no you cannot have a 100% probability that two people share a birthday, even with billions of people it would get close to 100 but never reach 100 like Achilles and the tortoise or gojos infinity
2024-11-28 03:35:34
428
… :
Isn’t the first one assuming everyone has a different birthday
2024-12-08 17:29:05
0
Sophie G. 🏳️⚧️🏳️⚧️ :
shrodingers cat isn't a paradox. It's meant to show the idiocy of Quantum physics by saying something technically true by Quantum physics standards but idiotic by normal person standards
2024-11-27 22:28:31
85
Reid :
You would need 367 people, not 366
2024-12-07 19:37:50
5
James :
You can never have 100% of something it’s not possible
2024-12-08 15:32:28
0
_Menderand_ :
It would actually require 367 people cuz leap year
2024-12-02 22:31:47
5
🤍 :
367 leap years exist
2024-11-28 11:29:31
9
ok :
Wait can someone explain to me why it’s 27 plz
2024-11-29 20:37:31
3
Landon :
That’s not a paradox dawg
2024-12-04 05:53:22
13
Idk :
You actaully need 367 for a 100 percent chance
2024-12-02 22:41:20
3
de-beest :
Schrödinger’s cat is the stupidest paradox ever because to release the poison a machine would have to observe the particle
2024-12-02 20:25:11
0
LUNA :
so 365 people get the same 100% probability of having someone with the same birthday in a room with 366 people in it???
2024-11-28 21:02:56
0
𝓕𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓴𝔂for._.life :
No, you would need 367 cause there is 366 possible birthdays bc of leap years
2024-11-29 10:35:23
5
zachh ✗ :
what if the cat meows
2024-11-28 11:46:57
24
☣6lack☣ :
i have 5 friends
and i share a birthday with one
2024-11-29 20:25:55
3
To see more videos from user @insightful_animations, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.