@abo_saker13:

Oday ahmad

Open In TikTok:

Region: PS

Sunday 09 March 2025 20:20:16 GMT

10525

421

2

46

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (2.24MB) No Watermark(HD) .mp4 (19.97MB) Watermark .mp4 (2.29MB) Music .mp3

Comments

ᎷᎯ X :

استغفرالله العظيم

2025-03-10 02:27:46

0

بن خطاب :

لا تترك صلاتك فقط خوي المسلم للغدر يخرج من الجنة لا فزعة تدخل للفردوس الاعلى

2025-03-10 03:01:20

0

To see more videos from user @abo_saker13, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

63 #thichsieuxe #mohinhxe

63 #thichsieuxe #mohinhxe

#leowomen

#ياعلي

Not sure what I would do without my girls 🫶

Not sure what I would do without my girls 🫶

Trying on the Aurola short #workoutshorts #amazonfinds

Trying on the Aurola short #workoutshorts #amazonfinds

Romans 1 is a complex chapter and admittedly poses the biggest challenge to the affirming position. For the purpose of this short video, the simple point is that just because same sex relations are said to be “contrary to nature” doesn’t rule them out of God’s plan, or else the salvation of the Gentiles would be ruled out as well! This argument comes from the theologian Eugene Rogers, in his book “Sexuality and the Christian Body.” His argument is based on “God’s acting ‘contrary to’ or ‘beyond’ nature in incorporating the Gentiles into the Jewish olive tree (Rom. 11:24) [and] God’s predilection for irregular sexuality in salvation history, as in the cases of the women named in the genealogy of Jesus.” A lot more can be said about Romans 1, but what is clear from Romans 2 and the argument of the rest of the book is that Romans 1 is *not* primarily a diatribe against homosexuality, it’s a “rhetorical sting operation” where Paul “let his readers regard same-sex sexual activity as a characteristically Gentile sin of excess, one that [Jewish Christians] could temporarily pride themselves on avoiding, until chapter 2 comes in… [and] Jews turn out also to be without excuse.” Finally, we should also read this chapter keeping in mind that Paul had no understanding of homosexual orientation, so the relationships he would have had in mind were seen as excessive because he would have been picturing what we know as heterosexual people engaging in homosexual sex. . . . . . . . . . . . #f#faithb#beliefc#christianityc#churchB#Bible#christianity#evangelicalismd#deconstructiont#theology#s#sexualitys#sexe#ethics#p#purityculturequeertheology #gaychristian

Romans 1 is a complex chapter and admittedly poses the biggest challenge to the affirming position. For the purpose of this short video, the simple point is that just because same sex relations are said to be “contrary to nature” doesn’t rule them out of God’s plan, or else the salvation of the Gentiles would be ruled out as well! This argument comes from the theologian Eugene Rogers, in his book “Sexuality and the Christian Body.” His argument is based on “God’s acting ‘contrary to’ or ‘beyond’ nature in incorporating the Gentiles into the Jewish olive tree (Rom. 11:24) [and] God’s predilection for irregular sexuality in salvation history, as in the cases of the women named in the genealogy of Jesus.” A lot more can be said about Romans 1, but what is clear from Romans 2 and the argument of the rest of the book is that Romans 1 is *not* primarily a diatribe against homosexuality, it’s a “rhetorical sting operation” where Paul “let his readers regard same-sex sexual activity as a characteristically Gentile sin of excess, one that [Jewish Christians] could temporarily pride themselves on avoiding, until chapter 2 comes in… [and] Jews turn out also to be without excuse.” Finally, we should also read this chapter keeping in mind that Paul had no understanding of homosexual orientation, so the relationships he would have had in mind were seen as excessive because he would have been picturing what we know as heterosexual people engaging in homosexual sex. . . . . . . . . . . . #f#faithb#beliefc#christianityc#churchB#Bible#christianity#evangelicalismd#deconstructiont#theology#s#sexualitys#sexe#ethics#p#purityculturequeertheology #gaychristian

About

Robot

Legal

Privacy Policy