She would’ve been worse because she makes this evil empire more resilient. Trump will bring about the collapse of this empire much sooner. And given the extinction level climate catastrophe we are experiencing, the death of this hellhole couldn’t come soon enough
2025-07-06 06:32:39
12
ria_batman :
idk if think she would have been pretty much the same domestically. she said she'd have the strictest immigration policy in history. her administration was very violent towards college protests etc. I think only difference is democrats would have blamed everything on congress, but most of the same stuff would have been happening. two sides same corporate coin.
2025-07-06 12:08:05
30
user28462527494826 :
Wdym domestically? Her plan to restore abortion rights was to wait for the senate to send her a bill, she loves cop cities, haven’t heard a peep about universal healthcare, she promised to be tougher than trump on immigration, and to this day her campaign believes she lost because she wasn’t moderate enough. kamala and trump represent the same decline in quality of life, just keep in mind how little criticism towards kamala is accepted
2025-07-06 07:58:56
180
ethelcainlover44 :
Poor people and children are gonna die in the US bc their benefits are being drastically cut. We no longer have birthright citizenship. Kamala would’ve been better.
2025-07-06 13:37:59
44
stungright :
thinking that kamala would've been worse or even on the same plane as trump internationally is laughable man. kamala would've been awful but trump is actively gutting all alliances, and USAID and aligning ourselves and emboldening right wing authoritarian regimes around the world. not to mention making ice the 3rd largest military ON EARTH💀💀💀
2025-07-05 23:56:16
91
jakf1717 :
She would be better, idk enough to say good but definitely better
2025-07-06 06:44:27
53
bjorklover29 :
Can we stop with the cope she’d be a little better? Every one of her economic and social policies are 1000x better than what’s being passed rn. They both have terrible foreign policy but domestically it isn’t even close like just compare tax plans
2025-07-06 15:19:37
31
Meme lord :
And yet kids are still being bombs and now we have concentration camps in our own country couldnt deal with 4 years of Kamala but fine with dealing with the decades of damage trump will do
2025-07-06 21:42:49
7
Modern Failures ☭ :
Also Liberals don’t use a dialectical ways of thinking, and only think in terms of the short term solution while not realizing a lot of the problems faced abroad eventually has a way of coming back and affecting the US negatively. A lot of foreign issues correlate to domestic issues.
2025-07-07 18:32:05
17
Ur._.Claudiaa :
She quite literally said she doesn’t stand for war, which is more than what Donald Trump has ever said. She is also experienced in all three branches of government so I probably would trust her way more. 💀 when it comes to Palestine, she condemned them, but she obviously couldn’t criticize their behavior completely because we are literally allies with them, but in general, her relationship with the Middle East would’ve been vastly improved compared to Trump.
2025-07-05 23:20:53
20
sara :
Harris would be great. Her character was incredible and no corruption too. Phil Gordon was also an incredibly national security advisor besides anyone else in the Middle East. Why would she do that with Gordon? She was way better than Obama even.
2025-07-06 01:05:37
5
MuchoJoDo :
yup trump winning is helping democrats actually pay attention to gaza, only because trump is doing it now. If she were in office, the libs would still be excusing gaza, and Zorhan would've lost
2025-07-06 22:35:35
11
MonkeyGirl :
she would have been better domestically and on some issues internationally as well look for Ukraine and the green deal and other things like that
2025-07-06 14:54:07
5
you know :
A little bit ?!!!
2025-07-06 19:43:07
3
YT: IDSonlineidk :
Not only this but Kamala’s strategy was to appeal to moderates, shifting US policy to the right. Kamala is so progressive wanting the most lethal military, supporting Israel, and building the border wall. 🙄
2025-07-07 15:02:29
24
Revolution diva :
Liberals are the republicans of the left , they choose liberal so that people don’t think they are bad people
2025-07-07 18:30:37
3
. :
Liberals: consider themselves citizens of the nation state. Leftists: consider themselves citizens of the world.
2025-07-06 20:37:34
6
Mari :
She would’ve made the conditions for poor people in this country exponentially better. Every president elected in this country will be violent over seas. The goal is to make the material conditions of poor people here as good as possible and work to destroy and reframe the current system were in.
2025-07-06 12:42:29
14
bae.beedee :
Its almost like libreals are Just as reactionary as the conservatives they critique lol
2025-07-07 22:20:05
2
lizzie✨NYC PhD Lifestyle :
and when a dem is president you still only get l “AT LEAST ITS NOT TRUMP” when you point out problems
2025-07-06 13:39:52
3
lone_wolf3882 :
The only thing Harris would have been better at is making the liberals feel better about crimes against humanity.
2025-07-08 01:11:04
2
Clip song ☭ :
Israel still would be conducting its operations the same no matter whos in office and thats the real problem
2025-07-06 18:44:06
2
moongirlkeesh 🔻 :
like the did we see the state of africa and the middle east under obama?😭
2025-08-31 21:00:49
2
wagwand3lilah :
heavy on that last part
2025-07-07 23:31:10
1
To see more videos from user @mochayappuccino, please go to the Tikwm
homepage.