JahanKalantarOfficial
Region: AU
Friday 16 August 2024 06:15:58 GMT
32361
1535
118
100
Music
Download
Comments
hannahmradford :
I’m still stuck on the 50k max fine
2024-08-16 06:55:53
59
nfbdhejehe :
I’m confused. What does the agreement with the subscription service have to do with the agreement when he purchased food from a restaurant. Completely separate transactions
2024-08-16 09:10:01
21
Jasumin :
I've been waiting for your comments on this! How do you believe the Australian legal system would handle this if it was, say, an Australian tourist that this happened to?
2024-08-19 01:07:58
0
Daniel :
wouldn't the contract agreement end once the trail is over and you are no longer using the service?
2024-08-16 07:23:03
25
robman2095 :
The agreement should only cover services you are contracting for at the time as you cannot predict future services or requirements
2024-08-16 07:10:41
40
ThatGirlinVegas :
Just think of how many US households have Disney+ or have tried the free trial. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
2024-08-16 06:23:40
28
Nessa N Benny :
How is this even exceptable in court? It’s black mirror twist!!
2024-08-16 06:42:14
13
ExposeChildProtectionAustralia :
I read awhile back that apples lawyers don’t even know or understand some of what is in their legal terms of agreement and I thought then that it seemed suss. Be interesting to know exactly what we’ve
2024-08-16 09:05:27
0
Mel Say :
I would have thought the theme park and the streaming service were separate entities... not to mention an unfair contact term
2024-08-17 23:51:50
0
another_dave :
Aside from the legal side, the optics are just bad. What the hell are they thinking
2024-08-18 01:36:48
0
Phill :
Surely the case would be beyond the scope of the clause which would have been to a digital content service and not a restaurant's gross misconduct...
2024-08-16 07:05:08
6
jennypencola :
Disney lawyers are something else damn
2024-08-16 07:18:04
3
dad163660 :
Justice would be if binding arbitration awarded him way more than what is available in the court system
2024-08-16 11:29:15
2
Zappydo :
How can this be legal?
2024-08-16 08:44:24
2
shelly :
Wow some corporations have too much power
2024-08-17 12:29:07
3
kungfu_powerbean ( George ) :
when you said she was allergic and she ate something that triggered her allergy I thought you were going to say that she ended up in hospital but when you said She passed I was like 😲😳☹️.
2024-08-16 10:11:48
1
josh541 :
What a ridiculous defense!
2024-08-16 10:52:05
2
LilliVT :
there is no way this holds up in court
2024-08-16 12:12:28
2
Bo 🍊🇦🇺 :
I wonder of Netflix has the same clause.
2024-08-21 07:44:27
2
Fleur DeThier :
Surly the contract is no longer valid
2024-08-16 22:45:56
1
user4351814460617 :
wouldn't the term expire after the 1 month has passed. that Disney plus was 5 years ago
2024-08-17 04:34:53
1
kenbird628 :
to think that Disney is 1 of the 6(?) major media organisations who control the lions share media and entertainment in the west.
2024-08-17 06:34:35
1
Damo H :
This is so wrong. A persons life is lost
2024-08-17 17:00:30
1
pg :
If this goes through, can you imagine how many other companies are going to include it in their small give always.
2024-08-16 16:25:19
1
LauraJaneHahn :
how is it legal for terms and conditions to be written so .. legally.... how are us average Joe's suposed to understand
2024-08-16 10:37:03
1
To see more videos from user @jahankalantarofficial, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
