@medalgamexclawcrane: ロッカーの中のロッカーを狙ってみたww#ネタ#クレーンゲーム#ufoキャッチャー#ゲーセン#自宅#clawmachine#arcade#nintendoswitch

だぶるあっぷ
だぶるあっぷ
Open In TikTok:
Region: JP
Friday 31 January 2025 07:56:38 GMT
4463010
44459
198
674

Music

Download

Comments

muhammad.idrees2559
Muhammad Idrees :
that's not real
2025-02-23 11:51:23
0
qasz44
앙꼬없는~찐빵 :
주인이구만~~ 열쇠가 어디있는줄 아는걸보니
2025-02-02 04:44:28
0
severtin11
🌲💰🍡🐰쪽제비🐰🍡💰🌲 :
닌텐도 스위치😳😳😳
2025-02-01 17:39:04
0
patrykollo15_
enduro_z_nitro :
automat w Polsce nigdy
2025-02-01 07:56:23
1
asigema7535
Asigemaa :
فديو تسويقي للعبة يعرف المفتاح
2025-02-02 23:47:06
0
ggyeblan._666
Тайская шлюха :
а мне?
2025-02-01 17:42:52
0
kostyater7
имя :
сигма
2025-02-01 15:32:45
0
edgars_555
Эдгар :
замок весит просто на ручке не ужели не заметно
2025-02-03 15:38:22
1
user3614082527405
Женька :
я хочу ета сібье😎😎😎
2025-01-31 14:31:25
2
nurdaullet4
Nurda :
Кім қазақ
2025-02-01 19:02:47
0
mr.martincat
Mr. :
да не может быть так легко выйгать
2025-02-01 11:42:49
6
nvrgang
gng :
when you have a claw machine at home
2025-01-31 09:26:58
23
k.nerkes
ACUMA :
у нас в России их фиг зацепишь
2025-02-01 19:43:14
2
michi1047r
☜✦<ꪖꪹꪖ>✦☞ :
jsjajaja
2025-01-31 08:00:02
1
veritovidal263
Verito Vidal263 :
😂😂😂
2025-01-31 14:40:35
1
md.samidul307
Md Samidul :
😂😂😂
2025-03-09 01:46:37
0
alpha.maga.gv
ALPHA MAÏGA GV :
😎
2025-02-02 12:58:15
0
alif.islam621
Alif Islam :
😁😁😁
2025-02-02 08:21:59
0
hamaben628
hamaben628 :
😳😳😳
2025-03-06 14:10:00
0
subhanmughal3829
Abdullah myghal :
😂😂😂
2025-02-02 18:43:55
0
hendo2009
hendo2009 :
😂
2025-03-30 10:42:30
0
.raki96
Roki :
😎😎😎
2025-02-02 12:31:16
0
marco.abarca2
Marco Abarca :
😁😁😁
2025-03-06 07:00:16
0
tappu1230
tapendraxattri :
🔥🔥🔥
2025-02-02 10:15:19
0
vanz41y2272
@VA_NZ★ :
😂😂😂
2025-01-31 10:49:15
0
To see more videos from user @medalgamexclawcrane, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

#ball #spiral #funny #balls Graham’s Number: A Deep Dive Graham’s number is one of the largest numbers ever used in a serious mathematical proof. It was introduced by mathematician Ronald Graham in the 1970s while studying a problem in an area of mathematics called Ramsey theory, which investigates how order inevitably appears within large enough structures. Although Graham’s number is unimaginably huge, it is finite, well-defined, and far smaller than many numbers explored in modern logic and set theory. The problem involved coloring the edges of a high-dimensional cube. Graham needed an upper bound on the dimension where a certain pattern must always appear. His original proof produced Graham’s number as a safe upper limit. Later research dramatically reduced that bound, but Graham’s number remains famous because of its extraordinary size and elegant construction. To understand why it is so large, begin with ordinary growth. Addition grows steadily, multiplication grows faster, exponentiation grows even faster, and repeated exponentiation creates power towers. For example, 3^{3^3} is already much larger than 3^3. Mathematicians generalize this process using Knuth’s up-arrow notation, invented by Donald Knuth. One arrow represents exponentiation, two arrows represent repeated exponentiation (tetration), three arrows repeat tetration, and each extra arrow creates a vastly more powerful operation. Graham’s number is built recursively. First define a number g_1 using 3 with an enormous number of up-arrows between two 3s: 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 This alone is already so immense that writing its decimal expansion is impossible. Next, define g_2 as 3 separated by g_1 up-arrows and another 3. Since g_1 itself is unimaginably large, the number of arrows explodes beyond comprehension. Continue this process so that each new value determines the number of arrows in the next. After repeating this construction until g_{64}, the final value is Graham’s number. Its decimal representation cannot fit inside the observable universe. Even if every particle stored billions of digits, there would still be nowhere near enough space to write the number completely. The number of digits alone is vastly beyond anything physically representable. Despite its enormous size, Graham’s number has interesting properties. It has a definite last digit, which is 7, and mathematicians can compute several of its ending digits using modular arithmetic. This demonstrates an important principle: numbers can be too large to write yet still possess computable characteristics. Many people mistakenly believe Graham’s number is the largest possible number. Mathematics has no largest finite number, because adding one always produces a larger value. Even expressions such as TREE(3), SCG(13), or values arising from the On Numbers and Games framework dwarf Graham’s number by an incomprehensible margin. These numbers emerge from different branches of mathematics involving combinatorics, graph theory, or logic. The importance of Graham’s number is therefore historical and educational rather than practical. It illustrates how abstract mathematical reasoning can naturally produce quantities far beyond physical intuition. Rather than being a curiosity invented for shock value, it represents a genuine milestone in combinatorics, showcasing the extraordinary scale that rigorous mathematics can reach while remaining perfectly precise and logically defined. #polyesteredit
#ball #spiral #funny #balls Graham’s Number: A Deep Dive Graham’s number is one of the largest numbers ever used in a serious mathematical proof. It was introduced by mathematician Ronald Graham in the 1970s while studying a problem in an area of mathematics called Ramsey theory, which investigates how order inevitably appears within large enough structures. Although Graham’s number is unimaginably huge, it is finite, well-defined, and far smaller than many numbers explored in modern logic and set theory. The problem involved coloring the edges of a high-dimensional cube. Graham needed an upper bound on the dimension where a certain pattern must always appear. His original proof produced Graham’s number as a safe upper limit. Later research dramatically reduced that bound, but Graham’s number remains famous because of its extraordinary size and elegant construction. To understand why it is so large, begin with ordinary growth. Addition grows steadily, multiplication grows faster, exponentiation grows even faster, and repeated exponentiation creates power towers. For example, 3^{3^3} is already much larger than 3^3. Mathematicians generalize this process using Knuth’s up-arrow notation, invented by Donald Knuth. One arrow represents exponentiation, two arrows represent repeated exponentiation (tetration), three arrows repeat tetration, and each extra arrow creates a vastly more powerful operation. Graham’s number is built recursively. First define a number g_1 using 3 with an enormous number of up-arrows between two 3s: 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 This alone is already so immense that writing its decimal expansion is impossible. Next, define g_2 as 3 separated by g_1 up-arrows and another 3. Since g_1 itself is unimaginably large, the number of arrows explodes beyond comprehension. Continue this process so that each new value determines the number of arrows in the next. After repeating this construction until g_{64}, the final value is Graham’s number. Its decimal representation cannot fit inside the observable universe. Even if every particle stored billions of digits, there would still be nowhere near enough space to write the number completely. The number of digits alone is vastly beyond anything physically representable. Despite its enormous size, Graham’s number has interesting properties. It has a definite last digit, which is 7, and mathematicians can compute several of its ending digits using modular arithmetic. This demonstrates an important principle: numbers can be too large to write yet still possess computable characteristics. Many people mistakenly believe Graham’s number is the largest possible number. Mathematics has no largest finite number, because adding one always produces a larger value. Even expressions such as TREE(3), SCG(13), or values arising from the On Numbers and Games framework dwarf Graham’s number by an incomprehensible margin. These numbers emerge from different branches of mathematics involving combinatorics, graph theory, or logic. The importance of Graham’s number is therefore historical and educational rather than practical. It illustrates how abstract mathematical reasoning can naturally produce quantities far beyond physical intuition. Rather than being a curiosity invented for shock value, it represents a genuine milestone in combinatorics, showcasing the extraordinary scale that rigorous mathematics can reach while remaining perfectly precise and logically defined. #polyesteredit

About