no you cannot have a 100% probability that two people share a birthday, even with billions of people it would get close to 100 but never reach 100 like Achilles and the tortoise or gojos infinity
2024-11-28 03:35:34
474
MaxVerstappenFan472 :
What if your the social friend and they are the nerds
2024-12-08 07:59:08
0
James :
You can never have 100% of something it’s not possible
2024-12-08 15:32:28
0
Reid :
You would need 367 people, not 366
2024-12-07 19:37:50
8
_Menderand_ :
It would actually require 367 people cuz leap year
2024-12-02 22:31:47
7
Sophie G. 🏳️⚧️🏳️⚧️ :
shrodingers cat isn't a paradox. It's meant to show the idiocy of Quantum physics by saying something technically true by Quantum physics standards but idiotic by normal person standards
2024-11-27 22:28:31
93
🤍 :
367 leap years exist
2024-11-28 11:29:31
9
ok :
Wait can someone explain to me why it’s 27 plz
2024-11-29 20:37:31
3
Idk :
You actaully need 367 for a 100 percent chance
2024-12-02 22:41:20
5
LUNA :
so 365 people get the same 100% probability of having someone with the same birthday in a room with 366 people in it???
2024-11-28 21:02:56
0
zachh ✗ :
what if the cat meows
2024-11-28 11:46:57
25
𝓕𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓴𝔂for._.life :
No, you would need 367 cause there is 366 possible birthdays bc of leap years
2024-11-29 10:35:23
6
☣6lack☣ :
i have 5 friends
and i share a birthday with one
2024-11-29 20:25:55
3
ChaseA0702 :
don't think that's what Schrodingers cat means, I think he was arguing against that by saying the cat can't be dead and alive at the same time
2024-11-28 12:41:48
6
(a+b)⁴=a⁴+4a³b+6a²b²+4ab³+b⁴ :
not 100% there's a small chance of 365 people taking the regular 365 days and one February 29
2024-11-28 08:53:52
0
To see more videos from user @insightful_animations, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.