@officialsb19: We’re SB19, of course babalik kami ng Dubai this April 24 for our PAGTATAG! World Tour Concert. Tickets are available via platinumlist.net ❕#SB19 #PAGTATAG #SB19PAGTATAG

SB19 Official
SB19 Official
Open In TikTok:
Region: PH
Wednesday 10 April 2024 11:09:06 GMT
1142573
171004
4825
3221

Music

Download

Comments

bubzzy61
Bubzzy :
only understood Pablo 🫤
2024-04-10 11:17:45
32
angelinapayot_
angelinapayot :
STELL AS MIDDLE CHILD HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA
2024-04-10 11:35:39
765
hernameveronica
Veronica 🎧 :
We're International A'TIN, ofc we're confused about how to get money so we could buy tickets to the Ph🇵🇭 and tickets to watch @SB19 Official concert! 😭💔
2024-04-10 13:51:29
121
hannimoondz
hanji :
Where is Thailand 😭
2024-04-10 15:07:56
52
tr1stan120
tr1stan :
Where A'tin of course support kami☺️
2024-04-10 11:19:33
189
joliebeth6
Joli Beth :
Of course anu Stell??? 😅
2024-04-20 23:59:27
16
aqsikai17
Gi Leen :
Lets claim it... Sold out ang concert sa Dubai!🙏🙏🙏
2024-04-10 13:56:34
54
ms.aviles
lauren :
Justin the rapper eyy!!🔥🔥
2024-04-10 13:24:03
99
maloviar
Marge :
We're A'Tin, of course!!
2024-04-10 11:21:38
38
manowkish21
K 🪳 :
we're sb19 ofc- -stell
2024-04-10 11:31:55
55
mojicsxx
Z :
Cute ni jaaaaaah as a creative director 😍😍😍
2024-04-10 11:13:10
122
filmadetalla
Maria :
were SB19 of course, love namin ang A’tin 🥰🥰🥰🫶🫶🫶
2024-04-10 13:05:33
28
iamwinna
Winna :
justin😭🤣
2024-04-10 12:04:05
11
nashistell26
NashisTELL26 :
SB19 of course SOLID 🤟🔥
2024-04-10 11:16:59
14
zei_coleen
coleen :
aaahhhhh daming blessings today active tiktok era 😍!!!!
2024-04-10 11:13:14
118
mamootwenty3
Mamutwenty3 :
Of course, SB19 is the P-POP KINGS! Love you five!🥰
2024-04-10 12:23:47
18
ziella1979
ziella1979 :
You’re SB19, OF COURSE!!! 🙌🏻
2024-04-10 12:04:35
17
mama_rhodes67
Gizela Llaguno :
We love you boys. Hala si Justin non stop talak. Sooo cute
2024-04-11 04:16:01
21
mp_1718
ia ✌🏻 :
CONCERT TO UK PLEAAASE 🥺🙏🏻
2024-04-10 18:04:21
26
nidsriggs
nidsriggs :
Stell, of course....!!! 😍💙💙💙@Stell Ajero
2024-04-11 14:24:20
13
asawaniken06
jennsevido :
ken's deep voice hits diff
2024-04-10 13:24:39
38
bananaketchup2354
🔆 :
josh😭 not the shade
2024-04-10 11:19:12
43
k_kkk_kkk_kkk
K | 𝐀'𝐔𝐊 ²⁰🍓 :
@rmgwarrior yiiieeeee hehe
2024-04-10 23:54:52
13
honeyjidkovacs
Jehankovacs :
C langga chicken iniisip plng ang concert napagod n hehe🤣
2024-04-11 02:20:21
14
jgpzherlihy
Jen :
Fresh n ssob 😳
2024-04-12 04:20:28
16
To see more videos from user @officialsb19, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Is it ever wrong to hold certain #religious beliefs? Is it immoral to believe anything without sufficient evidence? Richard Dawkins, for example, argues that if we tolerate believing things without evidence, then we open up a whole new category of ridiculous beliefs, from conspiracy theories to the tooth fairy to garden goblins.  This idea is known as ‘epistemic responsibility,’ which is the idea that we have a duty to believe things only when there is sufficient #evidence or when they are justified.  In 1877, the English philosopher W.K. Clifford wrote an essay called ‘The #Ethics of Belief,’ where he said that ‘It is wrong always and everywhere for anyone to believe anything on insufficient evidence.’ This principle is today known as ‘evidentialism,’ which is the idea we ought to believe only those things we have evidence for.  In his essay, #Clifford gives an example of a ship owner selling tickets to a once-in-a-lifetime wonder journey. The ship owner has a hunch that the ship is not as safe as it ought to be, but the repairs would be pretty expensive. The work alone would dent his profits, but what about those lost ticket sales? And so the ship owner asks no more questions, and he turns a blind eye. After all, it was only a hunch. Is the ship owner morally to blame for his ignorance? And should he have asked more questions?  #Dawkins applies Clifford's argument to religion. Dawkins says that faith is ‘The great cop out. It's an excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate.’ For Dawkins and Clifford, when we accept things without asking questions or without rigorous evidence, we're not only ignorant. We're immoral. #philosophy #religion #atheist
Is it ever wrong to hold certain #religious beliefs? Is it immoral to believe anything without sufficient evidence? Richard Dawkins, for example, argues that if we tolerate believing things without evidence, then we open up a whole new category of ridiculous beliefs, from conspiracy theories to the tooth fairy to garden goblins. This idea is known as ‘epistemic responsibility,’ which is the idea that we have a duty to believe things only when there is sufficient #evidence or when they are justified. In 1877, the English philosopher W.K. Clifford wrote an essay called ‘The #Ethics of Belief,’ where he said that ‘It is wrong always and everywhere for anyone to believe anything on insufficient evidence.’ This principle is today known as ‘evidentialism,’ which is the idea we ought to believe only those things we have evidence for. In his essay, #Clifford gives an example of a ship owner selling tickets to a once-in-a-lifetime wonder journey. The ship owner has a hunch that the ship is not as safe as it ought to be, but the repairs would be pretty expensive. The work alone would dent his profits, but what about those lost ticket sales? And so the ship owner asks no more questions, and he turns a blind eye. After all, it was only a hunch. Is the ship owner morally to blame for his ignorance? And should he have asked more questions? #Dawkins applies Clifford's argument to religion. Dawkins says that faith is ‘The great cop out. It's an excuse to evade the need to think and evaluate.’ For Dawkins and Clifford, when we accept things without asking questions or without rigorous evidence, we're not only ignorant. We're immoral. #philosophy #religion #atheist

About