@kingsalomonnn7: #kingsalomonn7

King salomonn

Open In TikTok:

Region: FR

Thursday 13 June 2024 18:55:39 GMT

734551

52481

926

8450

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (1.14MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0.72MB) Watermark .mp4 (1.18MB) Music .mp3

Comments

Bonface Shivayanga :

my village elder coming to solve the land case 🤣🤣🤣

2024-06-17 04:43:44

186

user4086195344686 :

bro forgot his walking style 😂😂

2024-06-17 18:19:16

103

VEE😊 :

and his eyes were opened 🤣🤣

2024-06-14 22:39:03

115

Broken soul 💔 :

am looking for a rich man 😳😳

2024-06-17 21:15:52

21

gifted 10 :

my landlord coming to collect rent 🤣🤣

2024-06-18 12:15:24

13

( T. E. G. M) TINOE 👨‍⚖️ :

Does the government know about this

2024-06-20 13:16:45

17

jaspe :

il pense qu'il est devenu humain le pauvre 😅

2024-06-15 17:50:24

116

Polite :

Jonh walker🤣🤣🤣🤣

2024-06-17 19:34:22

26

Starborn chic :

when your intrusive thoughts win😭😭😭

2024-06-16 22:44:52

18

D. Emmanuel :

and he walked straight forward

2024-06-19 22:42:25

8

userFLYLI JASON :

😂😂😂he became John Cena

2024-06-16 05:38:49

6

Billie_boss0001 :

Who dey zuzu🤣😂🤣

2024-06-17 08:20:30

12

Timmy-Afolami :

not the same chicken 😂

2024-06-16 13:34:48

9

peru_2806 :

which movie is this 🤔

2024-06-15 09:14:10

6

Good :

Your majesty 🙈

2024-06-16 15:59:03

5

MUSTAFA :

Quand on dit que alcool n'est pas ami de quelqu'un vous nies toujours 🤣

2024-06-18 01:50:17

19

femme du boss :

ses qui lui 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 trop violent 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

2024-06-14 21:52:48

14

yannicka obsy :

😂😂🤣🤣je suis au sol

2024-06-13 19:49:47

5

itoshi Thony :

je suis en colère mais quand j ai vu ca😁😁😁je suis devenu normal

2024-06-20 09:31:12

5

Spicy Winnie :

my brother welcome to kenya

2024-06-18 11:48:42

3

good mind :

@Almus♥️💙:That man who always write ✍️“ what country is this” died yesterday🥺

2024-06-18 11:33:36

4

Jaja🥵🧸 :

if you laugh ehhh....

2024-06-18 18:19:31

2

ILOUS :

😂😂😂😂😂😂 c'est pas possible

2024-06-14 20:05:51

1

#NOG :

c'est pas bien 🤣🤣🤣!!

2024-06-16 16:16:26

4

Sanycleine Sanira :

não façam isso comigo eu tenho prova 😅😂😂😂

2024-06-17 21:39:20

1

To see more videos from user @kingsalomonnn7, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

El presidente Rodrigo Paz destacó que la Ley 1740, que regula los estados de excepción en Bolivia, se ajusta plenamente a la Constitución Política del Estado bajo los principios del vivir bien y la no confrontación. Según afirmó, se trata de una norma destinada a proteger a los bolivianos y garantizar la estabilidad en situaciones extraordinarias. #Bolivia #viral #RodrigoPaz #PresidentedeBolivia #SiempreBolivia #RadioIllimani 🎙️ Radio Illimani 🇧🇴

El presidente Rodrigo Paz destacó que la Ley 1740, que regula los estados de excepción en Bolivia, se ajusta plenamente a la Constitución Política del Estado bajo los principios del vivir bien y la no confrontación. Según afirmó, se trata de una norma destinada a proteger a los bolivianos y garantizar la estabilidad en situaciones extraordinarias. #Bolivia #viral #RodrigoPaz #PresidentedeBolivia #SiempreBolivia #RadioIllimani 🎙️ Radio Illimani 🇧🇴

$Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #tnd #fyp #KABP #kkkk #USA$
Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. #tnd #fyp #KABP #kkkk #USA

True talk

#sport #france #creator #streetworkout #calisthenics

#sport #france #creator #streetworkout #calisthenics

About

Robot
API

Legal

Privacy Policy