Matthew and Paul
Region: US
Friday 31 January 2025 16:42:26 GMT
386071
42617
1646
204
Music
Download
Comments
sarsy_c :
The audacity of people not understanding the law. Mr Maple is NOT a pet! He’s a lifeline
2025-01-31 17:38:19
517
withasparkle :
If the host had said “oh I have two reactive dogs so I don’t think it would be safe for your service dog” and then cancelled the booking, would that have been a better solution?
2025-01-31 18:13:51
878
Brian Stincic :
Love your video! ❤❤❤❤❤
2025-02-01 21:44:32
2
Allison Unsicker :
It’s crazy that their dog would have unrestrained access to guests period. With or without a guide dog.
2025-01-31 17:02:45
4431
Farkey :
I don’t get why you’re saying they threatened you?
2025-01-31 23:26:50
12
daeseregruin :
I have a reactive dog it boggles my mind that the hosts would think it's anything other than their responsibility to make sure guests & service animals are safe while they work with a trainer!
2025-01-31 17:58:11
344
Kendy :
It’s always “comment unavailable”
2025-01-31 23:17:22
142
sMo :
Even when people are rude to you, you’re still so sweet ❤️I just love your pawsitivity 🐾
2025-01-31 16:52:03
516
Jane Roynon :
Missed the first part, were the hosts refusing to refund your deposit!!!
2025-01-31 17:24:10
3
Lizzie :
I am glad you had been refunded because it was fair. But still on the point that you should ask before booking. Even with ADA, as i said if someone replies you they put « no pet » because one of host
2025-01-31 18:43:12
4
🇳🇿🏳️🌈ChattyChap🇳🇿🏳️🌈 :
I think people's response to this wasnt as sympathetic or understanding of your situation as I would have thought. Whilst Mr Maple is more than a service dog hes part of your family and like people hes not on 24/7 but he could be and as you have said countless times when hes working hes not a pet. round of hugs to you all especially to Mr Maple who it is clear in my mind would have been at risk thankfully you didnt stay with those hosts.
2025-02-01 04:42:23
6
Sar :
The host could have offered a refund with the information of the dogs being reactive. This is where the problem was.
2025-01-31 18:45:33
527
stressedmommabear3.0 :
I dont understand their logic on the dogs not attacking people just other dogs. like how do they know that 100%.
2025-01-31 19:39:14
49
Maddy 💖 :
I’m so glad that they refunded you :-) and went above and beyond to give you credit too
2025-01-31 17:04:51
298
Lindsay :
I don’t think it was a threat, it sounded more like letting you know that there are pets on the property and they might be aggressive with Mr. Maple. I’m glad you got it resolved though, rightfully!
2025-01-31 17:32:30
9
Username :
My issue that I didn’t see brought up is what if you didn’t email them ahead of time, when you’re not required to, showed up with Mr. Maple and he got attacked!!
2025-02-01 00:52:09
157
kross :
It feels weird booking somewhere that says no pets,and although legally Mr Maple is not a pet,my instincts would say that there must be a reason they don't want any animals and I'd avoid.Refund though
2025-01-31 19:32:41
19
Emily Catherine :
Thank you for your light❤️you are so amazing
2025-01-31 16:54:03
44
Barbara :
Glad you got a refund
2025-02-01 02:09:51
3
Maureen Dickson :
Great you got your money back . I so can't believe the comments people have left over this it's madness
2025-01-31 16:55:51
635
To see more videos from user @matthewandpaul, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
