@unfilteredwuncandme: Watch extended clip on YouTube - Link in bio! #unfilteredwuncandme #uncleal #litigger1k

UNFILTERED WITH UNC AND ME
UNFILTERED WITH UNC AND ME
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Sunday 18 May 2025 16:30:44 GMT
489
19
1
1

Music

Download

Comments

giovanni.brooks5
Giovanni Brooks :
Must be the generation after the baby boomers because we didn't play that
2025-05-18 19:16:48
1
To see more videos from user @unfilteredwuncandme, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos

If a sitting government official is asked point-blank whether they’ve ever ordered the military to shoot unarmed civilians, there is only one acceptable answer: “No. Never. Absolutely not.” But that’s not what Pete Hegseth said. In a chilling moment during a congressional hearing, Senator Elissa Slotkin asked Hegseth a direct and serious question: Have you ever given the order for the military to fire on unarmed civilians? Instead of answering with a clear and humane “no,” he laughed. When Slotkin pushed back—rightfully—on why he’d laugh at such a deadly serious matter, Hegseth deflected. He mocked the source of the claim (a former official’s book) and said, “Be careful what you read in books—unless it’s the Bible.” Let that sink in. He could have just said “No.” But he didn’t. He laughed. He dodged. He politicized the question. And he referenced the Bible instead of defending the basic human rights of civilians. Senator Slotkin reminded him where this concern came from: his predecessor—a Trump-appointed official—wrote in his book that Trump ordered him to shoot protesters. That man had the moral clarity to refuse. And now here we are, under a new regime, asking the same questions again. This isn’t just about politics. This is about the line between democracy and authoritarianism. The normalization of state violence. The chilling comfort with which GOP officials now treat discussions of military force against Americans. Because if you can’t say no to that question… You’re telling us everything we need to know. . : . #breakingnews #breaking #military #fdt #trumpadministration #protests #nokings #nokingsinamerica #petehegseth #elissaslotkin #senator #peacefulprotest #freespeech  . . @Team Slotkin
If a sitting government official is asked point-blank whether they’ve ever ordered the military to shoot unarmed civilians, there is only one acceptable answer: “No. Never. Absolutely not.” But that’s not what Pete Hegseth said. In a chilling moment during a congressional hearing, Senator Elissa Slotkin asked Hegseth a direct and serious question: Have you ever given the order for the military to fire on unarmed civilians? Instead of answering with a clear and humane “no,” he laughed. When Slotkin pushed back—rightfully—on why he’d laugh at such a deadly serious matter, Hegseth deflected. He mocked the source of the claim (a former official’s book) and said, “Be careful what you read in books—unless it’s the Bible.” Let that sink in. He could have just said “No.” But he didn’t. He laughed. He dodged. He politicized the question. And he referenced the Bible instead of defending the basic human rights of civilians. Senator Slotkin reminded him where this concern came from: his predecessor—a Trump-appointed official—wrote in his book that Trump ordered him to shoot protesters. That man had the moral clarity to refuse. And now here we are, under a new regime, asking the same questions again. This isn’t just about politics. This is about the line between democracy and authoritarianism. The normalization of state violence. The chilling comfort with which GOP officials now treat discussions of military force against Americans. Because if you can’t say no to that question… You’re telling us everything we need to know. . : . #breakingnews #breaking #military #fdt #trumpadministration #protests #nokings #nokingsinamerica #petehegseth #elissaslotkin #senator #peacefulprotest #freespeech . . @Team Slotkin

About