@julia_wanders: The best summer news I swear 🥹 #lorde

julia 💌✨
julia 💌✨
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Friday 11 April 2025 21:49:20 GMT
851
80
0
1

Music

Download

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @julia_wanders, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

When people ask how many children were born from white enslavers and enslaved Black women in America, the hardest truth is that we will never know the exact number. The system was designed to hide it. Enslaved women were legally considered property, which meant their pregnancies weren’t officially recorded, white fathers went unacknowledged, and racial categories on early censuses labeled people by appearance, not parentage. What we do have are patterns, demographic clues, DNA evidence, and the records enslavers left behind. By the 1860 census—right before the Civil War—about 588,000 people were labeled “mulatto.” Most lived in the slave states. That term included multiple generations of mixed ancestry, not just first-generation children of white masters, but it shows just how common white-Black mixing was under slavery. Historians like Berlin, Fogel, and Engerman estimate that by 1860, around 10 to 20 percent of all enslaved people had noticeable mixed European ancestry. With roughly 4 million enslaved people at the time, that means between 400,000 and 800,000 had mixed ancestry across generations. But when you narrow it down to just the children directly fathered by white men—masters, overseers, traders, and other white men in the slave system—scholars generally estimate somewhere around 150,000 to 250,000 births from 1600 to 1865. DNA studies of African Americans today, which show an average of 20 to 24 percent European ancestry (overwhelmingly from white men), line up with this estimate once you account for the way ancestry compounds over generations. This didn’t just happen on plantations. In cities like New Orleans and Charleston, sexual exploitation of enslaved domestic workers was widespread. In some areas, nearly half of enslaved women in urban settings had mixed ancestry by the mid-1800s. And because of the law known as partus sequitur ventrem, any child born to an enslaved mother was automatically enslaved—no matter who the father was. That meant white men could increase their own labor force and profit from the children they fathered. It was exploitation built into law. These numbers aren’t just statistics. They reflect a system where sexual violence, coercion, and power were inseparable from slavery itself. They shaped the genetic and cultural landscape of Black America today, and their impact didn’t end in 1865. It echoes through families, records, DNA, and the silence left behind. The real number may never be known, but the scale was enormous, widespread, and foundational to how slavery operated. This is one of the parts of history people don’t always talk about, but it deserves to be told.  #BlackHistory #slavery #enslavedpeople #mixedrace #africanamericanhistory
When people ask how many children were born from white enslavers and enslaved Black women in America, the hardest truth is that we will never know the exact number. The system was designed to hide it. Enslaved women were legally considered property, which meant their pregnancies weren’t officially recorded, white fathers went unacknowledged, and racial categories on early censuses labeled people by appearance, not parentage. What we do have are patterns, demographic clues, DNA evidence, and the records enslavers left behind. By the 1860 census—right before the Civil War—about 588,000 people were labeled “mulatto.” Most lived in the slave states. That term included multiple generations of mixed ancestry, not just first-generation children of white masters, but it shows just how common white-Black mixing was under slavery. Historians like Berlin, Fogel, and Engerman estimate that by 1860, around 10 to 20 percent of all enslaved people had noticeable mixed European ancestry. With roughly 4 million enslaved people at the time, that means between 400,000 and 800,000 had mixed ancestry across generations. But when you narrow it down to just the children directly fathered by white men—masters, overseers, traders, and other white men in the slave system—scholars generally estimate somewhere around 150,000 to 250,000 births from 1600 to 1865. DNA studies of African Americans today, which show an average of 20 to 24 percent European ancestry (overwhelmingly from white men), line up with this estimate once you account for the way ancestry compounds over generations. This didn’t just happen on plantations. In cities like New Orleans and Charleston, sexual exploitation of enslaved domestic workers was widespread. In some areas, nearly half of enslaved women in urban settings had mixed ancestry by the mid-1800s. And because of the law known as partus sequitur ventrem, any child born to an enslaved mother was automatically enslaved—no matter who the father was. That meant white men could increase their own labor force and profit from the children they fathered. It was exploitation built into law. These numbers aren’t just statistics. They reflect a system where sexual violence, coercion, and power were inseparable from slavery itself. They shaped the genetic and cultural landscape of Black America today, and their impact didn’t end in 1865. It echoes through families, records, DNA, and the silence left behind. The real number may never be known, but the scale was enormous, widespread, and foundational to how slavery operated. This is one of the parts of history people don’t always talk about, but it deserves to be told. #BlackHistory #slavery #enslavedpeople #mixedrace #africanamericanhistory

About