@itsnotmadiijae: #fypシ゚ #fyp #wicked #wickedmovie

madi jae

Open In TikTok:

Region: US

Sunday 15 December 2024 06:32:49 GMT

790546

127404

266

6429

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (0MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (0MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

ur gay neighbor :

HAHAHA WAIT HOI POLLOI ARE THE REAL LYRICS?! yaaaall ive been listening to Wicked for 20 years and didnt know

2024-12-18 05:18:46

4083

frogslut 🍉 :

i can’t stop saying “i wanna be in [happy] MIHOY MINOYY [happy]”

2024-12-17 19:30:51

8201

♫𝒮𝒸𝓎𝓁𝓁𝒶♫ :

NO ITS NOT HOI POLLOI ITS VOCALOID

2024-12-20 01:23:20

15

Fruitycinnamonbun :

WAIT I JUST LOOKED IT UP AND THOSE ARE THE REAL LYRICS?!??!

2024-12-17 05:43:19

3445

Violin_ab🌸 :

What do you mean it doesn’t say “in this home for life”?

2024-12-17 19:48:59

456

Veronica :

it scratches my brain sooooo well

2024-12-15 17:20:00

2792

Ty💗 :

I personally can’t stop saying “OH MA HAAAAAA” 🤣

2024-12-20 02:45:08

128

eejo96 :

It’s also the way their dresses swish so perfectly during this moment too.

2024-12-17 03:45:36

550

A⸆⸉ :

i thought it was “in this life alone” 😭😭

2024-12-19 22:21:30

40

Mel Lussier :

my whole life I thought it was “I want to be in this life alone”

2024-12-20 00:16:05

64

arazae :

them basically belting they wanna be there with the commoners is really what gets me

2024-12-17 20:35:18

1274

strwbπy• :

is it English?

2024-12-18 02:23:49

4

Nacho Blue :

I thought they said "place for life"??? 😭

2024-12-18 23:43:16

63

Dante :

I have no one to send this to but I have been doing this since I saw the lyrics

2024-12-15 15:58:40

92

SmAsianPotato :

Me & my bestie DIED when we had to sing this 10 years ago in HS chorus lmaooo it’s so nonsensical

2024-12-30 13:23:54

0

pleasesuffok8 :

I seriously thought I was mishearing it. I just looked it up and wow

2024-12-17 15:23:12

71

Moriah :

It’s so gooooooooooood

2024-12-15 18:12:21

30

lauren⸆⸉ :

and i always do the shoulder thing when we says “i think we’ve found the place where we belonngggg”

2024-12-17 22:25:29

32

mclovin :

i only knew those words from john travolta in hairspray💔

2024-12-18 01:12:57

19

mau_edits_93 :

As an ex student of ancient greek in italy, I've just figured out what this means. In ancient greek "οι πολλοι" means "the many", so the people, the people of the emerald city in this case.

2025-01-14 23:47:47

3

nala 💗 :

IVE FOUND MY PEOPLE

2024-12-17 20:54:44

9

Jordan 🤪✌🏻 :

Finally one for me🥳

2024-12-17 05:13:53

7

grace :

I need them to put the songs visuals on YouTube pls

2024-12-17 15:02:15

14

khel :

i felt attacked

2024-12-17 20:56:27

4

Sophia'sLoveLetters :

i heard store galore the first time 🤭

2024-12-18 02:55:23

4

To see more videos from user @itsnotmadiijae, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

SOUND TING TING CALISROX #djkane🗿🤙 #fypシ

SOUND TING TING CALISROX #djkane🗿🤙 #fypシ

tipis

Juego: Schoolboy runaway, Día 5/362 recomendando juegos #gaming #schoolboyrunaway #horrorgame #indigame #indigames #elmeap

Juego: Schoolboy runaway, Día 5/362 recomendando juegos #gaming #schoolboyrunaway #horrorgame #indigame #indigames #elmeap

#Antalya Side#türkei #

#Antalya Side#türkei #

Suddenly, like a scene straight out of Forrest Gump, a so-called “sand guard” approaches, arms crossed, authority unearned, declaring, “You can’t sit here.” Despite being at the line where wet sand meets dry, where tidal waters have freely ebbed and flowed for centuries, this self-proclaimed beach boss insists that you move. It’s a moment that feels more like a civil rights standoff than a simple beach day inconvenience. This scenario, playing out with increasing frequency on Florida’s beaches, raises serious questions about the violation of public access rights and the unchecked power of private property claims. The Customary Use Doctrine: A Right to Access Florida’s beaches have long been governed by the principle of “customary use,” which asserts that the public has a historic right to access and use sandy shorelines for recreation. This principle stems from common law, recognizing that areas where the public has traditionally gathered, such as beaches, remain accessible to all. However, a 2018 Florida law (HB 631) shifted the burden to local governments to prove customary use rights through the courts, opening the door for private beachfront property owners to challenge access rights. This legal shift emboldened some beachfront owners to deploy “sand guards” — private security or self-appointed enforcers — to shoo beachgoers off so-called “private” sand. When a sand guard tells you that you “can’t sit here,” it’s not just a nuisance — it’s a direct infringement on your civil rights. Public access to beaches is a fundamental right deeply rooted in principles of equal access to public spaces. Beaches are not luxury commodities reserved for a select few; they are shared resources meant for the enjoyment of all. The civil rights movement fought for the right to access lunch counters, buses, and public parks. Today, beaches are no different. The sand guard’s command to “move along” echoes the exclusionary tactics of segregation, where marginalized groups were told they had no right to occupy certain spaces. It’s a chilling reminder that the fight for public access is ongoing, and it’s now playing out on the shoreline. The Public vs. The Private Claim One of the most contentious elements of the beach access debate is where private ownership ends and public access begins. Legally, the public’s access extends to the mean high tide line — the wet sand. But tides are fluid, and the line between wet and dry sand isn’t a hard border. Sand guards often exploit this ambiguity, insisting that beachgoers are on “private property” when, in reality, they are well within the public boundary. Unlike a fence or wall marking private property on land, the beach has no such clear division, allowing sand guards to enforce arbitrary, self-serving borders. This overreach highlights the very reason why the public’s civil rights must be protected: without oversight, those with perceived authority will continue to claim space that does not belong to them. Sand Guards as Public Nuisances If the sand guard’s goal is to uphold “private property rights,” their methods do the opposite, serving as a nuisance to the public and local authorities alike. Their presence interrupts peaceful enjoyment of public space, escalates tensions, and wastes community resources when police or code enforcement must respond. The irony is clear: they claim to protect “order” but instead bring disorder. Residents and tourists alike are subjected to harassment and intimidation as the guards operate with vague, unofficial authority. This overreach creates a hostile environment, deterring beachgoers from exercising their rightful access to public land. Such behavior mirrors the concept of a “public nuisance,” which is defined in legal terms as an action that interferes with the public’s right to enjoy public space. When sand guards interfere with your ability to enjoy the beach, they’re not just annoying — they’re acting as de facto public nuisances.

Suddenly, like a scene straight out of Forrest Gump, a so-called “sand guard” approaches, arms crossed, authority unearned, declaring, “You can’t sit here.” Despite being at the line where wet sand meets dry, where tidal waters have freely ebbed and flowed for centuries, this self-proclaimed beach boss insists that you move. It’s a moment that feels more like a civil rights standoff than a simple beach day inconvenience. This scenario, playing out with increasing frequency on Florida’s beaches, raises serious questions about the violation of public access rights and the unchecked power of private property claims. The Customary Use Doctrine: A Right to Access Florida’s beaches have long been governed by the principle of “customary use,” which asserts that the public has a historic right to access and use sandy shorelines for recreation. This principle stems from common law, recognizing that areas where the public has traditionally gathered, such as beaches, remain accessible to all. However, a 2018 Florida law (HB 631) shifted the burden to local governments to prove customary use rights through the courts, opening the door for private beachfront property owners to challenge access rights. This legal shift emboldened some beachfront owners to deploy “sand guards” — private security or self-appointed enforcers — to shoo beachgoers off so-called “private” sand. When a sand guard tells you that you “can’t sit here,” it’s not just a nuisance — it’s a direct infringement on your civil rights. Public access to beaches is a fundamental right deeply rooted in principles of equal access to public spaces. Beaches are not luxury commodities reserved for a select few; they are shared resources meant for the enjoyment of all. The civil rights movement fought for the right to access lunch counters, buses, and public parks. Today, beaches are no different. The sand guard’s command to “move along” echoes the exclusionary tactics of segregation, where marginalized groups were told they had no right to occupy certain spaces. It’s a chilling reminder that the fight for public access is ongoing, and it’s now playing out on the shoreline. The Public vs. The Private Claim One of the most contentious elements of the beach access debate is where private ownership ends and public access begins. Legally, the public’s access extends to the mean high tide line — the wet sand. But tides are fluid, and the line between wet and dry sand isn’t a hard border. Sand guards often exploit this ambiguity, insisting that beachgoers are on “private property” when, in reality, they are well within the public boundary. Unlike a fence or wall marking private property on land, the beach has no such clear division, allowing sand guards to enforce arbitrary, self-serving borders. This overreach highlights the very reason why the public’s civil rights must be protected: without oversight, those with perceived authority will continue to claim space that does not belong to them. Sand Guards as Public Nuisances If the sand guard’s goal is to uphold “private property rights,” their methods do the opposite, serving as a nuisance to the public and local authorities alike. Their presence interrupts peaceful enjoyment of public space, escalates tensions, and wastes community resources when police or code enforcement must respond. The irony is clear: they claim to protect “order” but instead bring disorder. Residents and tourists alike are subjected to harassment and intimidation as the guards operate with vague, unofficial authority. This overreach creates a hostile environment, deterring beachgoers from exercising their rightful access to public land. Such behavior mirrors the concept of a “public nuisance,” which is defined in legal terms as an action that interferes with the public’s right to enjoy public space. When sand guards interfere with your ability to enjoy the beach, they’re not just annoying — they’re acting as de facto public nuisances.

About

Robot

Legal

Privacy Policy