1. Home
  2. Detail

@ogaoga1009: シャカシャカした後長芋同士がくっついて片栗粉と青のりがついてない事があるので確認するといいです💡 #自炊 #cooking #簡単レシピ #料理 #japanesefood #おうちごはん #レシピ #おつまみ #晩酌

おがわ
おがわ
Open In TikTok:
Region: JP
Sunday 26 January 2025 11:21:14 GMT
90430
909
25
273

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (6.32MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (4.57MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

ko_v5103v
ko :
これ、最高に美味しかったです👏
2025-02-18 06:39:06
0
user5ah0hdug6l
安子こうち :
ナイスアイデア材料揃えて作りたく感謝です♪❣️
2025-01-28 00:07:46
1
user5825487984770
めん吉さん🫧🐝🍓🧸🧡❄🐥🌻 :
☺️☺️☺️
2025-01-29 03:42:12
1
toshiclover
toshi@clover :
😂
2025-02-24 09:37:32
0
xo_xo535
®️🤍 :
🌺🌺🌺
2025-02-21 11:09:31
0
misanosuke03
くみ :
😁😁😁
2025-02-03 17:02:32
0
kimiko095
cocos :
😳😳😳
2025-07-05 04:14:11
0
user1406218123113
ちゃん :
😁😁😁
2025-01-26 12:43:51
2
user32840623813282
グレちゃん :
皮剥かないの？
2025-01-26 16:32:14
2
user4509670937612
万年姉御 :
🥰🌹🌹🌹
2025-01-28 10:09:14
1
elicamiwa
elicamiwa :
蓮根でも作ってみました。美味しい！ありがとうございます。
2025-01-31 10:39:54
1
dy5r7rcdnc1z
dy5r7rcdnc1z :
美味しそう👌おやつになるね💞
2025-02-03 15:11:42
1
user93231516981210
コメ美 :
作ってみたい🥰🥰
2025-08-11 18:30:32
0
fumikoww
FUMIKO :
つい黒いところが気になり取ります。
2025-03-26 05:46:50
0
fumikoww
FUMIKO :
おいしそう。
2025-03-26 05:44:51
0
lacn_xx
みず :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-02-18 02:16:07
0
usercmo2ysmiqk
イオス５d :
外はカリカリ中はシャッキリってかな😃絶対😋間違いない❗
2025-02-04 22:31:54
0
To see more videos from user @ogaoga1009, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Gọi tên của anh là nắng…!
Gọi tên của anh là nắng…!
I THINK THIS IS MY BEST CONCERT VIDEO YET!! #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp #xyzbca #viral #dontletthisflop #fyp tags: @𝐆𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐞 🎧 @˚˖𓍢ִ໋❀˙⋆LeeLee!!˚˖𓍢ִ໋❀˙⋆ @soph💌 @@ 🧸ʟɪᴠ @⋆˚𝜗𝜚˚⋆⋆˚࿔ soph 𝜗𝜚˚⋆ @Sophie Barton @⋆˚｡⋆✧˚ 𝑬𝒎𝒔 ˚✧⋆｡˚⋆ @KENZIE⋆‧°𓏲ּ𝄢 @💚💚yari💚💚 @↷𝓡𝒐𝓶𝒂𝒂𝒂𝒂𝜗𝜚୭🧁 @🦢.
I THINK THIS IS MY BEST CONCERT VIDEO YET!! #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp #xyzbca #viral #dontletthisflop #fyp tags: @𝐆𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐞 🎧 @˚˖𓍢ִ໋❀˙⋆LeeLee!!˚˖𓍢ִ໋❀˙⋆ @soph💌 @@ 🧸ʟɪᴠ @⋆˚𝜗𝜚˚⋆⋆˚࿔ soph 𝜗𝜚˚⋆ @Sophie Barton @⋆˚｡⋆✧˚ 𝑬𝒎𝒔 ˚✧⋆｡˚⋆ @KENZIE⋆‧°𓏲ּ𝄢 @💚💚yari💚💚 @↷𝓡𝒐𝓶𝒂𝒂𝒂𝒂𝜗𝜚୭🧁 @🦢.
kalo iya, ngeri banget ga si😭😭 #hungryghostfestival #filmindonesia #horrorindonesia #fypシ゚viral🖤tiktok #98 #indonesia #endyarfian #fajarnugra #aciresti #imamdarto #propertyofslw
kalo iya, ngeri banget ga si😭😭 #hungryghostfestival #filmindonesia #horrorindonesia #fypシ゚viral🖤tiktok #98 #indonesia #endyarfian #fajarnugra #aciresti #imamdarto #propertyofslw
#foryourpage #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp #ግጥም_በግጥም
#foryourpage #fyppppppppppppppppppppppp #ግጥም_በግጥም
“Is it enough to say, ‘That wasn’t real Christianity’?” Madalyn Murray O’Hair, one of America’s most outspoken atheist activists, repeatedly challenged Christianity—not simply by questioning the existence of God, but by challenging the authority and influence of religion itself. Her criticism focused on a difficult historical question: If terrible things have been done in the name of a religion, how should those actions be understood in relation to the religion’s teachings? O’Hair pointed to religious persecution, warfare, dogmatism, inequality, and conflicts within Christian history as reasons to question whether the darker chapters could simply be separated from Christianity altogether. She also challenged the idea that Jesus should automatically be accepted as a moral authority. In public appearances, she made deliberately provocative arguments about Jesus, the Bible, morality, and the influence of Christianity. Her criticisms were often sweeping and confrontational, reflecting her broader opposition to organized religion. (PBS) But there is an important distinction. Christianity has encompassed vastly different traditions, interpretations, institutions, and movements across roughly two thousand years. Historians therefore debate how directly particular wars, persecutions, political actions, or social practices should be attributed to Christian doctrine itself. That makes O’Hair’s argument less about simply listing Christianity’s darkest moments—and more about asking how we judge a belief system. Should a religion be judged primarily by: 1️⃣ Its teachings? 2️⃣ What its followers have done in its name? 3️⃣ Or both? And if a believer says, “That wasn’t true Christianity,” what should determine whether that distinction is historically justified? O’Hair’s conclusions were fiercely controversial. But the question she raised remains worth examining: Do we judge ideas by their principles, their consequences, or the people who act in their name? What do you think? 👇🏾 #MadalynMurrayOHair #Christianity #Atheism #Religion #ReligiousHistory
“Is it enough to say, ‘That wasn’t real Christianity’?” Madalyn Murray O’Hair, one of America’s most outspoken atheist activists, repeatedly challenged Christianity—not simply by questioning the existence of God, but by challenging the authority and influence of religion itself. Her criticism focused on a difficult historical question: If terrible things have been done in the name of a religion, how should those actions be understood in relation to the religion’s teachings? O’Hair pointed to religious persecution, warfare, dogmatism, inequality, and conflicts within Christian history as reasons to question whether the darker chapters could simply be separated from Christianity altogether. She also challenged the idea that Jesus should automatically be accepted as a moral authority. In public appearances, she made deliberately provocative arguments about Jesus, the Bible, morality, and the influence of Christianity. Her criticisms were often sweeping and confrontational, reflecting her broader opposition to organized religion. (PBS) But there is an important distinction. Christianity has encompassed vastly different traditions, interpretations, institutions, and movements across roughly two thousand years. Historians therefore debate how directly particular wars, persecutions, political actions, or social practices should be attributed to Christian doctrine itself. That makes O’Hair’s argument less about simply listing Christianity’s darkest moments—and more about asking how we judge a belief system. Should a religion be judged primarily by: 1️⃣ Its teachings? 2️⃣ What its followers have done in its name? 3️⃣ Or both? And if a believer says, “That wasn’t true Christianity,” what should determine whether that distinction is historically justified? O’Hair’s conclusions were fiercely controversial. But the question she raised remains worth examining: Do we judge ideas by their principles, their consequences, or the people who act in their name? What do you think? 👇🏾 #MadalynMurrayOHair #Christianity #Atheism #Religion #ReligiousHistory
Kem nghệ#kemnghe #xuhuong
Kem nghệ#kemnghe #xuhuong

About

Legal