@reactivecomputers: Introducing our kids' tablet, packed with educational apps and games! Features: • Educational apps and games • Durable and kid-friendly design • Parental controls for safety • Long battery life Eastgate New Market Shop c1 0772501205 #kidstablet #reactivecomputers #harare

Reactive Computers
Reactive Computers
Open In TikTok:
Region: ZW
Monday 09 December 2024 09:48:07 GMT
12580
59
20
14

Music

Download

Comments

safi.used.clothin
Safi Used Clothing :
wouldn't recommend buying it . it slows down as the memory gets full in just a few days and the battery doesn't even last. not quality at all
2025-12-26 13:51:57
1
reactivecomputers
Reactive Computers :
$55
2025-11-13 19:56:45
1
arthurfordperfumes
M & C Superior Brands :
hw much?
2025-02-09 06:22:49
0
tyra5336
tyra :
how much
2025-04-07 09:46:14
1
jahricha7traveltours
Mabiks :
how much
2025-08-09 08:08:02
0
reactivecomputers
Reactive Computers :
60
2025-11-13 19:58:54
1
reactivecomputers
Reactive Computers :
$50
2025-11-13 19:57:43
0
reactivecomputers
Reactive Computers :
$55
2025-11-13 19:57:00
0
reactivecomputers
Reactive Computers :
$50
2025-11-13 19:56:20
0
reactivecomputers
Reactive Computers :
$50
2025-11-13 19:57:20
0
getrudechiwara8
Getrude chiwara :
how much tsblet
2025-11-27 11:48:24
0
leilalaika
it's obviously me :
😁
2025-11-12 07:55:26
1
grashyrangwani
kaira :
🥰
2025-04-08 20:40:15
0
nancyrukweza
NEE♥️ :
ndikuda 1
2025-05-06 10:59:43
0
To see more videos from user @reactivecomputers, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

A recent New York Times article highlighted a new study reporting that circulating (whole blood) NAD+ levels remain relatively stable with age in humans. That’s an interesting finding. But before we throw out decades of aging research, it’s important to understand what the study does and does not show. What it DOES show: ✅ Whole blood NAD+ levels may not decline significantly with age. ✅ Blood NAD+ may not be a reliable biomarker of biological aging. ✅ We should be careful about making broad claims that are not supported by human data. What it DOES NOT show: ❌ That NAD+ is irrelevant to aging. ❌ That NAD+ does not decline in specific tissues (like skin, muscle and brain) ❌ That the thousands of studies on NAD+, sirtuins, CD38, mitochondrial function, and aging biology are suddenly invalid. The real question has always been: What is happening inside the tissues and inside the mitochondria that matter most for aging? Muscle. Brain. Liver. Skin. Mitochondria. Many of the foundational papers in the field suggest NAD+ declines in specific tissues, particularly in animal models and age-related disease states. The human story is more complex and continues to evolve. This is how science works. One new paper doesn’t overturn an entire field. It becomes part of the evidence, and then we reevaluate what we think we know. We learn more, we get better, we refine.  As a scientist, that’s the part I find most interesting. #longevity #healthyaging #mitochondria #NAD #Science  Educational purposes only. Not medical advice.
A recent New York Times article highlighted a new study reporting that circulating (whole blood) NAD+ levels remain relatively stable with age in humans. That’s an interesting finding. But before we throw out decades of aging research, it’s important to understand what the study does and does not show. What it DOES show: ✅ Whole blood NAD+ levels may not decline significantly with age. ✅ Blood NAD+ may not be a reliable biomarker of biological aging. ✅ We should be careful about making broad claims that are not supported by human data. What it DOES NOT show: ❌ That NAD+ is irrelevant to aging. ❌ That NAD+ does not decline in specific tissues (like skin, muscle and brain) ❌ That the thousands of studies on NAD+, sirtuins, CD38, mitochondrial function, and aging biology are suddenly invalid. The real question has always been: What is happening inside the tissues and inside the mitochondria that matter most for aging? Muscle. Brain. Liver. Skin. Mitochondria. Many of the foundational papers in the field suggest NAD+ declines in specific tissues, particularly in animal models and age-related disease states. The human story is more complex and continues to evolve. This is how science works. One new paper doesn’t overturn an entire field. It becomes part of the evidence, and then we reevaluate what we think we know. We learn more, we get better, we refine. As a scientist, that’s the part I find most interesting. #longevity #healthyaging #mitochondria #NAD #Science Educational purposes only. Not medical advice.

About