You are 100% correct. However, the completeness of the list of countries including inhabited islands and the lack of specifics makes me think that is very probable that they used a tool like ChatGPT..
2025-04-07 18:02:13
21
Falling :
Well, then „no, they are not“ is also incorrect. „We do not know“ would be honest…
2025-04-07 21:12:24
16
M :
Both yours and Nate's are both right and wrong. Nate's inference would be right but your example too. Many roads lead to Rome. Same end result....
2025-04-07 19:45:30
10
The Great Grahambini :
chatGPT does not recommend Trump’s trade policy unless you specifically ask it to develop a tariff to incentivize a reduction in trade imbalances
2025-04-07 20:56:41
1
grand.71 :
there's another clue: regions of the same nation get different tariffs, if they have specific top level domains. look at Svalbard (.SJ) and Norway (.no). this smell a lot like AI hallucination
2025-04-07 18:58:14
7
user5314273100262 :
ok... you start with a very bold "No, they're not" and provide not even a glimpse of proof. what does that make you?
2025-04-08 06:36:49
3
beauzin :
So like anyone who uses Pythagorean theorem is getting that from chatgpt too?
2025-04-10 02:37:53
1
bajan_ronin :
the issue with with u say is that 1 why did they used that equation when it does make sense to used. and 2 the countries that is onthe list that does make sense. the mistake that ai would make
2025-04-25 19:21:59
1
Mike C :
Trump going to a techno club is not a likely scenario. Using a LLM is quite possible. Combine that with the incompetence of his team and their inabiloty to fact check and you get a plausible scenario
2025-04-08 01:53:02
2
Lettucepray :
Tik tok is filled with ai “geniuses”
2025-04-07 19:53:59
1
VHSRawr :
Think? Mate I prompt, I no longer think. Get used to this new world
2025-04-09 05:52:19
1
DaftBear :
But it’s not just ChatGPT, it’s all the LLMs. They all give the same wrong equation for calculating tariffs. That’s suspicious isn’t it? If it was just one, the coincidence but all of them… hmm
2025-04-08 02:33:58
1
Human :
So the question is where got Chat gpt this from?
2025-04-07 20:30:37
1
Zuck :
Are you telling me that trump saw the tariffs in a bathroom of a techno club?
2025-04-08 07:50:08
1
Daria Mironova567 :
It can be true and untrue. They may have consulted with LLMs (why not?) but from the part of experienced economists and statistics professionals, it doesn’t mean that they trusted LLMs for the decision. We people are still responsible for the actions
2025-04-08 08:23:44
1
Jules 🇿🇦🇲🇫🇮🇹🇬🇧📗📕📘 :
correlation Vs causation 💃💃💃
2025-04-08 06:04:01
0
Coach Vincent :
“retrieval augmented generation” (RAG) and chain-of-logic; each has different outcomes! 😊😊😊
2025-04-08 10:28:40
1
MightyCoon🕯️ :
damn...roasting now....
2025-04-11 01:24:14
0
Stealmydebt :
Our Cheeto in chief colored in a hurricanes path with a sharpie last time around. Thinking he asked chatGPT would be an IMPROVEMENT 😅😅😅
2025-04-07 17:32:27
4
goegeloee :
Thing is even if for the sake of argument AI did recommend this policy, nobody in his right mind, especially those ivy league grads in the white house would approve of such radical policy.
2025-04-07 22:46:05
1
Andre Yong :
👏👏👏
2025-04-08 04:46:10
1
FritzStraub :
@Nate care to elaborate ur point of view?
2025-04-07 19:01:32
1
vstr :
correlation is not causation. but the formula is so stupid that it is not likely to come from human expert
2025-04-07 18:32:38
4
Fuck_zionists_shitty_fascists :
il problema é che usato chat gpt o no, le tariffe determinate sono state pensate da capre...
2025-04-09 14:26:09
1
To see more videos from user @gianluca.mauro, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.