1. Home
  2. Detail

@barq_ltd: في فرق بين موقع حلو… وموقع يتكلم عنك. واحد يجذب، والتاني يربط. إنت محتاج موقع يشبهك… موقع يحكي للناس مين أنت. في برق، ما بنبني صفحات… إحنا بنبني انطباعات أولى ما تتنساش! 👁️‍🗨️ لو حاسس إن موقعك الحالي ما بيمثلك؟ اكتب في الكومنت: “أنا محتاج موقع يشبهّي” وهنوصلك فوراً 💬 #موقعك_يعبر_عنك #ابدأ_مشروعك #WebDesignArabia #محتاج_موقع #ModernWebExperience #BrandIdentityDesign

BARQ LTD
BARQ LTD
Open In TikTok:
Region: SA
Monday 07 July 2025 13:13:12 GMT
272
10
0
0

Music

Download

No Watermark .mp4 (2.33MB) Watermark .mp4 (0MB) Music .mp3

Comments

There are no more comments for this video.
To see more videos from user @barq_ltd, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos
امممم حبيتت #لاتزال_في_17 #جيرين_ايروك #daha17 #جيرين #cerenayruk
امممم حبيتت #لاتزال_في_17 #جيرين_ايروك #daha17 #جيرين #cerenayruk


OPINON | Democrats, already fretful as Hakeem Jeffries prepares to wield the Speaker’s Gavel in the House of Representatives, received little reassurance after he failed his latest leadership test. And it was a pretty easy test: His caucus just needed to wrangle the necessary votes to proceed with articles of impeachment against one Whiskey Pete Hegseth. But no, the bill fell 211-204. The only Republican who voted for the measure was the one who introduced it, Thomas Massie. Eleven Democrats did not vote at all. Of those, ten had previously expressed support for Hegseth’s removal, while one, Michigan’s Haley Stevens, apparently spent her time back on Capitol Hill hanging out in the Republican cloakroom with her hat. I don’t know what goes in that room, but I’m guessing the only cloaking being done was to hide Stevens’ shame, writes @michaelianblack  Had the other ten (or even eight) Democrats voted in support, ol’ Pete would be facing a very public airing of his alleged high crimes and misdemeanors, not the least of which is, you know, murdering people on the open seas. And bombing a girls’ school—three times. So what happened? Why did so many Dems miss their chance to hold a senior Trump official to account? Would you believe… traffic? Comment LINK to get a DM with the full story, or check it out at the link in bio! __________________ Photo Illustration by Victoria Sunday/The Daily Beast/Getty Images Photos by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images/Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters
OPINON | Democrats, already fretful as Hakeem Jeffries prepares to wield the Speaker’s Gavel in the House of Representatives, received little reassurance after he failed his latest leadership test. And it was a pretty easy test: His caucus just needed to wrangle the necessary votes to proceed with articles of impeachment against one Whiskey Pete Hegseth. But no, the bill fell 211-204. The only Republican who voted for the measure was the one who introduced it, Thomas Massie. Eleven Democrats did not vote at all. Of those, ten had previously expressed support for Hegseth’s removal, while one, Michigan’s Haley Stevens, apparently spent her time back on Capitol Hill hanging out in the Republican cloakroom with her hat. I don’t know what goes in that room, but I’m guessing the only cloaking being done was to hide Stevens’ shame, writes @michaelianblack  Had the other ten (or even eight) Democrats voted in support, ol’ Pete would be facing a very public airing of his alleged high crimes and misdemeanors, not the least of which is, you know, murdering people on the open seas. And bombing a girls’ school—three times. So what happened? Why did so many Dems miss their chance to hold a senior Trump official to account? Would you believe… traffic? Comment LINK to get a DM with the full story, or check it out at the link in bio! __________________ Photo Illustration by Victoria Sunday/The Daily Beast/Getty Images Photos by Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images/Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters
Scramble up ur name & I’ll try to guess it😍❤️ #foryoupage #PetsOfTikTok #aesthetic
Scramble up ur name & I’ll try to guess it😍❤️ #foryoupage #PetsOfTikTok #aesthetic


About

Legal