@7eren_yeager: البيغ مام 💔 #anime #animeedit #onepiece #bigmom #edit #fy #fyp #foruyou @𝙀𝙧𝙚𝙣 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙜𝙚𝙧 @𝙀𝙧𝙚𝙣 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙜𝙚𝙧 @𝙀𝙧𝙚𝙣 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙜𝙚𝙧

𝙀𝙧𝙚𝙣 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙜𝙚𝙧
𝙀𝙧𝙚𝙣 𝙮𝙚𝙖𝙜𝙚𝙧
Open In TikTok:
Region: DZ
Monday 21 October 2024 15:04:48 GMT
176728
11120
318
794

Music

Download

Comments

yahyezazu
Hacks Gone Wild :
Big mom will back 🥺🥺
2024-10-22 13:58:47
6
luffy_6564
LUFFY :
big mom not died prometeus thanks to its fruit, big mom comes to life
2024-12-20 16:26:15
1
wespersss
44 :
اعظم يونكو
2024-10-23 19:49:06
1
adam_zrx4
sD stox !r🫀 :
Big mam 💔
2024-11-01 17:23:17
0
so.99hmo
محمد :
نهايتها غير منطقيه البيغ مام ماستخدمت الهاكي التسلح والملكي ضد لاو وكيد
2024-10-21 20:04:25
236
bw.0m
ساره :
الي يعرف حلمها🙁
2024-10-21 20:55:51
42
anf.fna
𝓐𝓓𝓛𝓑 :
لقد اخبرتنا البيغ مام ما هو كنز الون بيس😏
2024-10-21 16:06:58
90
iwp59
rarra :
مظلومه والله
2024-10-22 00:27:43
35
5lr.1
πœ :
البيق مام الشخصية الوحيدة في ون بيس اللي تم هزيمتها بالابعاد وليس الهزيمة وفقدان الوعي ✋
2024-10-22 05:22:12
33
100🇸🇦
. :
هزمت بتسليك الكاتب بس
2024-10-23 09:57:27
14
haith__off
Kurogami 🕴️ :
نسبة كبييرة انها ما زالت حية لانو لحد الآن ما بين ماضيها بالكامل
2024-10-22 13:15:45
5
mr_msh7
ᴳᴴᴼˢᵀ الشبح :
هل نحن اشرار لاننا نحب الاشرار؟🤔🤍
2024-10-21 15:29:17
11
lel.29
🇸🇦 :
يناس بيغ ماما هي الشريره الوحيده الي زعلت على موتها
2024-10-22 07:46:56
23
79z.q
Khalid'z🥷🏻 :
نهاية غير عادله لشخصيه زي شخصية البيق مام
2024-10-21 21:31:17
29
bnlk7
aabady5500 :
من اكثر الشخصيات اللي اكل حقها الكاتب..
2024-10-21 23:21:10
5
oo_xo_o
رغَد 🏴‍☠️. :
نهايتها جدا ىَطب
2024-10-22 20:22:37
8
bimo_440
داريل \ Daryl :
الشخص الوحيد الي ما هزموه بالقوه
2024-10-22 13:59:40
5
m3and999
فهآوه - مدير الشركه :
هنا البيق مام ادركت ما هو الوان بيس 🗿☔️
2024-10-22 05:30:42
5
sukar4324
luffy_.3 :
معشوقتي😔
2024-10-23 11:33:30
4
k0.zo
Bm 🤍. :
وش صار عليها البيغ مام ؟!.
2024-10-21 23:34:02
4
dhiaa2002
dhia :
هل البيغ مام ماتت؟
2024-12-19 18:17:56
1
ha_26000
haider :
اتمنا ما تكون ماتت
2024-10-21 21:22:47
3
abu_hmid44
محمد :
عندي ملاحظة الون بيس يجي it مو he
2024-10-21 21:08:20
3
bigmon218
ᴰᴿLinlin ✿ :
💔🥹
2024-10-21 20:57:10
3
To see more videos from user @7eren_yeager, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Donald Trump and NATO: A Perspective Donald Trump has consistently pushed NATO members to significantly increase their defense spending, a demand that has sparked heated debates and tension within the world’s largest military alliance. The push for heightened contributions has led to shouting matches and slammed doors, as European leaders grapple with the implications of Trump’s demands. Some believe that Trump’s ultimate aim was to create disarray and infighting within NATO—a goal he has arguably achieved with remarkable success. However, the suggestion that Trump might truly abandon Europe and its security is a more contentious claim. Looking back nearly 40 years, former CIA Director Stansfield Turner offered a stark insight into the U.S. military presence in Europe. Speaking candidly, Turner remarked that the U.S. nuclear umbrella was less about defending European nations and more about ensuring that any potential nuclear conflict with Russia would be confined to European soil. The harsh logic was simple: if a war with Russia were to occur, it would be fought in Europe, sparing American territory from devastation. This pragmatic, albeit grim, strategic calculus continues to resonate. Trump’s rhetoric and policies toward NATO suggest that he may very well share this perspective. The presence of U.S. troops in Europe, while publicly framed as a commitment to allied defense, serves a dual purpose: protecting American interests by keeping conflicts away from U.S. borders. Whether through design or bluster, Trump has undeniably shifted the dynamics within NATO, forcing allies to confront uncomfortable truths about their reliance on American military support. While his methods may invite criticism, they also compel a reassessment of Europe’s own defense strategies in an increasingly unpredictable global landscape.Donald Trump and NATO: A Perspective Donald Trump has consistently pushed NATO members to significantly increase their defense spending, a demand that has sparked heated debates and tension within the world’s largest military alliance. The push for heightened contributions has led to shouting matches and slammed doors, as European leaders grapple with the implications of Trump’s demands. Some believe that Trump’s ultimate aim was to create disarray and infighting within NATO—a goal he has arguably achieved with remarkable success. However, the suggestion that Trump might truly abandon Europe and its security is a more contentious claim. Looking back nearly 40 years, former CIA Director Stansfield Turner offered a stark insight into the U.S. military presence in Europe. Speaking candidly, Turner remarked that the U.S. nuclear umbrella was less about defending European nations and more about ensuring that any potential nuclear conflict with Russia would be confined to European soil. The harsh logic was simple: if a war with Russia were to occur, it would be fought in Europe, sparing American territory from devastation. This pragmatic, albeit grim, strategic calculus continues to resonate. Trump’s rhetoric and policies toward NATO suggest that he may very well share this perspective. The presence of U.S. troops in Europe, while publicly framed as a commitment to allied defense, serves a dual purpose: protecting American interests by keeping conflicts away from U.S. borders. Whether through design or bluster, Trump has undeniably shifted the dynamics within NATO, forcing allies to confront uncomfortable truths about their reliance on American military support. While his methods may invite criticism, they also compel a reassessment of Europe’s own defense strategies in an increasingly unpredictable global landscape.#News #US #Putin #whitehouse #Trump´ #Europe #NATO
Donald Trump and NATO: A Perspective Donald Trump has consistently pushed NATO members to significantly increase their defense spending, a demand that has sparked heated debates and tension within the world’s largest military alliance. The push for heightened contributions has led to shouting matches and slammed doors, as European leaders grapple with the implications of Trump’s demands. Some believe that Trump’s ultimate aim was to create disarray and infighting within NATO—a goal he has arguably achieved with remarkable success. However, the suggestion that Trump might truly abandon Europe and its security is a more contentious claim. Looking back nearly 40 years, former CIA Director Stansfield Turner offered a stark insight into the U.S. military presence in Europe. Speaking candidly, Turner remarked that the U.S. nuclear umbrella was less about defending European nations and more about ensuring that any potential nuclear conflict with Russia would be confined to European soil. The harsh logic was simple: if a war with Russia were to occur, it would be fought in Europe, sparing American territory from devastation. This pragmatic, albeit grim, strategic calculus continues to resonate. Trump’s rhetoric and policies toward NATO suggest that he may very well share this perspective. The presence of U.S. troops in Europe, while publicly framed as a commitment to allied defense, serves a dual purpose: protecting American interests by keeping conflicts away from U.S. borders. Whether through design or bluster, Trump has undeniably shifted the dynamics within NATO, forcing allies to confront uncomfortable truths about their reliance on American military support. While his methods may invite criticism, they also compel a reassessment of Europe’s own defense strategies in an increasingly unpredictable global landscape.Donald Trump and NATO: A Perspective Donald Trump has consistently pushed NATO members to significantly increase their defense spending, a demand that has sparked heated debates and tension within the world’s largest military alliance. The push for heightened contributions has led to shouting matches and slammed doors, as European leaders grapple with the implications of Trump’s demands. Some believe that Trump’s ultimate aim was to create disarray and infighting within NATO—a goal he has arguably achieved with remarkable success. However, the suggestion that Trump might truly abandon Europe and its security is a more contentious claim. Looking back nearly 40 years, former CIA Director Stansfield Turner offered a stark insight into the U.S. military presence in Europe. Speaking candidly, Turner remarked that the U.S. nuclear umbrella was less about defending European nations and more about ensuring that any potential nuclear conflict with Russia would be confined to European soil. The harsh logic was simple: if a war with Russia were to occur, it would be fought in Europe, sparing American territory from devastation. This pragmatic, albeit grim, strategic calculus continues to resonate. Trump’s rhetoric and policies toward NATO suggest that he may very well share this perspective. The presence of U.S. troops in Europe, while publicly framed as a commitment to allied defense, serves a dual purpose: protecting American interests by keeping conflicts away from U.S. borders. Whether through design or bluster, Trump has undeniably shifted the dynamics within NATO, forcing allies to confront uncomfortable truths about their reliance on American military support. While his methods may invite criticism, they also compel a reassessment of Europe’s own defense strategies in an increasingly unpredictable global landscape.#News #US #Putin #whitehouse #Trump´ #Europe #NATO

About