xiaopangus64
Region: US
Wednesday 02 July 2025 12:06:00 GMT
7885
154
21
0
Music
Download
Comments
MizzTee :
✋🏻✋🏻✋🏻✋🏻 trying to police everyone's actions and time but their own per usual 🙄🙄
2025-07-02 14:36:29
9
jg221309 :
I don't want to be on camera......but then walks up and Interacts with camera.
2025-07-02 12:56:07
8
Fanny Longbottom :
She just doesn't get it😭💯
2025-07-03 01:29:58
3
Ricky Roxx :
And now your famous
2025-07-02 13:32:32
4
Jarrod_RealEstate :
Make up laws as we go
2025-07-02 13:17:35
1
Karen Nisbet :
No it’s not lady…..there’s NO expectation of privacy in public nd public photography is a constitutionally protected activity anything the eye can see from public!
2025-07-04 05:11:25
1
briandickson976 :
PUBLIC
2025-07-02 12:41:04
3
City1 🦁♌️ :
😂
2025-07-02 13:09:38
0
ChynADoll1111 :
🤣🤣🤣
2025-08-11 02:32:05
0
BenjaminWeiler :
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
2025-07-04 19:55:28
0
Alrightalright :
😂
2025-07-04 14:41:23
0
patty Montoya :
😁
2025-07-05 04:52:54
0
tatted brauny girl :
🤣🤣🤣
2025-07-02 16:22:45
0
tonytrentham133 :
😂
2025-07-03 20:59:54
0
Vytas :
🥰
2025-07-03 08:42:05
0
Lavaughn :
❤️❤️❤️
2025-07-03 03:54:12
0
Armen Pogosian :
😂😂😂
2025-07-03 03:43:09
0
iosonowayne :
😂😂😂
2025-07-02 18:08:39
0
Dylan Watson762 :
When no crime has occurred or is reasonably suspected, calling the police to provoke their presence may serve as an intimidation tactic, particularly when done in coordination with law enforcement. Although officer presence is the first step in the use of force continuum, its misuse raises serious constitutional concerns. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable seizures, and coercive police presence without cause may violate civil liberties. If done with others to suppress lawful conduct—such as filming in public—it may constitute conspiracy to violate rights under 18 U.S. Code § 241, a federal crime. As affirmed in United States v. Price (1966), officials acting under color of law can be criminally liable. A conviction requires only proof of an agreement and intent to deprive rights—not actual harm. In Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (2011), the First Circuit held that filming public officials in public is a “basic, vital, and well-established liberty” protected by the First Amendment.
2025-07-02 13:26:08
3
Old School Wrestling :
And now The Purple People Eater is now famous…congratulations
2025-07-04 12:11:52
0
Karen Nisbet :
Walk away lady pretty simple really……good day!
2025-07-04 05:12:00
0
To see more videos from user @xiaopangus64, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.
