@ntik237: البيوتُ القديمة حنينٌ يسكنُ القلوبَ فخلف أبوابِها عبقٌ يفوح ،تركتهُ أرواحُ ساكنيها 🍀 #ذكريات_الزمن_الجميل #ذكريات #قديم #كلثوميات_الليل_☕🎼 #كلثوميات #طرب #عبير⚘️ #اقوال_وحكم_الحياة #نوستالجيا

معاني✍️وأغاني📻 عجباني🫰
معاني✍️وأغاني📻 عجباني🫰
Open In TikTok:
Region: EG
Thursday 10 April 2025 20:44:49 GMT
102585
2877
80
909

Music

Download

Comments

user2358612570748
قهوة سادة بدون سكر :
▶️شاهد الفيديو بالكامل الآن! https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS9SyJxwB/
2026-04-28 06:33:49
0
user38206013384308
اميره💙 :
سوف تلهو بنا الحياه عزالله لهت بنا وسخرت منا وينهم راحو 💔💔💔💔
2026-01-12 02:05:32
1
dag.dag57
Dağ ابو جبل :
هاذا الجدران كانت تحتوي علا جيل لن يتكرر عبر الزمن كان الحب مقدس وكانت العائلة مقدسة وكان الصدق والاخلاص من اولوياتها لذالك اخرج منها الشعراء والفن
2025-04-27 09:24:00
3
user4861179305555
مهره :
اعشق كل شئ. قديم. مش عارفه ليه ♥️
2025-12-01 00:06:14
1
950h....cat
Rami :
الله 🥰👌
2025-04-12 12:58:32
2
by_nareen
by_nareen :
صحيح جمال الأشياء القديمة لاتختفي بل تبقى اجمل ذكرة جميلة ❤️❤️
2025-04-26 17:15:21
3
bjla50
جمال ابن محيو :
الجزائر
2025-04-10 20:52:21
3
sanaamerhej
Sanaa :
فعلا كل شي قديم احلى👍
2025-04-13 06:26:14
3
user7m9ie94paz
user7m9ie94paz :
حبيبه
2025-04-15 19:59:09
2
rowanrowan203
روان روان9856 :
الله الله
2025-04-19 02:27:24
2
user2376263384630
بهيج الدويري :
ھذة ليلتي غنتھا الست من كلمات الشاعر اللبناني جورج جارداق ولحنها موسيقار الأجيال محمد عبد الوهاب 🥰🥰
2025-04-11 00:19:05
3
mumrana199
Yasmine :
ممكن حفظ الفيديو من فضلك
2025-04-26 14:52:01
1
osaamasharaky
Samah :
روعه ♥️♥️♥️
2025-05-06 00:38:26
1
hamid.ammara
Hamid Ammara :
🥰🥰🥰
2025-04-17 21:17:09
2
albbiboana1411
قلب بيبو :
♥️♥️♥️
2025-04-10 21:35:44
3
To see more videos from user @ntik237, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.#edit #spanishcivilwar #edit #viral #abc #fyp #fyppp #fypp #trending #pleasegoviralllll
Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) Graham's number is an immense number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form a b c ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ {\displaystyle a^{b^{c^{\cdot ^{\cdot ^{\cdot }}}}}}, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387. Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g 64 {\displaystyle g_{64}},[1] where g n = { 3 ↑↑↑↑ 3 , if n = 1 and 3 ↑ g n − 1 3 , if n ≥ 2. {\displaystyle g_{n}={\begin{cases}3\uparrow \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow 3,&{\text{if }}n=1{\text{ and}}\\3\uparrow ^{g_{n-1}}3,&{\text{if }}n\geq 2.\end{cases}}} Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular science writer Martin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman's various finite forms of Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.#edit #spanishcivilwar #edit #viral #abc #fyp #fyppp #fypp #trending #pleasegoviralllll

About