Dr Jordan B Peterson
Region: US
Wednesday 19 June 2024 21:21:17 GMT
264433
9794
624
99
Music
Download
Comments
Fredrik Wikström :
A conversation between Dr Jordan Peterson and Professor Richard Dawkins would be amazing 🙏🏼🌟
2024-06-19 21:48:44
148
hej ven :
Dawkins is twice the IQ of Jordan
2024-06-20 08:08:50
53
prettyricky :
we know that 2+2 equals four because math is a logic based concept created by humans to predict the behavior of sets when you combine them or perform other operations.
2024-09-28 00:01:34
0
Eric Gonzales9191 :
unless you verify the rustling in the bushes, you don't know if it's true or not, therfore you can know it's false.
2024-06-21 15:03:42
13
Jack :
Because if you subtract 2 from each side you get 2=2. Which is objective equality.
2024-09-05 22:01:41
1
Don't fallow me, I'm lost to.. :
..."how do we know 2+2=4 is not one of those" it's not true, or the fact that it is, so there is a 🐅 in the bushes 🤔🤔🤔
2024-06-19 21:38:32
0
prettyricky :
we know that 2+2 equals four because math is a logic based concept created by humans to predict the behavior of sets when you combine them or perform other operations.
2024-09-28 00:01:34
0
math :
it has to be true that there might be a tiger in the bushes for it to be an advantage though. this is just word games
2024-06-21 22:22:25
3
vancezia :
I respect Peterson very much, but only if he speaks about his field of expertise that is psychology. Of course he has his own opinion for other fields, but not for sharing.
2024-09-27 23:30:14
0
Serenade :
If I had friends like these I'd just sit there and listen all day 💯
2024-06-19 23:05:31
35
Rups :
He ruined it at the 2+2 for me
2024-06-22 21:54:19
20
ISpaleGud :
Hey Doc! Can we get a video about the "Watch where you go with that."? I want to see where you're mind was going in that exact moment. I've got my own theory about it.
2024-06-19 22:41:36
3
TenisonTikTok :
False, if you have an extreme over-reaction EVERY time, times 100 triggers you’ll end up in hospital…
2024-06-23 13:21:56
2
Ratface :
“To survive” is such an unsatisfying approach to explaining human behaviour. I’ve no doubt at our very instinctual core it explains some actions but it’s hardly a universal explanation for anything.
2024-06-20 14:49:11
21
Straightfyre :
if you had knowledge every time of the rustling in the bush for sure it would be better than not knowing and running, negatively bias only help if the object is unknown, knowledge will still be better
2024-06-25 23:41:05
50
The Voice Merchant :
To answer the question, it seems you cannot KNOW what is true until you interact with or experience it.
2024-06-27 09:08:31
0
idontwantto99 :
Where can I find the whole interview?
2024-06-19 22:02:40
0
Cristiano Ronaldo :
For people comparing Dawkins and Jordan. Here is their difference. Jordan cares about humanity and tailor his messages in a way that will help people. Dawkins is a Science puppet
2024-08-27 17:24:42
0
CircusKing :
the rustle in the bushes is an unknown, so believing it might be a lion is the same as believing it might not be a lion, either way the reaction to the rustle is to take precautions
2024-07-05 05:36:07
0
damien333333 :
That’s not an example against Dawkins because the reason the “negativity bias” is useful is for the time where the statement “the thing in the bushes is a lion” helps, is when it’s true. Next
2024-06-20 00:04:57
0
bonepig :
It does cost you something to run away each time!
2024-06-25 17:05:42
13
Charles Kindall :
He often gets simple things wrong 😇💀
2024-06-25 08:42:11
0
Aaron Elms :
the false is what helps us change and learn
2024-06-25 04:05:58
10
M Den :
Peterson saying "watch where you go with that man" was a flashback to his first Sam Harris debate. That was pretty funny🤣🤣🤣
2024-06-26 05:50:45
3
MichaelNjuki :
2+2 messed up his statement
2024-08-30 12:29:10
1
To see more videos from user @dr.jordan.b.peterson, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
