@mosquedaonestopshop: crazy haircut transformation #haircutsformen #barbervideos #barbershopconnect #haircuttransformation #haircutvideos #CapCut

Mosqueda One Stop
Mosqueda One Stop
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Monday 16 September 2024 04:23:15 GMT
900
16
3
1

Music

Download

Comments

aimet65
Aimet65 :
💯💯💯💯
2024-09-16 21:36:36
1
mmi14aa
𝓜𝓲𝓪𝓬𝓹 :
gritenme cuando se haga viral 🗣🗣
2024-09-16 09:49:26
1
To see more videos from user @mosquedaonestopshop, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

One of the hallmarks of getting #older is appreciating the grey. I don't mean grey hairs and grey matter, although those surely do matter, but I mean the morally ambiguous space in between extremes. It’s the naive privilege of youth to see the world in black and white, or in terms of goodies and baddies. But when you get older, you see more of people. You realise almost everything lives somewhere between the two.  One example of this comes in accepting that there are degrees of wrongness, and a great thought experiment to illustrate this comes from Judith Jarvis Thomson.  It goes like this: Imagine there are two people, Alfred and Burt, who hate their wives. They hate their wives so much that they want to kill them.  One morning, Alfred put cleaning fluid in his wife's morning coffee. He watches as she drinks and it kills her.  Burt, on the other hand, sees his wife accidentally putting cleaning fluid in her coffee by mistake. She's reading the paper and thinks it's cream. It's careless, but this is a thought experiment. Burt has the antidote to the cleaning fluid, but he does not give it to his wife, and he lets her die.  Most people would agree that Alfred and Burt are both wrong, and they both deserve to go to prison. But is Alfred more wrong than Burt? In some ways, Thomson's experiment resembles the trolley problem, but here numbers don't matter. It's the same motivation and same outcome: husbands wanting to kill their wives.  But is there a #moral difference between letting somebody die and killing them? And how can we explain that difference? #philosophy #ethics #dilemma #rightandwrong
One of the hallmarks of getting #older is appreciating the grey. I don't mean grey hairs and grey matter, although those surely do matter, but I mean the morally ambiguous space in between extremes. It’s the naive privilege of youth to see the world in black and white, or in terms of goodies and baddies. But when you get older, you see more of people. You realise almost everything lives somewhere between the two. One example of this comes in accepting that there are degrees of wrongness, and a great thought experiment to illustrate this comes from Judith Jarvis Thomson. It goes like this: Imagine there are two people, Alfred and Burt, who hate their wives. They hate their wives so much that they want to kill them. One morning, Alfred put cleaning fluid in his wife's morning coffee. He watches as she drinks and it kills her. Burt, on the other hand, sees his wife accidentally putting cleaning fluid in her coffee by mistake. She's reading the paper and thinks it's cream. It's careless, but this is a thought experiment. Burt has the antidote to the cleaning fluid, but he does not give it to his wife, and he lets her die. Most people would agree that Alfred and Burt are both wrong, and they both deserve to go to prison. But is Alfred more wrong than Burt? In some ways, Thomson's experiment resembles the trolley problem, but here numbers don't matter. It's the same motivation and same outcome: husbands wanting to kill their wives. But is there a #moral difference between letting somebody die and killing them? And how can we explain that difference? #philosophy #ethics #dilemma #rightandwrong

About