@ninunaaa: Kalian pernah coba yang mana?🤠 #hairtok #hairoil #rosemarygairoil #rishminyakkemiri

NunaChu✿
NunaChu✿
Open In TikTok:
Region: ID
Thursday 01 May 2025 10:12:40 GMT
296781
29107
108
281

Music

Download

Comments

karisazharfa
karisazharfa :
aku udh pake dua²nya, yg lashboss udh 4 botol, rish baru 1 botol ini. lashboss cepet buat numbuhin baby hair sm manjangin rambut tp kdg jd ngembang cocok low porosity, bisa pake hair tonic. rish bikin lembuttttt bgt sm shiny karena dia kemiri, cmn di hari ke 3 lepek lgsg, gabisa gabung hair tonic
2025-07-16 00:14:38
38
momont0k
momont0k :
lashboss bgs bgttttttttt sumpah ga buzzer bikin rambut halus plus tebel, cmn ya baunya agak nyengat jd mesti 2 kali keramas
2025-05-25 08:34:55
77
mbapacar69
Bianca Aja! :
Aku rish ga cocok 😭😭😭
2025-05-29 11:00:29
9
vindyaar
Vindyaar_ :
pake 22 nya sih selang seling, baby hair numbuh tp rontok masih ada, plus minum vit.D3 y sama vit.rambut minum dr swiss (yg bikin rontok berkurang byk), jgn lupa pake hair tonic jg 🙂
2025-05-18 23:00:56
23
shiroeyui
via :
pake rish boleh pke hair tonic GK sih ? masa baca di keterangan enggk boleh 😔
2025-06-07 00:44:15
2
phieytavita
vhiyta_vheiy :
Wah msuk wishlist aku nih yg lagi menyusui n roktok pooll,,,
2025-05-09 12:23:39
7
babang.bulbul
🌼kata si bulbul🌼 :
ada yg udh coba yg makarizo rosemary ? bingung mau nyoba lashbosh atau makarizo
2025-09-09 19:38:07
0
vvictor_iya
victtory :
naksir bngt sama kandungan ROSMERY SAMA KEMIRI di rish 😭 MANA HARGANYA MURAH BANGET?!✨
2025-05-01 12:21:58
24
fafarh01
v𝖊𝖑𝖎𝖆 :
REKOMEN BGTT BUATT AKUU SII,, MASUK WISHLIST AKUU HEHEE💗
2025-05-01 14:48:09
5
wahyusriwulndri_
𐙚 𝐀𝐲𝐮𝐮𝐋𝐆𝐒 ˚❀˖🎀༘ :
Sumpah si bonvie hair tonicnya ampuh banget buat numbuhin rambut rontok after lahiran. di era gempuran hair oil lain gue masih cocok sama rish, ngaruh banget bjirrr
2025-05-01 17:39:56
12
piiwpiiw22
Pipiw :
Matanya kaya aku sleep eye sebelah 😁
2025-09-16 05:55:34
1
usergabut44444
sofiaa𐙚 :
yg rish lumayan affordable ya kak,apalagii ingredient nya kemiri sama rosemery mantull bgtt✨ masuk wishlist ah😻
2025-05-01 14:59:54
6
skynkla
skynakala :
kmren perna nyoba di oh some yg lasbos pdhl rambut uda di catok, dia kek halus gt ih abistu tahan lama
2025-05-02 12:34:47
5
strawberryberry___
K :
lash boss juaraa emgg!!
2025-05-04 13:57:51
2
rrevaaaa_
revaaaa🩰 :
kepo bangett plss harga nya affordable banget mana 60 ml lagii🥹🤏🏻
2025-05-01 11:11:36
5
riris_lvg
Yeoreum🌄 :
nambah lahi nih keranjang
2025-05-03 10:09:13
1
mustikaas23
asasagung🌷 :
Selalu pingin nyobain produk2nya 🥰
2025-05-01 12:09:33
1
jenogfhere
￴ ￴￴ ￴￴ ￴ ￴￴ ￴￴ ￴ ￴￴ ￴ ￴ :
aku coba rish kak kemarin
2025-05-02 02:31:01
1
hervinlailatul
HervinLailatul :
akuuu penasaran bngett sama lashboss😍💘
2025-05-01 21:58:29
1
zn.magic
ZNcare :
jejak
2025-07-04 08:17:35
0
mami.kai109
mami kai :
klo stlah pake hair oil rish ini trus after shampoan trus pake hair lab ampoule aman ga?
2026-04-22 15:03:13
0
kmlybf
melwy :
kak aku kalo pake hair oil kok jadi banyak rontok ya?
2025-09-09 05:00:10
0
kiaaa170
kiaaa :
aku blm pernh coba semua wkw
2025-08-07 08:47:30
0
sariwulan227
hicows :
kirimka
2025-07-05 02:16:06
0
citra_2958
Ncitt |Beauty secret🫦 :
kepo sama yang rish kaaaaa
2025-05-01 10:24:38
0
To see more videos from user @ninunaaa, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

The idea that having bigger muscles can win an argument is a notion that intertwines physical presence with social dynamics, often reflecting deeper societal perceptions about strength, dominance, and authority. While it might seem simplistic or even superficial to assert that muscle mass can influence the outcome of a discussion, the reality is that the way we perceive and interact with others is heavily influenced by physical attributes, including size and strength. Firstly, physical strength can evoke a sense of intimidation. In many cultures, muscularity is synonymous with power and dominance. When someone with a more muscular physique enters a conversation, they may inadvertently command more attention and respect simply due to their physical presence. This phenomenon is not limited to physical confrontations; it extends into verbal and intellectual exchanges as well. The psychological impact of a larger individual can lead others to concede or avoid confrontation, believing that their arguments may be rendered moot in the face of such imposing physicality. Moreover, societal narratives often equate physical prowess with competence and confidence. This perception can skew the dynamics of an argument, where the individual with a larger physique might be seen as more assertive or credible, regardless of the actual validity of their points. This can create a situation where the person with bigger muscles may not necessarily have to win the argument through logic or reason but rather through the sheer weight of their physical presence. This dynamic is particularly evident in settings where social hierarchies are at play, such as in schools, workplaces, or even social gatherings, where the muscular individual can dominate conversations simply by the force of their personality, amplified by their physical stature. However, it is crucial to recognize that relying on physicality to win arguments can lead to superficial victories. Arguments based solely on physical intimidation can stifle genuine dialogue and undermine the importance of critical thinking and reasoning. Such tactics can foster an environment of fear or resentment rather than constructive discussion. In the long run, this can backfire, as individuals may grow to resent the muscle-bound counterpart for their inability to engage intellectually. The winner of an argument is not always the one who is bigger but rather the one who can articulate their thoughts and persuade others through reasoned discourse. Additionally, the reliance on physical intimidation can create a culture where ideas are less valued than the ability to exert control through force. This can discourage diverse perspectives and the healthy exchange of ideas, which are vital for growth and understanding. Engaging in arguments with a focus on intellect and empathy can lead to more meaningful resolutions and a greater understanding of differing viewpoints. In conclusion, while having bigger muscles can create an advantage in certain social contexts and may influence the dynamics of an argument, it is not a guaranteed method for winning discussions. The true strength lies in the ability to communicate effectively, listen actively, and engage thoughtfully with others. Building intellectual muscles, so to speak, can foster deeper connections and more productive conversations, ultimately leading to a more enlightened and cohesive society. Relying solely on physical attributes to assert dominance can diminish the quality of discourse and inhibit genuine understanding among individuals, making it essential to prioritize intellect and empathy over mere physicality in any argument.#gym #GymTok #gymbro #fyp #gymrat
The idea that having bigger muscles can win an argument is a notion that intertwines physical presence with social dynamics, often reflecting deeper societal perceptions about strength, dominance, and authority. While it might seem simplistic or even superficial to assert that muscle mass can influence the outcome of a discussion, the reality is that the way we perceive and interact with others is heavily influenced by physical attributes, including size and strength. Firstly, physical strength can evoke a sense of intimidation. In many cultures, muscularity is synonymous with power and dominance. When someone with a more muscular physique enters a conversation, they may inadvertently command more attention and respect simply due to their physical presence. This phenomenon is not limited to physical confrontations; it extends into verbal and intellectual exchanges as well. The psychological impact of a larger individual can lead others to concede or avoid confrontation, believing that their arguments may be rendered moot in the face of such imposing physicality. Moreover, societal narratives often equate physical prowess with competence and confidence. This perception can skew the dynamics of an argument, where the individual with a larger physique might be seen as more assertive or credible, regardless of the actual validity of their points. This can create a situation where the person with bigger muscles may not necessarily have to win the argument through logic or reason but rather through the sheer weight of their physical presence. This dynamic is particularly evident in settings where social hierarchies are at play, such as in schools, workplaces, or even social gatherings, where the muscular individual can dominate conversations simply by the force of their personality, amplified by their physical stature. However, it is crucial to recognize that relying on physicality to win arguments can lead to superficial victories. Arguments based solely on physical intimidation can stifle genuine dialogue and undermine the importance of critical thinking and reasoning. Such tactics can foster an environment of fear or resentment rather than constructive discussion. In the long run, this can backfire, as individuals may grow to resent the muscle-bound counterpart for their inability to engage intellectually. The winner of an argument is not always the one who is bigger but rather the one who can articulate their thoughts and persuade others through reasoned discourse. Additionally, the reliance on physical intimidation can create a culture where ideas are less valued than the ability to exert control through force. This can discourage diverse perspectives and the healthy exchange of ideas, which are vital for growth and understanding. Engaging in arguments with a focus on intellect and empathy can lead to more meaningful resolutions and a greater understanding of differing viewpoints. In conclusion, while having bigger muscles can create an advantage in certain social contexts and may influence the dynamics of an argument, it is not a guaranteed method for winning discussions. The true strength lies in the ability to communicate effectively, listen actively, and engage thoughtfully with others. Building intellectual muscles, so to speak, can foster deeper connections and more productive conversations, ultimately leading to a more enlightened and cohesive society. Relying solely on physical attributes to assert dominance can diminish the quality of discourse and inhibit genuine understanding among individuals, making it essential to prioritize intellect and empathy over mere physicality in any argument.#gym #GymTok #gymbro #fyp #gymrat

About