@hr_explained: If you want hiring based on merit, you support DEI. If you want hiring based on qualifications, you support DEI. No, you cannot say you don’t support DEI but do support hiring based on merit. These sentiments actually clash. If you don’t support diversity, equity, and inclusion, please tell me why you support segregation, unfairness, and exclusion. Because not supporting DEI means you would be in support of segregation, unfairness, and exclusion. Will you feel that way when you’re treated unfairly? Or left out? We all know the reason you “don’t support DEI” is because you don’t actually want to fairly compete for a role with more qualified candidates and DEI leads to larger candidate pools which means more competition for you. So you won’t be as privileged. I get it. You’d rather compete against less applicants that are qualified than more. This means you’re benefiting from a bad system. A system that includes racism, sexism, other forms of discrimination, and general or specific unfairness. Also, you may not be a protected class right now. But if you live long enough, you will be. How do you want to be treated when that time comes? Leaders and managers, I’m looking at you. If the people you hire and your team lack diversity, it points to a problem. The problem may be your bias. It could be your work environment isn’t welcoming to all people. It could be you don’t know how to recruit effectively. #hrtiktok #humanresources #careertiktok #managersbelike #worktok #corporatetiktok #corporatelife #greenscreen #newjob

HR Explained
HR Explained
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Thursday 06 February 2025 23:26:20 GMT
5333
493
44
37

Music

Download

Comments

oldewhittington
Justin Whittington III™ 🤗 :
When they say that they mean the best person that looks like them
2025-02-06 23:35:07
26
sashagracecreations
Sasha Grace Creations :
They will walk straight into the point and STILL miss it. 🤦🏻‍♀️😩😂
2025-02-07 03:27:07
11
miss_arrobinson
Amanda :
Me, a DEI Director, the past 3 weeks: 🤨🥴😩😞🙄🙄🥴😒😒🫠😩🤬🫢
2025-02-07 12:21:53
4
krysnix7
KrysNix :
They still won’t get it
2025-02-07 02:55:16
7
karb1983
Kari :
as an hr pro I have been fighting for my life out here. 🥺
2025-02-07 10:14:01
3
steheimer
steheimer :
Well said!
2025-02-07 02:29:37
1
benjamin_hollon
Benjamin Hollon :
This is why I hate living in a rural area. This is a never ending conversation. And no matter how many times you have it, they never get it.
2025-02-07 01:21:26
8
the_tuz
user1621871557026 :
Nah. Your take is wrong on DEI evolvement and application. Laws existed before DEI became a thing.
2025-02-09 10:01:35
2
sheem2630
Sheema :
Thank you!
2025-02-06 23:54:29
1
hchitv
Chi Yan :
My financial planner didn’t file bankruptcies 6 times
2025-02-07 01:29:55
0
rissaspalding
Rissa Spalding :
I love your videos lol
2025-02-07 03:04:26
1
user53617434
Jennifer Dennis-Murd :
Unrelated you look so pretty!
2025-02-06 23:34:30
1
eugenegenegenie
Genie :
What DEI meant on some of the big tech firms: - I need to hire an employee - hey, interview those two folks, we need to hit our dei quotas. Dont worry abt their performance,i'll give you athother rec
2025-02-10 23:32:57
1
sunflowerscape
sunflowerscape :
Right…
2025-02-07 16:31:51
0
feisty_c
FeistyC ♏️🦂 :
💯💯💯💯💯💯 Well said!
2025-02-07 14:43:59
1
leeonya_71
LIANA 🌺☀️🌊 :
Well said! 💯
2025-02-07 06:17:55
1
christylou1
ChristyLou :
This!!!!
2025-02-07 09:12:07
1
cheriemclaughlin1
cheriem :
🤣🤣🤣🤣 This is fantastic.
2025-02-07 13:28:13
1
novamarieb
Nova :
😂😂😂 💯💯💯
2025-02-08 02:04:37
1
iancallahan10
Ian callahan :
They are indoctrinated by the ramblings of their favorite politicians and their media sources.
2025-02-07 04:10:13
2
genethebean1
Genethebean :
👏👏👏👏👏
2025-02-07 02:22:45
1
eatmeatonly0
eatmeatonly0 :
Equity is not equality. Equity aims for equal outcomes, equality aims for equal opportunity.
2025-02-06 23:48:24
1
nattedweil80
nattedweil80 :
They believe that being white and male ARE qualifications. Anyone who doesn’t have those is therefore less qualified than a white male.
2025-02-07 13:13:19
2
juliapmoody
Julia :
“39 comments have been filtered” is so real, if a comment does enough to get filtered I’m not even looking at it 😂
2025-02-07 16:45:57
1
To see more videos from user @hr_explained, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Push a normal American grocery cart through customs in much of the world and some of it gets stopped at the border. Not strange, exotic stuff. Cereal. Soda. Bread. Brightly colored candy your kids eat by the handful. The reason is printed right on the label, in words you skim straight past. Potassium bromate in the bread. Azodicarbonamide in the soft buns. Titanium dioxide whitening the candy. BHA and BHT keeping the cereal
Push a normal American grocery cart through customs in much of the world and some of it gets stopped at the border. Not strange, exotic stuff. Cereal. Soda. Bread. Brightly colored candy your kids eat by the handful. The reason is printed right on the label, in words you skim straight past. Potassium bromate in the bread. Azodicarbonamide in the soft buns. Titanium dioxide whitening the candy. BHA and BHT keeping the cereal "fresh" on the shelf for months. Food dyes that, across the ocean, legally require a warning printed on the box. Where they're restricted or banned outright: the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, parts of South America — over links to cancer risk, hormone disruption, or damage to DNA. But the twist most people miss isn't the chemicals at all. It's the rule sitting behind them. Europe bans a substance the moment it might be harmful, and forces the company to prove it's safe before it ever reaches a shelf. America lets it stay until someone manages to prove it's dangerous — a process that can crawl on for decades while it's already in your cart. So you were never eating "confirmed safe." You were eating "not yet proven harmful enough to pull." Two completely different sentences, quietly wearing the same comfortable word on the front of the box. … So the ingredient list was never the headline. The headline is who carries the burden of proof. In most of the developed world, the company has to prove the food won't hurt you. In the United States, your body is the long-running experiment, and the proof gets gathered one breakfast at a time, for years, before the label changes. The food isn't banned elsewhere because those countries are paranoid. It's allowed here because the rule asks for evidence of harm first, and caution a distant second. Flip one box in your kitchen tonight and read the fine print for those exact names. Find one? Drop it in the comments — let's see how long this list gets by morning.

About