@jasonkpargin:

Jason Pargin, author
Jason Pargin, author
Open In TikTok:
Region: US
Wednesday 09 July 2025 00:37:00 GMT
603611
29647
785
483

Music

Download

Comments

jakeabetes
Idiot Wizard :
It's infinitely precise, not infinitely long. There's a limit.
2025-07-09 02:45:09
5927
lukey777
Luke Looorence :
This can be solved by realizing there is a finite length of measurement
2025-07-09 00:42:37
919
jim48000
Jim :
This is just a form of Zeno's Paradox, and it's wrong. Coastlines aren't infinite. They converge to finite length.
2025-07-09 01:21:41
682
redd.lester2022
redd.lester2022 :
Some of us were even born there unfortunately
2025-07-09 00:43:27
159
jole82
Solon :
An infinite series can still converge to a finite number
2025-07-09 01:09:54
73
viralobserver
viralobserver :
Definitely not infinite since there's a finite mass to measure. Whether it be rocks, sand, atoms or Planck lengths. Just very unreasonable to actually do.
2025-07-09 03:26:04
23
lupilupi245
lupilupi245 :
This is nothing close to infinite, at all
2025-07-09 04:32:22
84
phoenix_mista
Phoenix🍁 :
This is just Achilles and the tortoise. The plank length solves this. Eventually you won’t be able to break it down anymore. Reality doesn’t have true fractals.
2025-07-09 01:04:43
87
cookiethedog_yk
snowy_cookie 🇵🇭 :
Doesnt make it infinite. Its impossible to measure with a very high degree of accuracy but thats not the same as infinite. We cant measure the mass of the moon incredibly accurately doesnt make it infinite
2025-07-09 09:03:29
16
big_chungus4201
big_chungus4201 :
You can also use this logic to prove that there are an infinite number of sasquatches in West Virginia. One of which… I have fought.
2025-07-09 00:44:50
61
anenigma4
anenigma4 :
it's fractals all the way down
2025-07-09 01:38:32
13
jb31201
user6160204933074 :
Sounds like it’s unmeasureable not infinite.
2025-07-09 01:03:46
78
un4v5s8bgsvk9exp
￴ :
Sort off like saying there’s an infinite amount of numbers between 1 and 2
2025-07-09 09:12:12
11
probablywolves
maligator mommy :
Damn, I thought you were going to tell me that the Scottish Highlands and the Appalachian mountains used to be the same mountain range over 500 million years ago.
2025-07-10 00:35:44
10
jbtwentyfour
JBtwentyFour :
This doesn’t mean it’s infinite?
2025-07-09 03:03:47
305
brian_asmen2
Brian Asmen :
People will NOT think I’m a genius after this 💔
2025-07-09 22:42:32
6
tiberius937
Tiberius937 :
fractals are not smooth no matter how much you zoom in, using smaller and smaller rulers only works if it becomes a smooth curve as you zoom in closer
2025-07-09 00:44:20
8
cryptotsmith
Cryptotsmith :
This is the basis of calculus. Using equations that consider taking smaller measurements to infinity.
2025-07-09 02:54:31
20
ericwilliams964
rico :
still finite , not fractal
2025-07-09 15:43:40
11
breenmitch
Mitchell Breen 🇨🇦 :
Here’s something else to make you seem like a genius to others. You do not need to say “true fact” you can just say “fact”
2025-07-09 03:03:58
31
gsp2241
George P :
wouldn't it eventually converge to a number with diminishing returns evertime the measurement unit is decreased?
2025-07-09 01:53:15
10
mikeypython
Michael :
It converges to a finite value. This is why calculus is important
2025-07-09 04:59:46
27
nandrade013
Noe Andrade248 :
you measure it 1 ft above sea level to eliminate the shifting coastline factor
2025-07-09 00:51:39
11
vvlfgng
VVlfgng :
It's like Zeno's Dichotomy Paradox!
2025-07-09 00:46:04
8
alenhendro
Alenhendro :
I see many calculus enjoyers in the comment section completely missing the point. It is true the coastline is not "infinite" in the mathematical sense, assuming there is a minimum measurable unit of reality (which is on itself debatable), because once you reach that minimum measurement unit the total length won't increase. That is not really the point because no one uses that to compute the actual length of a coast. The interesting part is that the different lengths of the coast don't converge nicely into a value, at least for the observational measurements we have, the way they do with a circle. This increase is modelled using something called "the fractal dimension" (see The fractal geometry of nature by Mandelbrot for an introduction). So according to the data we have it is not correct to say that the length "converges to a limit", at least before reaching the "minimum measurement unit". For practical purposes, and considering the most commonly used theoretical mathematical models for this type of problems, the length of the coastline is unbound
2025-07-09 09:53:59
10
To see more videos from user @jasonkpargin, please go to the Tikwm homepage.

Other Videos


About