its strategic value depends partly on how many it can reliably produce, deploy, and replace. Blackbeard could become an important element of US military planning. For now, the evidence supports a clear conclusion: Washington is investing in affordable hypersonic strike at scale. Whether that investment can materially weaken China's defenses remains an open question, not a proven outcome. If you value getting the story behind the story, you can support The Codex Signal. Link in bio. #usa #beijing #war #taiwan #usmilitary
The United States is pursuing a military capability that could change the economics of a future conflict with China: hypersonic missiles designed not only to fly at extreme speeds, but also to be produced in quantities large enough to give American forces more weapons to launch. The weapon is Blackbeard, developed by California-based defense startup Castelion. Designed to travel faster than Mach 5, it is intended to strike maritime and land targets. The US Navy is working to integrate it with F/A-18 carrier-based fighter aircraft, potentially extending the reach of naval aviation against heavily defended targets. Reuters reported in April that the Navy awarded Castelion a $105 million contract for integration, flight testing, and certification work. The economics of military power The Pentagon's interest in Blackbeard reflects a broader challenge facing modern militaries: sophisticated weapons can be expensive, and a conflict involving large numbers of targets can rapidly consume available stockpiles. According to Reuters reporting in May, the Pentagon's plans contemplated acquiring more than 12,000 Blackbeard missiles over five years, with procurement dependent on testing and further implementation. Earlier projections put the average unit cost for a planned air-launched version at roughly $384,000. That figure is a projected cost, not proof that every missile can be manufactured and delivered at that price. The distinction matters. A weapon that is advanced but scarce presents different military options from one that can be manufactured and replenished at scale. If Blackbeard meets its cost and production goals, US forces could have more opportunities to threaten targets without relying exclusively on fewer, more expensive weapons. That is the strategic calculation behind the program: make advanced strike capability more affordable, then expand the number of weapons available. China is the strategic reference point The implications extend beyond the missile itself. Reuters has connected Blackbeard's intended targets to Chinese missile sites and warships, including the broader strategic competition surrounding Taiwan. In a potential conflict, China would not simply face the question of whether it could intercept an individual missile. Its defenses could also be challenged by the number, timing, and variety of weapons directed toward them. However, that does not establish that Blackbeard will overwhelm Chinese defenses. Actual results would depend on operational performance, targeting, launch conditions, electronic warfare, defensive systems, and the ability of both sides to adapt. Publicly available procurement plans cannot settle those questions. Production is part of the weapon The Navy's move toward production suggests the program is progressing beyond research alone. In September, Castelion announced a Navy production delivery order valued at up to $200 million to manufacture, test, and deliver an initial lot of Blackbeard weapons. The order followed an earlier purchase of 50 early operational capability weapons. Still, moving into production is not the same as proving performance at scale. Manufacturing capacity, testing, certification, delivery schedules, and sustained affordability will determine whether the program achieves its ambitions. The larger story is that military competition increasingly involves industrial capacity as well as technological breakthroughs. A country may develop a formidable weapon, but its strategic value depends partly on how many it can reliably produce, deploy, and replace. Blackbeard could become an important element of US military planning. For now, the evidence supports a clear conclusion: Washington is investing in affordable hypersonic strike at scale. Whether that investment can materially weaken China's defenses remains an open question, not a proven outcome. If you value getting the story behind the story, you can support The Codex Signal. Link in bio. #usa #beijing #war #taiwan #usmilitary

About