@crown_club_kz: Когда рулили инженеры, а не маркетологи #mitsubishigto #mitsubishi3000gt #toyotasoarer #toyotamark2 #jdm

𝐂𝐑𝐎𝐖𝐍 𝐂𝐋𝐔𝐁 𝐊𝐙

Open In TikTok:

Region: KZ

Monday 16 December 2024 06:00:42 GMT

198779

9530

78

982

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (1.85MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (1.7MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

̶К̶̶т̶̶о̶̶-̶̶т̶̶о̶ :

время когда каждый старался сделать что-то новое и удивить, а не копировать у других

2024-12-16 07:22:06

436

ljosalfheimr :

У гто (3000gt) ещё была подруливающая задняя ось как у гтр'ом

2024-12-16 10:00:19

81

user9857490424397 :

автоваз тоже удивляет 😂 С каждым разом ,разное Уг выпускает

2024-12-16 20:28:37

6

SOFTLINE :

японцы вещи делают покрайней мере в 60х-2005 делали

2024-12-16 14:46:39

15

𝐄𝐢𝐢𝐜𝐡𝐢 𝐘𝐨𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐝𝐚 :

что за тачка которая открывает крышу?

2024-12-16 13:36:38

3

▬▬ι═══════ﺤ :

*любили- пр. время

2024-12-16 15:31:46

2

Kiryusha Reid :

Да кто мне объяснит почему Toyota у японцев это сверх,а мазда отрыжка с дорогими запчастями?🥺

2025-02-28 19:50:13

0

__ADAM :

а что за машина 2 которая кабриолет?

2025-01-06 18:44:21

0

JluceHok_u3_MuHcka :

да это и сейчас офигенно

2024-12-16 18:15:41

4

Ivan Dyachkov :

Так это маркетологи сказали ставить

2024-12-19 07:56:02

2

V@siya :

Дааа,делали же авто для людей,теперь для денег только!

2024-12-19 05:42:20

2

initial d street stage :

Верните производство епонцев😭😭😭😭

2024-12-17 19:27:01

2

user901008090 :

Угу, машины тоже были разными как телефоны нокиа😁 Сейчас однотипные авто, и краски тоже

2024-12-17 08:19:19

2

KING. :

У соседа мазда купе 80х годов, восстановил перебрал мотор. Машина зверь ревёт и мощь прет.

2024-12-16 17:44:38

2

DmytroVilia :

Да уж, не в той стране я появился на свет!

2025-01-07 13:35:30

1

TRVP D1LLER :

как я кайфую от этих машин 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

2024-12-21 20:09:58

1

Виталий Дрова :

на прелюде ещё есть задняя рейка

2024-12-17 08:47:07

1

Система Оповещения :

в моём городе, ездет точно такой же соарер как и на видео(белый тарго/кабриолет, сам хз к какому кузову относится)

2024-12-16 14:28:03

1

orynbassarr :

Инженеру руки целовал

2025-03-07 14:25:20

0

@struna@$$$ :

Я буду скучать 🥺🥺🥺

2025-02-06 07:48:19

0

Pixie :

японская класика 🥰

2025-01-15 14:44:39

0

лёха :

японцы делают вещи

2025-01-08 17:49:36

0

🕷️ :

@mara_gto1

2024-12-16 19:13:11

2

𝙆𝙖𝙧𝙙𝙞𝙤𝙡𝙤𝙜🪐🌍 :

🔥🔥🔥

2024-12-22 07:14:06

1

ВІТАЛІЙ :

🔥🔥🔥

2024-12-21 17:45:44

1

To see more videos from user @crown_club_kz, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

#2025 #priest #morelikes #fyyyyyppppp #fyp #tictok #capcut

#2025 #priest #morelikes #fyyyyyppppp #fyp #tictok #capcut

Liberty Market Lahore 🩶 #tiktok #viral #foryou #view #lahore #pakistan #dji #dronevideo

Liberty Market Lahore 🩶 #tiktok #viral #foryou #view #lahore #pakistan #dji #dronevideo

🔴 CAPTION 🔴 Matt seems to hold to a radicalized version of New Covenant Theology (NCT). NCT sees a strong discontinuity between the Old and New Covenants, believes the Mosaic Law is entirely abrogated - including the 10 Commandments (moral law), and emphasizes that Christ is the only law-giver for the Christian. Matt’s radicalized version of NCT goes further, essentially denying that the believer’s life should be shaped by biblical imperatives grounded in the OT moral law, and teaching that the only law Christians are to follow is “believe and love.” This leads Matt to frame concepts like repentance and personal holiness as legalism. When these guys say things like this, or like “Peter killed Ananias and Saphira,” there is a whole misguided theological system behind it. This is why Matt teaches that James did not understand the gospel when he wrote his epistle. His theological system cannot handle imperatives rooted in the moral law given in the Old Testament. Everything must be filtered through the specific words of Jesus. Yet even Jesus’ words before the cross may be irrelevant unless they are filtered through a hyper-grace lens. Matt sees anything before the cross as law-based, and therefore irrelevant to New Covenant Christians. These antinomian (without law) tendencies lead Matt to reject the ongoing need for repentance and growth in holiness, and ultimately sever a Christian’s hope for living faithfully under the New Covenant. Matt rejects the Lord’s Prayer contradicts his hyper-grace theology that denies the believer’s ongoing struggle with sin, need for repentance, and obligation to obey Christ’s commands. In Matt McMillen’s teaching, “not under law” means: 1) Christians are not bound to any moral commands—not even the Ten Commandments. 2) There’s no obligation to repent, obey, or be instructed. 3) Sanctification is automatic, not something you pursue. 4) Even Jesus’ own commands (pre-cross) don’t apply. What to Bible means: 1) Not under the law as a system of condemnation. 2) Under grace as a new covenant power to obey. 3) Free from the law’s curse, not from God’s moral will. #holynope #nope

🔴 CAPTION 🔴 Matt seems to hold to a radicalized version of New Covenant Theology (NCT). NCT sees a strong discontinuity between the Old and New Covenants, believes the Mosaic Law is entirely abrogated - including the 10 Commandments (moral law), and emphasizes that Christ is the only law-giver for the Christian. Matt’s radicalized version of NCT goes further, essentially denying that the believer’s life should be shaped by biblical imperatives grounded in the OT moral law, and teaching that the only law Christians are to follow is “believe and love.” This leads Matt to frame concepts like repentance and personal holiness as legalism. When these guys say things like this, or like “Peter killed Ananias and Saphira,” there is a whole misguided theological system behind it. This is why Matt teaches that James did not understand the gospel when he wrote his epistle. His theological system cannot handle imperatives rooted in the moral law given in the Old Testament. Everything must be filtered through the specific words of Jesus. Yet even Jesus’ words before the cross may be irrelevant unless they are filtered through a hyper-grace lens. Matt sees anything before the cross as law-based, and therefore irrelevant to New Covenant Christians. These antinomian (without law) tendencies lead Matt to reject the ongoing need for repentance and growth in holiness, and ultimately sever a Christian’s hope for living faithfully under the New Covenant. Matt rejects the Lord’s Prayer contradicts his hyper-grace theology that denies the believer’s ongoing struggle with sin, need for repentance, and obligation to obey Christ’s commands. In Matt McMillen’s teaching, “not under law” means: 1) Christians are not bound to any moral commands—not even the Ten Commandments. 2) There’s no obligation to repent, obey, or be instructed. 3) Sanctification is automatic, not something you pursue. 4) Even Jesus’ own commands (pre-cross) don’t apply. What to Bible means: 1) Not under the law as a system of condemnation. 2) Under grace as a new covenant power to obey. 3) Free from the law’s curse, not from God’s moral will. #holynope #nope

🔴 CAPTION 🔴 Matt seems to hold to a radicalized version of New Covenant Theology (NCT). NCT sees a strong discontinuity between the Old and New Covenants, believes the Mosaic Law is entirely abrogated - including the 10 Commandments (moral law), and emphasizes that Christ is the only law-giver for the Christian. Matt’s radicalized version of NCT goes further, essentially denying that the believer’s life should be shaped by biblical imperatives grounded in the OT moral law, and teaching that the only law Christians are to follow is “believe and love.” This leads Matt to frame concepts like repentance and personal holiness as legalism. When these guys say things like this, or like “Peter killed Ananias and Saphira,” there is a whole misguided theological system behind it. This is why Matt teaches that James did not understand the gospel when he wrote his epistle. His theological system cannot handle imperatives rooted in the moral law given in the Old Testament. Everything must be filtered through the specific words of Jesus. Yet even Jesus’ words before the cross may be irrelevant unless they are filtered through a hyper-grace lens. Matt sees anything before the cross as law-based, and therefore irrelevant to New Covenant Christians. These antinomian (without law) tendencies lead Matt to reject the ongoing need for repentance and growth in holiness, and ultimately sever a Christian’s hope for living faithfully under the New Covenant. Matt rejects the Lord’s Prayer contradicts his hyper-grace theology that denies the believer’s ongoing struggle with sin, need for repentance, and obligation to obey Christ’s commands. In Matt McMillen’s teaching, “not under law” means: 1) Christians are not bound to any moral commands—not even the Ten Commandments. 2) There’s no obligation to repent, obey, or be instructed. 3) Sanctification is automatic, not something you pursue. 4) Even Jesus’ own commands (pre-cross) don’t apply. What to Bible means: 1) Not under the law as a system of condemnation. 2) Under grace as a new covenant power to obey. 3) Free from the law’s curse, not from God’s moral will. #holynope #nope

🔴 CAPTION 🔴 Matt seems to hold to a radicalized version of New Covenant Theology (NCT). NCT sees a strong discontinuity between the Old and New Covenants, believes the Mosaic Law is entirely abrogated - including the 10 Commandments (moral law), and emphasizes that Christ is the only law-giver for the Christian. Matt’s radicalized version of NCT goes further, essentially denying that the believer’s life should be shaped by biblical imperatives grounded in the OT moral law, and teaching that the only law Christians are to follow is “believe and love.” This leads Matt to frame concepts like repentance and personal holiness as legalism. When these guys say things like this, or like “Peter killed Ananias and Saphira,” there is a whole misguided theological system behind it. This is why Matt teaches that James did not understand the gospel when he wrote his epistle. His theological system cannot handle imperatives rooted in the moral law given in the Old Testament. Everything must be filtered through the specific words of Jesus. Yet even Jesus’ words before the cross may be irrelevant unless they are filtered through a hyper-grace lens. Matt sees anything before the cross as law-based, and therefore irrelevant to New Covenant Christians. These antinomian (without law) tendencies lead Matt to reject the ongoing need for repentance and growth in holiness, and ultimately sever a Christian’s hope for living faithfully under the New Covenant. Matt rejects the Lord’s Prayer contradicts his hyper-grace theology that denies the believer’s ongoing struggle with sin, need for repentance, and obligation to obey Christ’s commands. In Matt McMillen’s teaching, “not under law” means: 1) Christians are not bound to any moral commands—not even the Ten Commandments. 2) There’s no obligation to repent, obey, or be instructed. 3) Sanctification is automatic, not something you pursue. 4) Even Jesus’ own commands (pre-cross) don’t apply. What to Bible means: 1) Not under the law as a system of condemnation. 2) Under grace as a new covenant power to obey. 3) Free from the law’s curse, not from God’s moral will. #holynope #nope

Heç bir yerə sahib olmamışam. #baku #azerbaijan #sonuvar #lyricsvideo #kesfet

Heç bir yerə sahib olmamışam. #baku #azerbaijan #sonuvar #lyricsvideo #kesfet

Ele fez de novo.. kkk #raiamsantos

Ele fez de novo.. kkk #raiamsantos

About

Robot

Legal

Privacy Policy