@familie.gambali.svenja.m: Ich kann nicht mehr hilfe #erinnerung #deutschland #spielen #fürdichseiteviral #küsche #fühldichzuhause #funny #fürdichimmer #kinderzimmer #gewinnspiel #fürdich #gewinnspiel #deutschland #tik_tok #goviral #😅😂😅😂😅😀😅😀😅😂😅😂😅😂😀😅😅😂😅😅😅😀😅😅😂😅😂😀😂😅😅😀😅😂😅😂😀😀😀😅😅😅

Cashmoney
Cashmoney
Open In TikTok:
Region: DE
Tuesday 02 July 2024 11:20:35 GMT
35775
342
16
29

Music

Download

Comments

nici9532
Nici95 :
ich kann nicht mehr😂😂😂
2024-07-03 11:20:22
1
mamagamb9m3
mamagirl1997 :
Hahaha dieser Blick😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
2024-07-02 11:30:34
1
heidi2308
Heidi :
😂😂😂
2024-08-22 17:20:33
0
ivetaiveta66
Iveta ...🇱🇻🇩🇪 :
😂😂😂😂
2024-08-12 01:30:09
0
katrinlange_official
Katrin Lange :
😂😂
2024-07-06 23:27:06
0
mariakienberger73
🕉️Maria♏️ :
😂😂😂
2024-07-05 23:36:11
0
ellen.kranz
Ellen Kranz Familie hamza fatu :
😂😂😂😂
2024-07-05 13:58:21
0
irina_vsl21
Irina_Vsl21 :
😂😂😂😂😂
2024-07-03 18:09:08
0
To see more videos from user @familie.gambali.svenja.m, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

The Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared sympathetic to the Biden administration’s efforts to regulate so-called ghost guns, which are mail-order kits that allow people to build untraceable weapons at home.   The Gun Control Act of 1968 requires gun manufacturers and dealers to run background checks, keep sales records and include serial numbers on firearms.   The ATF determined in 2022 that the law also covers ghost guns and that they should be subject to the same requirements.   Advocacy groups and companies that manufacture the kits sued the ATF, saying they weren’t weapons, but rather parts, and therefore shouldn’t fall under the law.   Justices largely focused their questions on the distinction between a collection of parts and a finished product, using examples such as build-it-yourself Ikea furniture and food ingredients.   Justice Samuel Alito appeared skeptical that a collection of parts could be considered a gun. “I put out on a counter some eggs, some chopped up ham, some chopped up pepper and onions, is that a western omelet?” he asked.   U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing on behalf of the administration, replied that the ingredients could be used for other dishes, not just omelets.   “The key difference here is that the weapon parts kits are designed and intended to be used as instruments of combat, and they have no other conceivable use,” she said.   Justice Amy Coney Barrett then asked if her answer would change in the case of a HelloFresh kit that gave you all the ingredients to make a particular dish.   “We are not suggesting that scattered components that might have some entirely separate and distinct function could be aggregated and called a weapon,” Ms. Prelogar said.   “But if you bought from Trader Joe’s some omelet-making kit that had all of the ingredients to make the omelet … we would recognize that for what it is.”   The Supreme Court has through June to issue a ruling.   #scotus #supremecourt #cspan
The Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared sympathetic to the Biden administration’s efforts to regulate so-called ghost guns, which are mail-order kits that allow people to build untraceable weapons at home.   The Gun Control Act of 1968 requires gun manufacturers and dealers to run background checks, keep sales records and include serial numbers on firearms.   The ATF determined in 2022 that the law also covers ghost guns and that they should be subject to the same requirements.   Advocacy groups and companies that manufacture the kits sued the ATF, saying they weren’t weapons, but rather parts, and therefore shouldn’t fall under the law.   Justices largely focused their questions on the distinction between a collection of parts and a finished product, using examples such as build-it-yourself Ikea furniture and food ingredients.   Justice Samuel Alito appeared skeptical that a collection of parts could be considered a gun. “I put out on a counter some eggs, some chopped up ham, some chopped up pepper and onions, is that a western omelet?” he asked.   U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing on behalf of the administration, replied that the ingredients could be used for other dishes, not just omelets.   “The key difference here is that the weapon parts kits are designed and intended to be used as instruments of combat, and they have no other conceivable use,” she said.   Justice Amy Coney Barrett then asked if her answer would change in the case of a HelloFresh kit that gave you all the ingredients to make a particular dish.   “We are not suggesting that scattered components that might have some entirely separate and distinct function could be aggregated and called a weapon,” Ms. Prelogar said.   “But if you bought from Trader Joe’s some omelet-making kit that had all of the ingredients to make the omelet … we would recognize that for what it is.”   The Supreme Court has through June to issue a ruling.   #scotus #supremecourt #cspan

About