MukaramKhan 3454🇸🇦 ❤️
Region: SA
Wednesday 11 September 2024 09:04:22 GMT
659396
53871
2051
2555
Music
Download
Comments
❤️ARIF MEHSOOD❤️ :
Inshallah one day me going UAE
2024-09-11 15:48:14
18
MURTAZAKHAN1300 :
Nice 👍
2024-09-11 11:19:10
3
Mk Afridi :
uffff Allah 😭😭😭😭
2024-09-11 19:43:13
6
Dawood munir :
🥰🥰🥰🥰 Allah de zama Hwage MOR la jwandoona hushalyane ao sehatoona warkre Ameen summa ameen ya rabbul aalmin 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
2024-09-12 18:39:39
6
Ahmad khan007 :
@Ahmad khan007:@🇦🇫🏳️🇸🇦🇵🇰 noor zai 🇵🇰🏳️🇸🇦🇦🇫:الله تعالى دى زما عمر زما و مور تا وركى❤️❤️
2024-09-15 19:34:37
6
Waseem Khan :
Allah Allah 😭😭😭
2024-09-12 14:37:57
8
zeshan khan Elahi. :
ufff mother your love❤❤
2024-09-14 12:25:47
5
🍂🥀ریحان خان🥀🍂 :
Allah de da har Cha moor Jana aw Waleed Saab tal Khoshala aw pa seeht rogh laree ❣️
2024-09-13 16:37:55
6
☠️ C O M R A D E 💫 🚩 :
ya allah to zamong swab wakeeeeee 🥺😭😭😭
2024-09-13 08:28:31
4
💖💖YOUNAS 143💖💖 :
هاي مورجانی 🌹🌹
2024-09-27 15:59:36
2
Sadiq :
kho Maza kana
2024-09-15 19:29:22
2
Noushad Khawry :
mau pe qurban so sweet 💗
2024-09-12 17:49:08
5
Muhammad Zeeshan :
hyyyyy offffff such me bht mushkel time hota he apno ko yun chor k jana ye js pe guzri he wahi es dard ko smaj skta he
2024-09-12 13:11:41
2
⚔️ῷὅἴҒ𝓛𝓪𝓭𝔂⚔️ :
oneday inshallah me going to UAE
2024-09-17 06:46:01
3
ADNAN KHAN :
hihi mor😭😭😭😭😭
2024-09-13 10:42:36
3
@naenkhan1212 :
nice nice nice 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
2024-09-12 09:08:36
3
zaman kochai :
رایاده..کړه.....بس..هرسه..دمجبوری...نه.. کیږی.....
2024-09-19 17:26:11
2
saqibkhan4t8 :
i love you u mom😎
2024-09-16 19:34:05
3
mubashir khan :
😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 I miss you maa Allah pak jannat firdost naseeb kare ameen summa Ameen
2024-10-01 05:04:30
2
🇵🇰🇵🇰Islam afridi🇸🇦🇸🇦 :
😭😭😭
2024-09-11 12:40:59
2
haroonhassan002 :
💔❤💔
2024-09-11 13:14:07
2
kazim :
💔💔💔
2024-09-11 12:32:03
2
KHAN 👑 :
🥰🥰🥰
2024-09-11 13:29:00
2
ijazalithanha :
😭😭😭
2024-09-11 13:50:06
2
💔💔Najeeb khan 💔💔 :
❤️❤️❤️
2024-09-11 14:06:46
2
To see more videos from user @mukaramkhan3454, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3↑↑↑↑3, if n=1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3, if n≥2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid///// twinnnnnn @فارس🪖🎈 #tcctruecrime #thailand #fyp #ai#notreal](/video/cover/7671527242266152200.webp)
