1. Home
  2. Detail

@yude.menndoza:

𝐘𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐲𝐦𝐚 𝐌𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐨𝐳𝐚
𝐘𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐲𝐦𝐚 𝐌𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐨𝐳𝐚
Open In TikTok:
Region: ES
Friday 15 November 2024 16:35:22 GMT
1795
64
2
2

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (2.39MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (11.01MB) Watermark .mp4 (2.49MB) Music .mp3

Comments

sheila1456
sheila1456 :
De donde es el body ? Te queda super buen 🥰
2024-11-15 16:51:32
0
jazael078
jazael🇮🇨 :
siempre guapa❤️❤️
2024-11-15 17:24:02
0
To see more videos from user @yude.menndoza, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Amor
Amor
Ngiyikinga
Ngiyikinga
رجل العاشره 🤍🔥 . #fyp #realmadrid #sergioramos
رجل العاشره 🤍🔥 . #fyp #realmadrid #sergioramos
“In all the thoughtful - and less thoughtful - analysis and punditry following the US election, I haven’t seen anyone contemplate what it might actually have meant for the country, its people and their place in the world, if Kamala Harris’s forces of “joy” had somehow overcome Donald Trump’s forces of “darkness”. Let’s stop, just for a minute, and consider the implications. Registering joy at a Harris win would have meant - what, exactly? No matter the kind of mental, intellectual, emotional or political acrobatics involved, at least part of that joy would also have meant explicit support for the US participation in, and enabling of, the Israeli genocide still being perpetrated against Palestinians. Would such a result not have also fully validated and presented, in a completely unadulterated fashion, the utter rot at the core of US policies and so many of its institutions? Would it not, then, have dug an even deeper hole out of which an expiring US empire must finally find ways to climb out of? And lamenting her loss, as so many are now doing, has precisely the same meaning. There can be no other logical possibility. While the Democrats presented this election as a choice between democracy and authoritarianism, at no point did they allow democracy to function within their own party, opting instead for the old adage from the US war in Vietnam of “destroying the village in order to save it”. Beginning with the subversion of their strongest candidate, Senator Bernie Sanders, back in 2016, the party elite continued their long-standing domination over the electoral process. Pundits and party leaders hectored the electorate non-stop to vote for Harris, primarily because of her identity and because she wasn’t Trump, rather than for her performance or her policies. Then, they turned around in the most unhinged fashion and blamed everyone but themselves for results that were obvious to anyone standing outside their media and ideological bubble.” ✍️: Ammiel Alcalay* *The views expressed in this column belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of MEE
“In all the thoughtful - and less thoughtful - analysis and punditry following the US election, I haven’t seen anyone contemplate what it might actually have meant for the country, its people and their place in the world, if Kamala Harris’s forces of “joy” had somehow overcome Donald Trump’s forces of “darkness”. Let’s stop, just for a minute, and consider the implications. Registering joy at a Harris win would have meant - what, exactly? No matter the kind of mental, intellectual, emotional or political acrobatics involved, at least part of that joy would also have meant explicit support for the US participation in, and enabling of, the Israeli genocide still being perpetrated against Palestinians. Would such a result not have also fully validated and presented, in a completely unadulterated fashion, the utter rot at the core of US policies and so many of its institutions? Would it not, then, have dug an even deeper hole out of which an expiring US empire must finally find ways to climb out of? And lamenting her loss, as so many are now doing, has precisely the same meaning. There can be no other logical possibility. While the Democrats presented this election as a choice between democracy and authoritarianism, at no point did they allow democracy to function within their own party, opting instead for the old adage from the US war in Vietnam of “destroying the village in order to save it”. Beginning with the subversion of their strongest candidate, Senator Bernie Sanders, back in 2016, the party elite continued their long-standing domination over the electoral process. Pundits and party leaders hectored the electorate non-stop to vote for Harris, primarily because of her identity and because she wasn’t Trump, rather than for her performance or her policies. Then, they turned around in the most unhinged fashion and blamed everyone but themselves for results that were obvious to anyone standing outside their media and ideological bubble.” ✍️: Ammiel Alcalay* *The views expressed in this column belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of MEE
#foryou #foryoupage #LAprotest #peaceful
#foryou #foryoupage #LAprotest #peaceful
bark like u want it!
bark like u want it!

About

Legal