Giancarlo Leonardi
Region: IT
Sunday 22 June 2025 11:26:15 GMT
642488
56312
1392
9599
Music
Download
Comments
Vegas CJ :
il maschio iniziava ad innervosirsi
2025-06-23 07:05:03
18987
N‼️ :
io pur di allungare il tema in italiano:
2025-06-22 23:38:51
17071
Non mi rompere :
Io cercando di chiudere una chiamata
2025-06-22 23:57:50
8032
io.e.basta :
ma per caso si rivedono presto?
2025-06-22 23:15:39
9492
selena :
non la lascia parlare 😭😭😭🥀🥀
2025-06-22 23:42:34
5563
Mura :
le chiamate italiane
2025-06-23 07:03:25
3518
Fastidio&Castigo 🍉 :
AHAHAAHAHAH😂 Lui che perde completamente la pazienza e le parla sopra 😂
2025-06-23 08:50:43
3027
jaaaake06 :
se si lasciano loro due non credo più nell’amore
2025-06-23 12:57:09
1927
makkou 👻 :
a una certa dicono anche "A presto!"
2025-06-23 06:20:30
1510
Soltantouno2022 :
Che educazione, però.
2025-06-23 06:46:15
1767
Velena🐍 :
men ☕🤣
2025-06-23 11:46:51
383
Piero D220 :
"Chiudi prima tu..." ❤️. "No, chiudi prima tu..." ❤️. 😂😂😂🤦🏻
2025-06-23 07:36:36
866
🇧🇷🥽 :
riassunto del video: a presto
2025-06-22 23:29:00
610
EightyMike :
Lui si stava stancando😂
2025-06-23 09:20:48
360
Sasa :
Is she bothering you king🙏🥀?
2025-06-23 14:19:46
87
Gretaaa :
"CiAo A pReStO a PrEsTo"
2025-06-23 12:02:01
477
Mary :
mi stanno facendo innervosire 🤣🤣
2025-06-23 07:43:12
232
Lucrezia Benedetti :
mi sto sentendo male lui che non la fa finire
2025-06-23 11:52:50
89
htnaris :
il bro sta cercando di predictare 😭😭
2025-06-23 17:59:13
17
DoctorAI :
ragazzi, ma quando finisce? sono da due giorni in questo video...
2025-06-22 22:33:16
457
Domenico :
Adesso voglio che si mettano insieme. ❤️❤️❤️
2025-06-23 09:01:41
114
🖤💙🖤💙🖤💙 :
፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱ il maschio si è incazzato 😂 ፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱፱
2025-06-23 11:44:56
80
maya :
sto morendo i commenti
2025-06-23 08:33:37
12
caterina cacchiani :
Ma si sono innamoratiiiiii come quando alle medie dicevi riattacca tu no tu no tu noooo tu 😂
2025-06-23 05:19:09
133
feffeagostini :
Come si chiama l’app? Voglio farlo anche io
2025-06-23 13:21:41
8
To see more videos from user @giancarloleonardi, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
![#targetaudience Graham's number is a very large number that arose as an upper bound on the answer of a problem in the mathematical field of Ramsey theory. It is much larger than many other large numbers introduced as effective bounds in mathematics, such as Skewes's bound, which in turn is much larger than a googolplex. Graham's number is so large that the observable universe is far too small to contain its ordinary digital representation, assuming that each digit occupies one Planck volume. But even the number of digits in this digital representation of Graham's number would itself be a number so large that its digital representation cannot be represented in the observable universe. Nor even can the number of digits of that number—and so forth, for a number of times far exceeding the total number of Planck volumes in the observable universe. Thus, Graham's number cannot be expressed even by physical universe-scale power towers of the form abc⋅⋅⋅, even though Graham's number is indeed a power of three. However, Graham's number can be explicitly given by computable recursive formulas using Knuth's up-arrow notation or equivalent, as was done by Ronald Graham, the number's namesake. As there is a recursive formula to define it, it is much smaller than typical busy beaver numbers, the sequence of which grows faster than any computable sequence. Though too large to ever be computed in full, the sequence of digits of Graham's number can be computed explicitly via simple algorithms; the last 10 digits of Graham's number are ...2464195387.[1] Using Knuth's up-arrow notation, Graham's number is g64,[2] wheregn={3↑↑↑↑3,if n=1 and3↑gn−13,if n≥2. Graham's number was used by Graham in conversations with popular scienceMartin Gardner as a simplified explanation of the upper bounds of the problem he was working on. In 1977, Gardner described the number in Scientific American, introducing it to the general public. At the time of its introduction, it was the largest specific positive integer ever to have been used in a published mathematical proof. The number was described in the 1980 Guinness Book of World Records, adding to its popular interest. Other specific integers (such as TREE(3)) known to be far larger than Graham's number have since appeared in many serious mathematical proofs, for example in connection with Harvey Friedman Kruskal's theorem. Additionally, smaller upper bounds on the Ramsey theory problem from which Graham's number was derived have since been proven to be valid.](/video/cover/7679129156520594696.webp)
