@jibrilpro.id: DJ ELKALAM X ENTAEIH MEYDARAHMA TIKTOK VIRAL 2024 - BASS BLAYER ! Jibril Pro Version

Jibril Pro
Jibril Pro
Open In TikTok:
Region: ID
Wednesday 06 November 2024 11:00:18 GMT
289576
6633
686
2245

Music

Download

Comments

rahmaimmuett
Kel.* Rafka.p :
bagus banget sholawat nya
2025-01-20 15:23:02
7
gilang_andika_suriya
جيلانج أنديكا سوريا :
◢🕋◣            ◢🕋◣ 🕋🕋🕋◣ ◢🕋🕋🕋 ◥🕋🕋🕋🕋🕋🕋◤     ◥🕋🕋🕋🕋◤          ◥🕋🕋◤      ♥9999.9M
2025-02-15 04:53:25
15
ahmad.faisal5990
Ahmad Faisal :
pasti ada yang pindah ke youtube😅
2024-11-30 08:51:10
12
faiss_dark_system.10
𝙞𝙯𝙯4𝙮𝙤𝙪, 𝖋𝖙 𝐏𝐒𝐁 :
basss nya enak bet
2024-11-16 00:25:51
9
aditia.add
Adit SOPO JARWO :
BG izin ambil terus di posting di akun tik tok ku boleh ga
2024-11-08 15:02:52
6
arekbonek62
19 Bonek 27 :
enak jos solawatnya
2024-11-17 04:03:54
6
uyuyy294
Uyuyy ❤️✨ :
Kuranggg ngebassss
2024-12-19 23:56:20
3
jenalarifin8599
enaall :
kurang koplo
2024-12-13 00:03:43
6
To see more videos from user @jibrilpro.id, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

we unravel the deepening standoff over the Panama Canal, a vital maritime passage connecting the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. President Donald Trump’s push to reassert American dominance—and even take back the canal—clashes with Panamanian sovereignty and China’s infrastructure investments at its entrances. Meanwhile, Panama has exited the Belt and Road Initiative, sparking questions about Beijing’s next move. Will Washington’s demands for free passage, potential military options, or zero-fee transit push Panama or other global players over the edge? We examine how this strategic waterway might become the next great-power flashpoint, reverberating through global shipping lanes and economies from Australia to the Americas. Key Topics Covered Trump’s Controversial Claims The U.S. President’s repeated allegations that “China operates the Panama Canal” and the vow to reclaim it if Panama refuses free passage. Panama’s firm denial of U.S. claims and stance on maintaining neutrality. Panama’s Decision to Leave Belt & Road How Trump’s pressure led Panama to drop China’s ambitious infrastructure program. Frustration in Beijing and potential rethinking of Chinese investments in Latin America. China’s Influence & Infrastructure Strategy Port facilities at both ends of the canal under Hong Kong–based companies. Fears that Beijing could exploit “dual-use” shipping hubs in a conflict scenario. Historical Context & Treaty Obligations The 1977 Torrijos-Carter Treaties giving Panama sole control by 1999. U.S. retention of the right to intervene militarily should the canal’s neutrality be threatened. Australia’s Concern & Global Shipping Routes Australia’s central bank citing higher shipping costs due to canal disruptions. Possible inflationary effects if maritime trade reroutes or if canal capacity narrows. Possible U.S. Moves The unlikelihood—but not impossibility—of forceful U.S. takeover. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s calls for Panama to curb Chinese power in the canal zone. Balancing Sovereignty & Global Interests How Panama’s leadership—President Mulino especially—seeks new alliances but resists external interference. Will the canal stay open and neutral amid superpower rivalries?
we unravel the deepening standoff over the Panama Canal, a vital maritime passage connecting the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. President Donald Trump’s push to reassert American dominance—and even take back the canal—clashes with Panamanian sovereignty and China’s infrastructure investments at its entrances. Meanwhile, Panama has exited the Belt and Road Initiative, sparking questions about Beijing’s next move. Will Washington’s demands for free passage, potential military options, or zero-fee transit push Panama or other global players over the edge? We examine how this strategic waterway might become the next great-power flashpoint, reverberating through global shipping lanes and economies from Australia to the Americas. Key Topics Covered Trump’s Controversial Claims The U.S. President’s repeated allegations that “China operates the Panama Canal” and the vow to reclaim it if Panama refuses free passage. Panama’s firm denial of U.S. claims and stance on maintaining neutrality. Panama’s Decision to Leave Belt & Road How Trump’s pressure led Panama to drop China’s ambitious infrastructure program. Frustration in Beijing and potential rethinking of Chinese investments in Latin America. China’s Influence & Infrastructure Strategy Port facilities at both ends of the canal under Hong Kong–based companies. Fears that Beijing could exploit “dual-use” shipping hubs in a conflict scenario. Historical Context & Treaty Obligations The 1977 Torrijos-Carter Treaties giving Panama sole control by 1999. U.S. retention of the right to intervene militarily should the canal’s neutrality be threatened. Australia’s Concern & Global Shipping Routes Australia’s central bank citing higher shipping costs due to canal disruptions. Possible inflationary effects if maritime trade reroutes or if canal capacity narrows. Possible U.S. Moves The unlikelihood—but not impossibility—of forceful U.S. takeover. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s calls for Panama to curb Chinese power in the canal zone. Balancing Sovereignty & Global Interests How Panama’s leadership—President Mulino especially—seeks new alliances but resists external interference. Will the canal stay open and neutral amid superpower rivalries?

About