Đáng Để Suy Ngẫm
Region: VN
Wednesday 29 January 2025 11:40:36 GMT
269261
23209
124
1838
Music
Download
Comments
Mặc Mặc là mèo bé nhỏ😻 :
cũng đúng thôi bên anh ấy khi anh ấy kh có 1 thứ gì cả giờ anh ấy có một chút đã vun đắp cho ngkh òy😇 nhm ng ý đối xử kh tốt với anh ấy a ấy lại nhớ tới tui
2025-01-31 09:13:52
20
Just Dreamer🌷 :
Không thương thì thôi, đã sẵn sàng mở lòng thì luôn để cô ấy là sự ưu tiên, là người mà mình muốn che chở một đời.
2025-08-15 05:17:56
1
dễ tha thứ 🫦 :
dễ dàng có được lên kh đc trân trọng
2025-02-02 08:09:57
2
mí :
vẫn bị bỏ rơi đấy thôi
2025-02-01 02:22:39
2
Bôngiu🫧 :
Khong baoh hieu em xiu nao
2025-02-07 15:07:47
2
sáng :
thật sự gặp đc người con gái đó trân trọng cả đời,cả đời cố gắng lo cho cô ấy chỉ sợ cô ấy đi theo người khác giỏi hơn mìnhh
2025-05-01 16:00:45
1
璃 :
a kh biết trân trọng mình 🥺 đúng là thứ gì dễ có dc thì càng kbiet trân trọng
2025-03-03 23:24:16
1
ĐoànNguyên :
Dạaaa 🥰🥰
2025-02-01 06:54:17
1
dịu :
anh mất em rồi anh ạ, không có lần nào nữa đâu.
2025-02-22 20:47:04
1
H :
ng hiểu chuyện luôn thiệt thòi
2025-02-01 06:10:37
2
ttn :
rồi cũng bị đối xử khó chịu đấy thôi 🥺
2025-03-10 14:43:40
1
ùuu! :
co biet tran trong k?
2025-03-10 14:57:53
1
Út Nữ :
cô ấy chứ hong phải em.
2025-03-06 19:02:21
1
Y :
hiểu chuyện quá cũng là cái tộii..
2025-02-01 06:34:50
1
dyugfdgh :
vg😊
2025-03-15 12:15:18
0
Tiên Phan :
tớ đoán là họ hg trân trọng tớ r😶🖤
2025-01-31 12:49:30
2
Duy Nhat :
kiếm đâu ra
2025-02-01 04:24:41
1
ethuwsaiginh🥵 :
Anh đâu có bt mà Trân trọng em đâu
2025-01-30 11:51:29
4
THAO SINH :
@Xigtu🖇 💗
2025-03-22 01:52:19
3
𝑃ℎ𝑢̛𝑜̛𝑛𝑔 𝐿𝑖𝑛ℎ 🫧 :
😞
2025-02-23 09:20:35
2
tô ngọc giang :
@Bitss🥺
2025-03-10 17:20:55
2
Đạ𝐭 🥖 :
@𝐩𝐡𝐮𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐨🥰😘
2025-03-09 04:21:49
2
ngọc lành :
@Đại FD 👟 bít chưa hả
2025-03-29 17:00:59
1
bn :
@Hao Nguyen mong lần này em duoc yêu thuong..
2025-03-08 18:52:23
1
ngththanhloan04 :
😍😍😍
2025-03-07 15:38:01
1
To see more videos from user @tng.trn9007, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![The movie 22nd july was fire🔥 || Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[2] where g n = { 3↑↑↑↑3, if n=1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3, if n≥2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.](/video/cover/7662327907720629537.webp)
