sandi 925 ပြည်မြို့သူလေး
Region: MM
Saturday 22 March 2025 06:36:23 GMT
493469
29562
384
288
Music
Download
Comments
ဖုန္းကေလး ခ်စ္သူ :
ညီမလေးရေ..လက်ကောက်လေးတွေက..ရေစိုချွေးစိုခံလား...ရန်ကုန်အိမ်ရောက်ငွေချေရလား..ညီမလေး
2025-03-22 07:47:42
3
user946573481152ghkbnkgbbfgxhj :
အမဘယ္ၿမိဳကလည္း
2025-03-30 13:42:36
1
Mimi Cho :
ညီမလေး နယ်ကိုရောပို့ပေးသလားရှင့်
2025-03-26 05:16:50
1
@💔💔💔 :
မမရေ ကျောက်ပွင့်သေးလေးနဲ့ ဘယက် ပုံဆွဲ ကြိုးလေးပြပေးပါလား😘
2025-04-12 15:34:34
1
🖤ဝတ်မှုံ🖤 :
မမရေ ညီမက ပန်းတောင်းကပါ မှာချင်လို့ပါ
2025-04-26 07:15:23
1
yuyuaung779 :
လက်ကောက်လေးလိုချင်တယ်လက်ကြီးတယ်ဘယ်ဆိုဒ်လောက်မှာရင်အဆင်ပြေမလဲရှင့်
2025-04-24 14:18:22
1
မေသကြန်🥰🥰🥰😇😇 :
ပြည်ကဘယ်နာမှာလဲ
2025-06-01 03:14:47
0
☃𝚈𝚞𝚛𝚒꙳ :
မမကပြည်ကလာရှင့်
2025-05-21 06:15:17
0
✨Zûe Myât Nâñdâr✨ :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-06-18 16:14:36
1
may zin lay🌈 WPPN🌈🌈🌈Fan🌈 :
💚💚💚
2025-03-25 06:51:16
1
Smile queen🍎🍎🍉🍉🍓🍓🥭🥭 :
😂
2025-08-10 09:01:23
1
ZinMgMg :
ဖုန်းနံဘက်ကမသုံးတဲ့နံဘက်တွေတော့မဟုတ်ပါဘူးနော်
2025-03-22 08:22:08
7
lay san myint :
လှလိုက်တာ
2025-03-23 07:05:05
3
jennifer_7784 :
လှလိုက်တာ
2025-03-23 01:29:55
2
hlwan pyae sone aung :
မြုိသစ်ပိုလား
2025-03-23 07:00:49
2
ဖူးဖူးမေမေ(mini food shop) :
🥰🥰🥰လှလိုက်တာ
2025-03-22 07:01:48
2
💚💚💚💚💚Yuzana💚💚💚💚💚 :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-03-22 06:43:09
2
ตุ๊กตา :
မှာချင်တယ်
2025-03-23 13:59:46
2
dawthida :
လှတယ်နော်ရောင်းကောင်းပါစေ
2025-04-19 14:28:03
1
🩵𝐄𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭🩵 :
ထည်ဝါ ခန့်ညားစွာလှပပါတယ်😍😍😍😍😍😍
2025-03-22 07:15:58
2
AyeYati(NyeinNyein&Thatoeမေမေ) :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-03-23 05:53:36
2
🇲🇲 Đaw £àý żìñ 🇹🇭 :
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
2025-03-24 01:51:24
1
မစနေမ :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-03-24 06:06:59
1
yuwai730ဘရော််နီကာ :
လှလိုက့်တာ💞💞💞💞
2025-03-24 01:27:29
1
ပန်းချယ်ရီ :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-03-23 22:51:26
1
👩❤️👨NAY NAY👩❤️👨 :
ဘယ်လိုမှာရမလဲရှင်
2025-03-23 20:25:39
1
👩❤️👨NAY NAY👩❤️👨 :
အစ်မ
2025-03-23 20:25:21
1
မွန်လေး :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-03-23 18:10:57
1
ရှမ်း မလေး :
💖💖💖
2025-03-23 18:08:26
1
Nu Nu Htwe :
💜💜💜
2025-03-23 17:20:39
1
user704738815440 :
💜💜💜❤❤❤🥰🥰🥰😍😍😍
2025-03-24 03:25:47
1
aung.ko.aungko :
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
2025-03-24 03:42:33
1
Ei Phyu :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-03-24 05:45:19
1
santhitla12. သားသားမေမေ :
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
2025-03-23 14:35:01
1
T.Z.Aung🇲🇲🇲🇲🇲🇲 :
💕💕💕
2025-03-24 07:16:26
1
Sky Lay :
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
2025-03-24 08:05:22
1
Win Win :
😅😅😅
2025-03-24 08:25:15
1
thetmarlin6 :
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
2025-03-24 08:30:54
1
Alex :
😘😘😘
2025-03-24 10:32:09
1
Pan Pan :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-03-24 13:24:50
1
kuekue5403 :
😁
2025-03-24 15:09:26
1
Tilly(တိုင်လီ)🌼🌼 :
ဆွဲကြိုးလေးရယ်လက်စွပ်ရယ်လို့ချင်တယ်
2025-03-24 15:45:49
1
Htoo Hein Aung :
😁😁😁
2025-03-24 15:49:34
1
Htoo Hein Aung :
😂😂😂
2025-03-24 15:49:34
1
khin su :
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰လှလိုက်တာ
2025-03-23 10:06:31
1
honey htwae :
လှလိုက်တာတစ်ဆက်လုံး
2025-03-23 07:57:51
1
phufi1 :
😂😂😂
2025-03-23 08:09:32
1
Daw Thwe :
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
2025-03-23 08:14:29
1
Wai Mar Khaing :
တန်လိုက်တာ🥰
2025-03-23 08:24:18
1
Kate :
လှတယ်
2025-03-23 09:02:47
1
San San Yin :
🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰
2025-03-23 09:11:07
1
Gu Gue :
😘😘😘
2025-03-23 09:39:24
1
Gu Gue :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-03-23 09:39:25
1
Gu Gue :
😘😘😘
2025-03-23 09:39:35
1
WAI LWIN :
ထိုင်းကမှာလို့ရလားမမ
2025-03-23 09:43:42
1
user4234676112631 :
လှလိုက်တာရှယ်ဘဲ အားပေးမယ်
2025-03-23 09:50:31
1
Țĥàê pĥýű :
ကလေးလက်ကောက်လေးတွေပြပေးပါလားရှင့်
2025-03-23 16:12:21
1
Gigi :
လှလိုက်တာ
2025-03-23 11:15:57
1
To see more videos from user @userown5dclxr0, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3↑↑↑↑3, if n=1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3, if n≥2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid. Reupload #iqmaxx #333 #larp #highiq #sinister](/video/cover/7655975266904280353.webp)